Home
社會工作學系
course information of 113 - 1 | 6507 Family Caregiver and Social Welfare(家庭照顧者與社會福利)

6507 - 家庭照顧者與社會福利 Family Caregiver and Social Welfare


教育目標 Course Target

1.瞭解臺灣家庭照顧者的輪廓、特徵與趨勢。 2.瞭解臺灣家庭照顧者的需要與問題。 3.瞭解與家庭照顧者有關的福利服務措施及政策。 4.瞭解家庭照顧者服務使用的理論與觀點。 5.瞭解與家庭照顧者有關的研究資料內容及其限制。1. Understand the profile, characteristics and trends of Taiwanese family caregivers. 2. Understand the needs and problems of Taiwanese family caregivers. 3. Understand welfare service measures and policies related to family caregivers. 4. Understand the theories and views of the use of family caregivers’ services. 5. Understand the content and limitations of research data related to family caregivers.


課程概述 Course Description

家庭照顧工作是件勞心又勞力的工作,家庭照顧者的工作內容之複雜及沈重並不亞於一般專業照顧者,且家庭照顧者通常是無酬家屬工作,在情緒負荷上亦遠高於一般專業照顧者,有關壓力的疏解管道亦相當缺乏,其壓力之重,不言可喻。而隨著臺灣快速的人口轉型現象,家庭照顧者的數量有日益增加趨勢,如何適當地裝備、保護與支持這一群重要的家庭照顧人力,將是政府未來相關福利措施須積極謀思之處。基於此,本課程除將閱讀有關家庭照顧者的基本特徵、照顧壓力、工作內容及相關論點外,亦將討論目前國內有關家庭照顧者的相關支持措施及其限制,期透過課程讓修課學者對於家庭照顧者及其相關處境有更深入的瞭解,促發未來參與或更進一步學習的意願。
Family care is a laborious and laborious job. The complex and heavy work content of family caregivers is not as complicated as that of ordinary professional caregivers. Family caregivers are usually unpaid for family work, and are also far higher than that of ordinary in terms of emotional burden. Professional caregivers also lack pressure relief pipelines, and the heavy pressure is self-evident. With Taiwan's rapid population transformation phenomenon, the number of family caregivers is increasing trends. How to adapt, protect and support this important group of family caregivers locally will be a place where the government's future related welfare measures need to be extremely considerate. Based on this, in addition to reading the basic characteristics, care pressure, work content and related discussions about family caregivers, this course will also discuss relevant support measures and restrictions on family caregivers in China, and will allow students to take the course through the course. Have a deeper understanding of family caregivers and their related situations to promote future participation or further learning.


參考書目 Reference Books

Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 21372 84
Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. Journal of health and social behavior, 36(1), 1-10.
Bass, D. M., & Noelker, L. S. (1987). The influence of family caregivers on elder's use of in-home services: An expanded conceptual framework. Journal of health and social behavior,28(2), 184-196.
Brodaty, H., Thomson, C., Thompson, C., & Fine, M. (2005). Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don't use services. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 20(6), 537-546.
Calsyn, R. J., & Roades, L. A. (1994). Predicting perceived service need, service awareness, and service utilization. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21(1-2), 59-76.
Chiu, T. M., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Stages of use: consideration, initiation, utilization, and outcomes of an internet-mediated intervention. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 10(1), 1-11.
Chiu, T. M., & Eysenbach, G. (2011). Theorizing the health service usage behavior of family caregivers: a qualitative study of an internet-based intervention. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(11), 754-764.
Choi, H., Maija Reblin, Kristin Litzelman(2023). Conceptualizing Family Caregivers’ Use of Community Support Services: A Scoping Review, The Gerontologist, 2023; gnad039, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad039
Chou, K. R. (2000). Caregiver burden: a concept analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 15(6), 398-407.
Crist, J. D., & Speaks, P. (2011). Keeping it in the family: when Mexican American older adults choose not to use home healthcare services. Home Healthcare Nurse, 29, 282 – 290.
Friedemann, M. L., & Buckwalter, K. C. (2014). Family caregiver role and burden related to gender and family relationships. Journal of family nursing, 20(3), 313-3
Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2307/ 21372 84
Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?. Journal of health and social behavior, 36(1), 1-10.
Bass, D. M., & Noelker, L. S. (1987). The influence of family caregivers on elder's use of in-home services: An expanded conceptual framework. Journal of health and social behavior,28(2), 184-196.
Brodaty, H., Thomson, C., Thompson, C., & Fine, M. (2005). Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don't use services. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 20(6), 537-546.
Calsyn, R. J., & Roades, L. A. (1994). Predicting perceived service need, service awareness, and service utilization. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 21(1-2), 59-76.
Chiu, T. M., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Stages of use: consideration, initiative, utilization, and outcomes of an internet-mediated intervention. BMC medical information and decision making, 10(1), 1-11. /> Chiu, T. M., & Eysenbach, G. (2011). Theorizing the health service usage behavior of family caregivers: a qualified study of an internet-based intervention. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(11), 754-764.
Choi, H., Maija Reblin, Kristin Litzelman(2023). Conceptualizing Family Caregivers' Use of Community Support Services: A Scoping Review, The Gerontologist, 2023; gnad039, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad039
Chou, K. R. (2000). Caregiver burden: a concept analysis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 15(6), 398-407.
Crist, J. D., & Speaks, P. (2011). Keeping it in the family: when Mexican American older adults choose not to use home healthcare services. Home Healthcare Nurse, 29, 282 – 290.
Friedemann, M. L., & Buckwalter, K. C. (2014). Family caregiver role and burden related to gender and family relations. Journal of family nursery, 20(3), 313-3


評分方式 Grading

評分項目 Grading Method 配分比例 Grading percentage 說明 Description
課堂報告課堂報告
Class Report
50 每次10分
研究報告研究報告
Research Report
50 每次25分

授課大綱 Course Plan

Click here to open the course plan. Course Plan
交換生/外籍生選課登記 - 請點選下方按鈕加入登記清單,再等候任課教師審核。
Add this class to your wishlist by click the button below.
請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first


相似課程 Related Course

很抱歉,沒有符合條件的課程。 Sorry , no courses found.

Course Information

Description

學分 Credit:3-0
上課時間 Course Time:Tuesday/6,7,8[SS302]
授課教師 Teacher:呂朝賢
修課班級 Class:社工博1,2
選課備註 Memo:不開放推廣部附讀
授課大綱 Course Plan: Open

選課狀態 Attendance

There're now 4 person in the class.
目前選課人數為 4 人。

請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first