By employing the group project as a major learning strategy to activate independent, systematic thought and foresight, with a micro-implementation focus, this course provides a solid foundation and is expected to enable undergraduate students to:
(1)define the service problems or issues through needs assessment, data collection, data analysis, and data conclusions in relation to the societal conditions;
(2)employ group tactics in clarifying the service goals and making project decisions;
(3)respond to a need of seeking a development of recipe for self own method or a framework of project planning and evaluation; and,
(4)identify the pragmatic variables that influence project implementation, evaluation, and the exercise value.By employing the group project as a major learning strategy to activate independent, systematic thought and foresight, with a micro-implementation focus, this course provides a solid foundation and is expected to enable undergraduate students to:
(1) define the service problems or issues through needs assessment, data collection, data analysis, and data conclusions in relation to the societal conditions;
(2)employ group tactics in clarifying the service goals and making project decisions;
(3)respond to a need of seeking a development of recipe for self own method or a framework of project planning and evaluation; and,
(4)identify the pragmatic variables that influence project implementation, evaluation, and the exercise value.
This course is designed to prepare undergraduate students to develop the knowledge, skills and strategies required for grantsmanship in relation to project planning, proposal writing, service effect evaluation and fund application at the practice operational level. The course not only demystifies the grant-writing process by providing a guide but exposes students to a variety of potential sources and approaches for program or project implementation.
This course is designed to prepare undergraduate students to develop the knowledge, skills and strategies required for grantsmanship in relation to project planning, proposal writing, service effect evaluation and fund application at the practice operational level. The course not only demystifies the grant-writing process by providing a guide but exposes students to a variety of potential sources and approaches for program or project implementation.
(1)Coley, S. M., & Scheinberg, C. A. (2008). Proposal Writing: Effective
grantsmanship (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
（2）梁偉康（1997）。社會服務機構行政管理與實踐（一版四刷）。香港：集賢社。
（3）蔡啟源（2015）。方案規劃與評鑑。台北：雙葉。
（4） Handouts and relevant text materials as needed will be announced in the
class.
(1)Coley, S. M., & Scheinberg, C. A. (2008). Proposal Writing: Effective
grantsmanship (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
(2) Liang Weikang (1997). Administrative management and practice of social service agencies (four editions in one edition). Hong Kong: Jixian Society.
(3) Cai Qiyuan (2015). Program planning and evaluation. Taipei: Futaba.
(4) Handouts and relevant text materials as needed will be announced in the
class.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-term examinationMid-term examination mid-term examination |
15 | 期中考 |
| Final PresentationFinal Presentation final presentation |
25 | 期末學習成果總檢驗 |
| Group assignmentGroup assignment group assignment |
40 | 平常學習與設計練習 |
| Class attendance & participationClass attendance & participation class attendance & participation |
20 | 課堂參與、學習與體驗 |
