6324 - 憲政民主專題

Seminar on Constitutional Democracy

教育目標 Course Target

本課程主要的目的是讓同學可以深入探究比較憲政制度的核心議題,並藉由研究方法的運用來進行獨立的憲政研究,撰寫相關的研究計畫和論文。主要的課程內容是比較憲政研究、美國憲政民主、半總統制民主、憲政研究的論文寫作。

The main purpose of this course is to enable students to delve deeply into the core issues of comparative constitutionalism, conduct independent constitutional research through the application of research methods, and write related research plans and papers. The main course contents are comparative constitutional studies, American constitutional democracy, semi-presidential democracy, and thesis writing of constitutional studies.

參考書目 Reference Books

請參考教學進度(Course Schedule)部分,以確認相關內容安排。

比較憲政研究 I
1.Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference,” in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp.3-87.
2.Stephen Van Evera, 1997. “How to Write a Paper,” in Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science, Appendix.
3.Stephen Van Evera, 1997. “The Dissertation Proposal,” in Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press): 115-116.


比較憲政研究II
1.蔡榮祥,2014,〈總統和國會的權力抗衡與民主運作之成敗:以拉丁美洲兩黨總統制國家為例〉,《問題與研究》,53(2):1-30(TSSCI)。
2.蔡榮祥,2017,〈議會制與民主瓦解:以第二波民主化國家為例〉,《全球政治評論》,57:25-59。
3.John Stuart Mill, 2000. A System of Logic: Rationcinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. J M. Robson (ed). Routledge Press. Chapter VIII, pp. 388-406.


比較半總統制研究
1.蔡榮祥,2021,〈半總統制總統化和議會化的權力平衡、路徑依賴與憲政運作〉,《行政暨政策學報》,73(2):49-88(TSSCI)。
2.Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2005. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics, 3(3): 323-351.
3.Richard M. Locke and Kathleen Thelen, 1995. “Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics,” Politics and Society 23(3):337-367.

比較總理總統制
1.蔡榮祥、石鵬翔, 2011,〈總理總統制與政治穩定:以烏克蘭與羅馬尼亞為例〉,《政治科學論叢》,47(2):65-106(TSSCI)。
2.蔡榮祥,2013,〈多黨總理總統制民主的政府類型與憲政運作的衝突-以斯洛伐克、斯洛維尼亞、克羅埃西亞、立陶宛為例〉,《東吳政治學報》,31(3): 65-116(TSSCI)。

比較總統國會制
1.蔡榮祥,2018,〈總統國會制權力行使、支持基礎與民主運作〉,《東吳政治學報》,36(3): 59-129。
2.蔡榮祥,2018,〈總統和國會的權力平衡與憲政衝突:以總統國會制國家秘魯、俄羅斯、喬治亞和葡萄牙為例〉
3.蔡榮祥,2023,〈多黨總統國會制民主的內閣類型、國會支持和政治衝突〉,《台灣民主季刊》,20(1): 57-97(TSSCI)。

憲政體制與選舉制度
1.陳宏銘、蔡榮祥,2008,〈選舉時程對政府組成型態的牽引力:半總統制經驗之探討〉,《東吳政治學報》,26(2): 117-180)。
2.蘇子喬、王業立,2018,〈選舉制度與憲政體制的制度組合—半總統制國家的跨國分析〉,《選舉研究》,25(1):1-36。


台灣半總統制運作之比較
1.蔡榮祥,2017,〈半總統制下總統、總理和國會的三角關係:台灣和波蘭的運作經驗分析〉,《東吳政治學報》,35(2):1-71。
2.Wu, Yu-shan. 2000. “The ROC’s Semipresidentialism at

Please refer to the Course Schedule section to confirm the relevant content arrangements.

Comparative Constitutional Studies I
1.Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference,” in Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, eds. The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp.3-87.
2.Stephen Van Evera, 1997. “How to Write a Paper,” in Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science, Appendix.
3.Stephen Van Evera, 1997. “The Dissertation Proposal,” in Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Ithaca: Cornell University Press): 115-116.


Comparative Constitutional Studies II
1. Cai Rongxiang, 2014, "The Power Confrontation between the President and Congress and the Success or Failure of Democratic Operations: Taking Latin American Two-Party Presidential Systems as an Example", Issues and Research, 53(2):1-30 (TSSCI).
2. Cai Rongxiang, 2017, "Parliamentarism and the Collapse of Democracy: Taking the Second Wave of Democratic Countries as an Example", "Global Politics Review", 57: 25-59.
3. John Stuart Mill, 2000. A System of Logic: Rationcinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. J M. Robson (ed). Routledge Press. Chapter VIII, pp. 388-406.


Comparative study of semi-presidential systems
1. Cai Rongxiang, 2021, "Power balance, path dependence and constitutional operation of semi-presidential system and presidentialization and parliamentary system", "Journal of Administration and Policy", 73 (2): 49-88 (TSSCI).
2. Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2005. “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns.” French Politics, 3(3): 323-351.
3.Richard M. Locke and Kathleen Thelen, 1995. "Apples and Oranges Revisited: Contextualized Comparisons and the Study of Comparative Labor Politics," Politics and Society 23(3):337-367.

Comparing Prime Ministerial Presidential Systems
1. Cai Rongxiang and Shi Pengxiang, 2011, "Prime Ministerial Presidential System and Political Stability: Taking Ukraine and Romania as Examples", "Political Science Forum", 47(2): 65-106 (TSSCI).
2. Cai Rongxiang, 2013, "The conflict between the government type and constitutional operation of multi-party prime ministerial presidential democracy - taking Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, and Lithuania as examples", "Journal of Soochow Political Science", 31(3): 65-116 (TSSCI).

Comparing Presidential Congressional Systems
1. Cai Rongxiang, 2018, "Exercise of Power, Support Foundation and Democratic Operation of the Presidential Congress System", "Journal of Soochow Political Science", 36(3): 59-129.
2. Cai Rongxiang, 2018, "The balance of power and constitutional conflict between the president and Congress: A case study of Peru, Russia, Georgia and Portugal, countries with presidential parliamentary systems"
3. Cai Rongxiang, 2023, "Cabinet Type, Congressional Support, and Political Conflict in Multiparty Presidential Congressional Democracy", "Taiwan Democracy Quarterly", 20(1): 57-97 (TSSCI).

Constitutional system and electoral system
1. Chen Hongming and Cai Rongxiang, 2008, "The pulling power of the election schedule on the government composition type: An exploration of the experience of semi-presidential system", "Journal of Soochow Political Science", 26(2): 117-180).
2. Su Ziqiao and Wang Yeli, 2018, "The Institutional Combination of Electoral Systems and Constitutional Systems—A Cross-National Analysis of Semi-presidential Countries", "Electoral Research", 25 (1): 1-36.


A comparison of the operation of Taiwan’s semi-presidential system
1. Cai Rongxiang, 2017, "The triangular relationship between the president, prime minister and parliament under the semi-presidential system: Analysis of operational experience in Taiwan and Poland", "Journal of Soochow Political Science", 35(2): 1-71.
2. Wu, Yu-shan. 2000. “The ROC’s Semipresidentialism at

評分方式 Grading

評分項目
Grading Method
配分比例
Percentage
說明
Description
課堂參與
class participation
10
期中研究報告
Interim Research Report
40
期末研究報告
Final research report
50

授課大綱 Course Plan

點擊下方連結查看詳細授課大綱
Click the link below to view the detailed course plan

查看授課大綱 View Course Plan

相似課程 Related Courses

無相似課程 No related courses found

課程資訊 Course Information

基本資料 Basic Information

  • 課程代碼 Course Code: 6324
  • 學分 Credit: 3-0
  • 上課時間 Course Time:
    Friday/2,3,4[SS427]
  • 授課教師 Teacher:
    蔡榮祥/蔡舒安
  • 修課班級 Class:
    政理碩1
  • 選課備註 Memo:
    碩士班政治理論組必修,碩士班先修生下載政治系人工加選單加選修課
選課狀態 Enrollment Status

目前選課人數 Current Enrollment: 8 人

交換生/外籍生選課登記

請點選上方按鈕加入登記清單,再等候任課教師審核。
Add this class to your wishlist by clicking the button above.