本課程乃是政治研究所博士班與碩士班的必修課程。其內容主要在探討憲政主義(Constitutionalism)與民主政治(Democracy)之間的競合關係。蓋民主政治主張多數統治，以維護多數意志，而憲政主義則強調限制多數，以保障少數權利，兩者在本質上是相互衝突的。因此，如何在民主政治多數統治的基礎上來保障少數，即成為憲政民主（Constitutional Democracy）的主要爭議。本課程旨在說明這些爭議的所在，並介紹憲政民主的不同形態，以期學生具備相關的政治專業知識，決策分析與學術研究的能力。This course is a compulsory course for the doctoral and master's programs of the Institute of Political Science. Its content mainly explores the competitive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. Democracy advocates majority rule to safeguard the will of the majority, while constitutionalism emphasizes limiting the majority to protect minority rights. The two are essentially in conflict with each other. Therefore, how to protect minorities on the basis of majority rule in democratic politics has become a major controversy in constitutional democracy. This course aims to explain these controversies and introduce different forms of constitutional democracy, with the aim of equipping students with relevant political expertise, decision-making analysis and academic research capabilities.
本課程乃是政治研究所博士班與碩士班的必修課程。其內容主要在探討憲政主義(Constitutionalism)與民主政治(Democracy)之間的競合關係。蓋民主政治主張多數統治，以維護多數意志，而憲政主義則強調限制多數，以保障少數權利，兩者在本質上是相互衝突的。因此，如何在民主政治多數統治的基礎上來保障少數，即成為憲政民主（Constitutional Democracy）的主要爭議。本課程旨在說明這些爭議的所在，並介紹憲政民主的不同形態，以期學生具備相關的政治專業知識，決策分析與學術研究的能力。
This course is a compulsory course for the doctoral and master's programs of the Institute of Political Science. Its content mainly explores the competitive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. Democracy advocates majority rule to safeguard the will of the majority, while constitutionalism emphasizes limiting the majority to protect minority rights. The two are essentially in conflict with each other. Therefore, how to protect minorities on the basis of majority rule in democratic politics has become a major controversy in constitutional democracy. This course aims to explain these controversies and introduce different forms of constitutional democracy, with the aim of equipping students with relevant political expertise, decision-making analysis and academic research capabilities.
(1) Cheibub, Jose Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2) Clucas, Richard A. and Melody Ellis Valdini. 2015. The Character of Democracy: How Institutions Shape Politics. New York: Oxford University.
(3) Elgie, Robert. ed. 1999. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. New York: Oxford University.
(4) Elgie, Robert. ed. 2001. Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
(5) Muller, Wolfgang C. and Kaare Strom. eds. 2003. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
(6) Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(7) 任冀平（2011），＜法院與政治：美國司法政治初探＞，（全球政治評論）第33期，頁73~95。
(8) 吳玉山 （2011），＜半總統制：全球發展與研究議程＞，（政治科學論叢）第47期，頁1~32。
(9) 吳重禮（2006），＜美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啟示＞，（問題與研究）第45卷第3期，頁133~166。
(10) 郝培芝 (2013)，＜半總統制的演化：總統話與內閣不穩定＞，（問題與研究）第52卷第1期，頁101~141。
(11) 郝培芝 (2010)，＜法國半總統制的演化：法國2008年修憲的憲政影響分析＞，（問題與研究）第49卷第2期，頁65~98。
(12) 張峻豪（2011），＜ 半總統制運作類型的跨國研究＞，（問題與研究）第50卷第2期，頁107~142。
(13) 廖達琪、陳月卿、李承訓（2013），＜半總統制下的國會監督－從法制面比較台灣與法國國會的監督能量＞，（問題與研究）第52卷第2期，頁51~97。
(14) 陳宏銘、蔡榮祥（2008），＜選舉時程對政府組成型態的牽引力：半總統制經驗之探討＞，（東吳政治學報）第26卷第2期，頁117~180。
(15) 彭錦鵬，（2001），＜總統制是可取的制度嗎？＞，（政治科學論叢）第十四期，頁75-106。
(16) 黃秀端（2003），＜少數政府在國會的困境＞，（台灣政治學刊）第7卷第2期，頁3~49。
(17) 蘇子喬（2010），＜憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考＞，（政治科學論叢）第44期，頁35~74。
(18) 韓保中（2007），＜憲政與行政：論威爾遜＜行政的研究＞的緣起與意義＞，（政治科學論叢）第34期，頁105~150。
(1) Cheibub, Jose Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2) Clucas, Richard A. and Melody Ellis Valdini. 2015. The Character of Democracy: How Institutions Shape Politics. New York: Oxford University.
(3) Elgie, Robert. ed. 1999. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. New York: Oxford University.
(4) Elgie, Robert. ed. 2001. Divided Government in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
(5) Muller, Wolfgang C. and Kaare Strom. eds. 2003. Coalition Governments in Western Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
(6) Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(7) Ren Jiping (2011), "Courts and Politics: A Preliminary Study of American Judicial Politics", (Global Politics Review) No. 33, pp. 73~95.
(8) Wu Yushan (2011), "Semi-presidentialism: Global Development and Research Agenda", (Political Science Series), Issue 47, pp. 1~32.
(9) Wu Chongli (2006), "The Operational Experience and Enlightenment of the United States' Divided Government", (Issue and Research), Volume 45, Issue 3, pp. 133~166.
(10) Hao Peizhi (2013), "The Evolution of Semi-Presidential System: Presidential Talk and Cabinet Instability", (Issue and Research), Volume 52, Issue 1, pp. 101~141.
(11) Hao Peizhi (2010), "The Evolution of French Semi-Presidential System: Analysis of the Constitutional Impact of France's 2008 Constitutional Amendment", (Issue and Research), Volume 49, Issue 2, pp. 65~98.
(12) Zhang Junhao (2011), "Cross-national Research on the Operation Type of Semi-presidential System", (Issue and Research), Volume 50, Issue 2, pp. 107~142.
(13) Liao Daqi, Chen Yueqing, and Li Chengxun (2013), "Congress Supervision under Semi-Presidential System - Comparing the Supervision Energy of Taiwan and France Congresses from the Legal Aspects", (Issue and Research), Volume 52, Issue 2, pp. 51~97 .
(14) Chen Hongming and Cai Rongxiang (2008), "The pulling power of election schedule on government composition types: An exploration of the experience of semi-presidential system", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 26, Issue 2, pp. 117~180.
(15) Peng Jinpeng, (2001),
(16) Huang Xiuduan (2003), "The Dilemma of the Minority Government in Congress", (Taiwan Political Science Journal), Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 3~49.
(17) Su Ziqiao (2010), "Thoughts on supporting the constitutional system and electoral system", (Political Science Series), Issue 44, pp. 35~74.
(18) Han Baozhong (2007), "Constitutionalism and Administration: On the Origin and Significance of Wilson's "Research on Administration"", (Political Science Series), Issue 34, pp. 105~150.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平時成績平時成績 usual results |
60 | 書面及口頭報告,並參與討論 |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
40 |
