本課程旨在探討憲政主義(Constitutionalism)與民主政治(Democracy)之間的競合關係。蓋民主政治主張多數統治，憲政主義（Constitutionalism）則強調保障少數，兩者在本質上是相互衝突的。因此，如何在民主政治多數統治的基礎上來保障少數，即成為憲政民主（Constitutional Democracy）的主要爭議。本課程旨在說明這些爭議的所在，並介紹憲政民主的不同形態，以期學生具備相關的政治知識，分析判斷與公共服務的能力。This course aims to explore the competitive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. Democracy advocates majority rule, while constitutionalism emphasizes protecting minorities. The two are essentially in conflict with each other. Therefore, how to protect minorities on the basis of majority rule in democratic politics has become a major controversy in constitutional democracy. This course aims to explain these controversies and introduce different forms of constitutional democracy, with the aim of equipping students with relevant political knowledge, analytical judgment and public service capabilities.
探討憲政主義(Constitutionalism)與民主政治(Democracy)之間的競合關係。蓋民主政治主張多數統治，以維護多數意志，而憲政主義則強調限制多數，以保障少數權利，兩者在本質上是相互衝突的。因此，如何在民主政治多數統治的基礎上來保障少數，即成為憲政民主（Constitutional Democracy）的主要爭議。本課程旨在說明這些爭議的所在，並介紹憲政民主的不同形態，以期學生具備相關的政治專業知識，決策分析與學術研究的能力。
Discuss the competitive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. Democracy advocates majority rule to safeguard the will of the majority, while constitutionalism emphasizes limiting the majority to protect minority rights. The two are essentially in conflict with each other. Therefore, how to protect minorities on the basis of majority rule in democratic politics has become a major controversy in constitutional democracy. This course aims to explain these controversies and introduce different forms of constitutional democracy, with the aim of equipping students with relevant political expertise, decision-making analysis and academic research capabilities.
(1) 任冀平（2014），＜司法審查存立的制度性基礎＞，（全球政治評論）第48期，頁27~62。
(2) 任冀平（2011），＜法院與政治：美國司法政治初探＞，（全球政治評論）第33期，頁73~95。
(3) 吳玉山 （2011），＜半總統制：全球發展與研究議程＞，（政治科學論叢）第47期，頁1~32。
(4) 吳重禮（2006），＜美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啟示＞，（問題與研究）第45卷第3期，頁133~166。
(5) 黃秀端、何嵩婷（2007），＜黨團協商與國會立法：第五屆立法院的分析＞，（政治科學論叢）第34期，頁1~44。
(6) 黃秀端（2003），＜少數政府在國會的困境＞，（台灣政治學刊）第七卷第二 期，頁3-49。
(7) 郝培芝 (2013)，＜半總統制的演化：總統話與內閣不穩定＞，（問題與研究）第52卷第1期，頁101~141。
(8) 張峻豪（2011），＜ 半總統制運作類型的跨國研究＞，（問題與研究）第50卷第2期，頁107~142。
(9) 蘇子喬、王業立（2012），＜總統與國會選制影響政黨體系的跨國分析＞，（問題與研究）第51卷第4期，頁35~70。
(10) 蘇子喬（2010），＜憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考＞，（政治科學論叢）第44期，頁35~74。
(11) 廖達琪、陳月卿、李承訓（2013），＜半總統制下的國會監督－從法制面比較台灣與法國國會的監督能量＞，（問題與研究）第52卷第2期，頁51~97。
(12) 廖達琪（2005），＜「橡皮圖章」如何轉變為「河東獅吼」？──立法院在台灣民主化過程中角色轉變之探究（1950-2000）＞，（人文及社會科學集刊）第17卷第2期，頁343~391。
(13) 蕭怡靖（2005），＜我國立法院資深制度之探討—委員會遊走及召集委員資深度之變遷＞，（政治科學論叢）第25期，頁105~134。
(14) 韓保中（2007），＜憲政與行政：論威爾遜＜行政的研究＞的緣起與意義＞，（政治科學論叢）第34期，頁105~150。
(1) Ren Jiping (2014), "The Institutional Basis for the Existence of Judicial Review", (Global Politics Review) No. 48, pp. 27~62.
(2) Ren Jiping (2011), "Courts and Politics: A Preliminary Study of American Judicial Politics", (Global Politics Review) No. 33, pp. 73~95.
(3) Wu Yushan (2011), "Semi-presidentialism: Global Development and Research Agenda", (Political Science Series), Issue 47, pp. 1~32.
(4) Wu Chongli (2006), "The operational experience of divided government in the United States and its implications", (Issue and Research), Volume 45, Issue 3, pp. 133~166.
(5) Huang Xiuduan and He Songting (2007), "Party Negotiation and Congressional Legislation: Analysis of the Fifth Legislative Yuan", (Political Science Series), Issue 34, pp. 1~44.
(6) Huang Xiuduan (2003), "The Dilemma of the Minority Government in Congress", (Taiwan Political Science Journal), Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 3-49.
(7) Hao Peizhi (2013), "The Evolution of Semi-Presidential System: Presidential Talk and Cabinet Instability", (Issue and Research), Volume 52, Issue 1, pp. 101~141.
(8) Zhang Junhao (2011), "Cross-national Research on the Operation Type of Semi-presidential System", (Issue and Research), Volume 50, Issue 2, pp. 107~142.
(9) Su Ziqiao and Wang Yeli (2012), "A cross-national analysis of the impact of presidential and congressional election systems on party systems", (Issue and Research), Volume 51, Issue 4, pp. 35~70.
(10) Su Ziqiao (2010), "Thoughts on supporting the constitutional system and electoral system", (Political Science Series), Issue 44, pp. 35~74.
(11) Liao Daqi, Chen Yueqing, and Li Chengxun (2013), "Congress Supervision under Semi-Presidential System - Comparing the Supervision Energy of Taiwan and France Congresses from the Legal Aspects", (Issue and Research), Volume 52, Issue 2, pp. 51~97 .
(12) Liao Daqi (2005), "How does a "rubber stamp" transform into a "Hedong lion's roar"? ──An exploration of the changing role of the Legislative Yuan in the process of Taiwan's democratization (1950-2000)>, (Humanities and Social Sciences), Volume 17, Issue 2, pp. 343~391.
(13) Xiao Yijing (2005), "A Discussion on the Seniority System of my country's Legislative Yuan - Changes in the Seniority of Committee Roaming and Convening Members", (Political Science Series), Issue 25, pp. 105~134.
(14) Han Baozhong (2007), "Constitutionalism and Administration: On the Origin and Significance of Wilson's "Research on Administration"", (Political Science Series), Issue 34, pp. 105~150.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 出席上課出席上課 attend class |
5 | |
| 報告報告 report |
33 | |
| 期中考期中考 midterm exam |
33 | |
| 期末考期末考 final exam |
33 |
