1. To inspire students' sense of aesthetic appreciation and perception of innovation values for humanities. Examples of this philosophical
argument will be introduced.
2. To clarify why there is a need of innovation for humanities. Literature review will be delivered for discussion in class.
3. To disentangle why the innovative motivation for humanities has been left behind. Critical argument on what contributes to several
phenomena of anti-social outcomes and inappropriate physical settings will be debated.
4. To debate what issues of humanistic innovation could be. Major issues related to cross-disciplinary and/or cross-culture would be
analyzed.
5. To explore cross-disciplinary and/or cross-culture projects focusing on innovation for humanities. Students' creative proposals would be
appreciated. 1. To inspire students' sense of aesthetic appreciation and perception of innovative values for humanities. Examples of this philosophical
argument will be introduced.
2. To clarify why there is a need of innovation for humanities. Literature review will be delivered for discussion in class.
3. To disentangle why the innovative motivation for humanities has been left behind. Critical argument on what contributes to several
phenomena of anti-social outcomes and inappropriate physical settings will be debated.
4. To debate what issues of humanistic innovation could be. Major issues related to cross-disciplinary and/or cross-culture would be
analyzed.
5. To explore cross-disciplinary and/or cross-culture projects focusing on innovation for humanities. Students' creative proposals would be
appreciated.
1. Heidegger, M., "Building, Dwelling, Thinking", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 100-119, Routledge, London.
2. Derrida, J., "Architecture where the desire may live", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 319-323, Routledge, London.
3. Derrida, J., "Point De Folie-Maintenant L'Architecture", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 324-336, Routledge, London.
4. Derrida, J., "What Comes before the Question?",
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2bPTs8fspk
5. Fieldoffice Architects + Huang Sheng-Yuan, 2015, Living In Place, Toru Kato, Japan.
1. Heidegger, M., "Building, Dwelling, Thinking", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 100-119, Routledge, London.
2. Derrida, J., "Architecture where the desire may live", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 319-323, Routledge, London.
3. Derrida, J., "Point De Folie-Maintenant L'Architecture", Rethinking Architecture- a Reader
in Cultural Theory, Leach, N., 2001, pp 324-336, Routledge, London.
4. Derrida, J., "What Comes before the Question?",
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2bPTs8fspk
5. Fieldoffice Architects + Huang Sheng-Yuan, 2015, Living In Place, Toru Kato, Japan.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly Attendance and ParticipationWeekly Attendance and Participation weekly attendance and participation |
20 | Students are encouraged to join the debate in class. |
| Mid-term PresentationMid-term Presentation mid-term presentation |
30 | Presentation should be in English. |
| Final PresentationFinal Presentation final presentation |
40 | Presentation should be in English. Portfolio should be submitted on time. |
| Self-learning PerformanceSelf-learning Performance self-learning performance |
10 | Organized by the General Education Center |
