本課程目的在，將同學在「善與義務」相關課程中學到的內容進行整合與討論。課程進行方式：經授課老師引領切入相關規範理論與議題，進行小組與具體的議題討論。具體而言，在全球發展倫理學的視野下切入，因為貧窮、漸漸惡化的不平等現象、暴力、環境危機與暴政持續肆虐整個世界，這些難題引發我們對善與義務的全面反思。發展倫理學強調的是人類的能動性（agency）對於善與義務追求的重要性，重點是人不應該被環境與偶然性宰制，除了基本生存需求外，人的善應該包括休閒、情感與精神層面的滿足。在多大程度上社會安全網有被提供的義務，卻不會忽略了個人的能動性與個人的責任？這意味著，人有追求各自的善（人生規劃）的自由，人們必須要被賦予基礎、相當與對應的能力才能進行這些追求，這些能力與相關的義務如何理解，課程中將陸續探討。The purpose of this course is to integrate and discuss the content learned by classmates in the "Good and Morality" course. How to proceed with the course: Instructors lead to relevant regulations and discussions, and conduct group discussions with specific issues. Specifically, these difficulties have led to our comprehensive reflection on good and morality in the perspective of global development ethics, as indifference, violent, environmental crisis and tyranny continue to rage the entire world. The development of ethics emphasizes the importance of human agency to the pursuit of goodness and morality. The point is that people should not be dominated by environment and accidentality. In addition to basic survival needs, human kindness should include leisure, emotional and spiritual aspects. satisfaction. To what extent does Social Security Network have the obligations that are provided to not ignore personal ability and personal responsibility? This means that people have the freedom to pursue their own goodness (life planning), and people must be entrusted with basic, corresponding and corresponding abilities to carry out these pursuits. How to understand these abilities and related responsibilities will continue to be explored in the course.
Martha C. Nussbaum（楊雅婷等翻譯）：《正義的界限: 殘障、全球正義與動物正義》，臺北市：韋伯文化國際出版有限公司，2008。
David Crocker: Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy，Cambridge University Press，2009
Martha C. Nussbaum (translated by Yang Yating et al): "The Boundary of Righteousness: Barrier, Global Righteousness and Animal Righteousness", Taipei City: Weibo Culture International Publishing Co., Ltd., 2008.
David Crocker: Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 2009
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 出席出席 Attend |
20 | 每出席一次一分，全勤20分。 |
| 課堂報告課堂報告 Class Report |
30 | |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
40 |
