本課程旨協助碩士班同學認識社會科學領域常用的質化研究方法，及其優缺點與限制，並藉以運用來掌握研究議題的資訊。本課程除了綜合性介紹質化分析的相關概念與理論之外，更希望同學們將上課所學習到概念與方法，藉由用以檢視使用質性方法的研究論文或報告，以及實際運用到撰寫的論文報告中，透過理論與實際相互印證的方式，培養同學實際執行質化研究的能力。
老師會對重要的理論與概念，作必要的說明與補充，但課堂的進行方式，是以老師講授同學報告與討論各半。每位學生至少選擇兩週次主題做30分鐘左右的引言，進而導讀當週閱讀文獻，並引導問題的討論。除此，每位學生必須在修課期間實際設計與執行一小型質化研究，依次繳交研究主題、研究背景與目的、研究對象範圍與問題、文獻檢閱、訪談逐字與整理稿、初具學術格式的研究全文等作業，過程中並逐次學習評論他人的研究設計、方法與成果。This course aims to help students in the graduate class to understand the commonly used quality research methods in the social science field, their advantages, disadvantages and limitations, and use them to master the information on research topics. In addition to comprehensively introducing the relevant concepts and theoretical discussions of quality analysis, this course hopes that students will learn concepts and methods in the course, through research papers or reports used to view quality methods, and practically use them to write In the paper report, through the method of mutual identification of theory and actuality, we cultivate the ability of students to actually carry out quality research.
Teachers will give necessary explanations and supplements to important theories and concepts, but the way in which the classroom is conducted is to teach students half of the reports and discussions by teachers. Each student chooses at least two weeks to give a 30-minute introduction to the topic, and then guides the reading of the article and the discussion of the problem. In addition, each student must actually design and perform a small-scale research during the course of study, and submit the research topic, research background and purpose, research object scope and problem, document review, visit verbatim and draft, and initial preparation. In the process, we will gradually learn and evaluate others' research designs, methods and achievements.
林淑馨（2010）。質性研究：理論與實務。台北：巨流。
陳俊明（審閱）（2015）。研究方法：專案實作入門手冊（Uwe Flick原著）。台北：雙葉。
胡幼慧（2008）。質性研究的分析與寫成。載於胡幼慧（編）質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（133-142頁）。台北：巨流。
林秀雲（譯）（2013）。社會科學研究方法（Earl Babbie原著）。台北：雙葉。
黃國光（譯）（2014）。研究方法：入門與實務（Ranjit Kumar原著）。台北：雙葉。
張芬芬（譯）（2005）。撰寫報告。質性研究資料分析（Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman原著）（623-646頁）。台北：雙葉。
郭姿吟、呂錦媛（譯）（2009）。這才是做研究的王道（Howard S. Becker原著）。新北市：群學。
朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會研究方法－質化與量化取向（W. Lawrence Neuman原著）。台北：揚智。
齊力（2006）。質性研究方法概論。載於齊力、林本炫（編）質性研究方法與資料分析（1-19頁）。嘉義縣：南華大學教育社會學研究所。
Lin Shuxin (2010). Quality study: theory and practice. Taipei: The giant stream.
Chen Junming (reviewed) (2015). Research method: Project implementation and entry manual (original work by Uwe Flick). Taipei: Double Leaf.
Hu Youhui (2008). Analysis and writing of quality research. Read in Hu Youhui (edited) Quality study: Theories, methods and examples of local women's research (pages 133-142). Taipei: The giant stream.
Lin Xiuyun (Reprinted) (2013). Social Science Research Methods (Original by Earl Babbie). Taipei: Double Leaf.
Huang Guoguang (Reprint) (2014). Research method: entry and practice (original work by Ranjit Kumar). Taipei: Double Leaf.
Zhang Fenfen (Reprinted) (2005). Write a report. Analysis of quality research data (original work by Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman) (pages 623-646). Taipei: Double Leaf.
Guo Ziyin and Mun Yuan (Reprint) (2009). This is the kingly way to do research (original by Howard S. Becker). New Taipei City: Group studies.
Zhu Rouru (translation) (2000). Social research methods - quality and quantitative orientation (original by W. Lawrence Neuman). Taipei: Sharp wisdom.
Qili (2006). Overview of quality research methods. Read in Qili and Lin Benxuan (edited) quality research methods and data analysis (pages 1-19). Chiayi County: Institute of Education and Social Sciences at Nanhua University.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂作業＋討論課堂作業＋討論 Classroom Works + Discussion |
70 | |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
30 |
