質性研究是人文社科領域重要的研究方法，也是社會學研究所必修的方法學課程之一，不僅有相當大的應用價值，更是增進綜合性知識學習的好工具，本門質性研究是課程改革後第一次在大四開設的必修課，希望在大三的社會科學研究方法課的基礎之上，藉由田野調查的實作，深化研究方法的學習。秉持跟研究所課程相同的「做中學(learning by doing) 」精神，課程的進行除了課堂講授、文本的導讀提問外，還包括田野調查實作，同學將以分組形式進行質性研究計畫，老師與助教將協助同學進入田野執行實地訪調，操作相關的質性方法內容，並設計可行的的研究題目，進行一手的資料蒐集與分析，從而讓質性研究能力能夠內化到學習者身上，得到有效的吸收。
本課程主要的方法聚焦於參與觀察、民族誌、深度訪談、扎根理論、個案延伸法、建制民族誌、行動研究與焦點團體法，強調在實作中學習質性方法，課程以東海別墅和新東里地區為全班共同的田野調查場址，老師和助教會協助同學進入田野，並經營基本的社區關係，每一位同學都要進入田野，並以分組形式進行社區的田野調查，在此基礎上提出具體的研究問題，操作參與觀察及深度訪談等質性方法，並在一個學期當中完成一份小而嚴謹的研究報告，於期末發表會上進行15分鐘的研究成果簡報。
在作業部分，每位同學均須投入社區田野調查、繳交一份田野筆記、按時繳交memo，除了個人作業外，本課程重視分組的調查研究，以六位同學為一組，在每一組當中，又以兩位同學為一個"二人組"單位，來執行深度訪談，每個"二人組"需要完成一個50分鐘以上的關鍵報導人深度訪談及逐字稿。每一組期末報告的資料內容，至少要有六份田野筆記以及150分鐘以上的訪談逐字稿，以作為資料分析及質性編碼的材料。最後三周將以各組的研究主題為核心，進行田野調查工作坊，以期按部就班完成期末研究計畫報告。
質性研究蓄勢待發，大家一起加油吧。
Quality research is an important research method in the field of humanities and social sciences, and is also one of the required methodology courses in the Institute of Social Sciences. It not only has considerable application value, but also a good tool to increase the learning of comprehensive knowledge. This department's quality research is the first compulsory course in the senior year after the course reform. I hope to deepen the learning of research methods based on the social science research method course in junior year through field survey work. Adhering to the same "learning by doing" spirit as the institute's course, in addition to class lectures and text guidance, the course also includes field survey work. Students will conduct quality research plans in the form of grouping, teachers and assistant teachers will assist students in entering the field to conduct practical visits, operate relevant quality method content, and design feasible research topics, conduct first-hand data collection and analysis, so that the quality research ability can be internalized into the learner and effectively absorbed.
The main methods of this course focus on participation, ethnic journals, in-depth interviews, rooted theory, case extension method, established ethnic journals, action research and focus group method, and emphasize the quality methods in practice. The course uses Donghai Villa and Xindongli area as the common field survey site for the whole class. Teachers and assistant teachers will help students enter the field and run the school For basic community relations, every student must enter the field and conduct community field surveys in the form of groupings. On this basis, they propose specific research questions, operate quality methods such as participation and observation and in-depth interviews, and complete a small but serious research report in a period of study, and conduct a 15-minute briefing of research results at the end of the period.
In the work part, each student must devote himself to community field surveys, submit a field notation, and submit memo on time. In addition to personal work, this course focuses on the investigation and research of the sub-groups, with six students as one group. In each group, two students are used as a "two-person group" unit to perform in-depth interviews. Each "two-person group" requires more than 50 minutes of in-depth interviews and word-by-word drafts. The data content of each set of final reports must include at least six field notes and word-by-word drafts for visits of more than 150 minutes as materials for data analysis and quality codes. In the last three weeks, field survey workshops will be conducted with the research topics of each group as the core, in order to complete the final research plan report step by step.
Quality research is ready to be developed, let’s work together.
The content of the course is based on a selection of qualitative research methods for data generation and analysis that are often used within the administrative and policy sciences. Students will be given the opportunity to critically appraise qualitative research studies from their own research fields both individually and in seminars. Through active participation in seminars, different ways of collecting/generating and analyzing qualitative data will be discussed and analysed. In addition, in the form of a written assignment, students will plan their own qualitative studies and describe how they would carry out an analysis. This course offers a hands-on opportunity for graduate students to experience the practice of qualitative research. The course will require a moderate investment of time, with academically necessary reading and writing, recurrent team discussions based on assignments, and individual fieldwork. Teaching is in English and in the form of a course introduction, lectures and seminars.
The content of the course is based on a selection of quality research methods for data generation and analysis that are often used within the administrative and policy sciences. Students will be given the opportunity to critically appraise quality research studies from their own research fields both individually and in seminars. Through active participation in seminars, different ways of collecting/generating and analyzing quarterly data will be discussed and analyzed. In addition, in the form of a written assignment, students will plan their own quality studies and describe how they would carry out an analysis. This course offers a hands-on opportunity for graduate students to experience the practice of quality research. The course will require a modern investment of time, with academically necessary reading and writing, recurrent team discussions Based on assignments, and individual fieldwork. Teaching is in English and in the form of a course introduction, lectures and seminars.
主要教科書
1. 謝國雄(1997)《純勞動：台灣勞動體制諸論》，台北：中研院社研所籌備處。
2. 謝國雄主編(2007)《以身為度、如是我做—田野工作的教與學》，台北：群學。
3. 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞主編(2015)《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》，台北：臺灣東華。
4. 胡幼慧主編(1996)《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，台北：巨流。
參考書
1. Alford, R.R.(1998)The Craft of Inquiry: Theories, Methods, Evidence. 王志弘譯(2011)，《好研究該怎麼做》，台北：群學。
2. Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., Williams, J.M.(2003)The Craft of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 陳美霞、徐畢卿、許甘霖譯(2009)《研究的藝術》，台北：巨流。
3. Sayer, A.(2010)Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. Revised 2nd.許甘霖、萬毓澤、楊友仁譯(2016)《社會科學的方法：實在論觀點》，台北：巨流。
4. 畢恆達，2006，《教授為什麼沒告訴我：論文寫作的枕邊書》* (二版)。台北：學富文化。
5. 郭佩宜、王宏仁編，2006，《田野的技藝：自我、研究與知識建構》*。台北：巨流。
Main textbooks
1. Xie Guoxiong (1997) "Pure Sports: Taiwan Movement System Procedure", Taipei: The Preparatory Office of the Institute of Social Research and Development of China Research Institute.
2. Thank you to Guoxiong (2007) "Teaching and Learning of Field Work with the Self as a Standard" by Guoxiong, Taipei: Group Studies.
3. Editor of Qu Haiyuan, Bihenda, Liu Changxuan, and Yang Guole (2015) "Social and Behavioral Research Methods: Quality Research Methods", Taipei: Taiwan Donghua.
4. Edited by Hu Youhui (1996) "Quality Research: Theory, Methods and Examples of Local Women's Research", Taipei: Juliu.
Reference book
1. Alford, R.R. (1998)The Craft of Inquiry: Theories, Methods, Evidence. Wang Zhihong (2011), "How to Do Good Research", Taipei: Group Studies.
2. Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., Williams, J.M. (2003) The Craft of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chen Meixia, Xu Biqing, Xu Ganlin Lu (2009) "Art of Research", Taipei: Juliu.
3. Sayer, A. (2010) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. Revised 2nd. Xu Ganlin, Wan Yuze, Yang Youren (2016) "Methods of Social Science: Intrinsic Views", Taipei: Juliu.
4. Diploma, 2006, "Why did the professor not tell me: The Pillow Book of Writing in Literature"* (Second Edition). Taipei: Learn to be rich in culture.
5. Educated by Guo Peiyi and Wang Hongren, 2006, "Teacher of Fields: Self, Research and Knowledge Construction"*. Taipei: The giant stream.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂出席、參與討論課堂出席、參與討論 Class attendance, participation and discussion |
15 | 視出席率以及提問、回答問題的積極度 |
| 三份個人Memo三份個人Memo Three personal memos |
10 | 兩分指定教材閱讀心得Memo，1000字以上，各3%；一份田野筆記Memo，1000字以上，4% |
| 個人期中報告個人期中報告 Personal midterm report |
15 | 2500字以上 |
| 個人期末報告個人期末報告 Personal final report |
18 | 3000字以上 |
