1.本課程首先介紹收養與其特別法,婚生子女與非婚生子女就繼承等權益上之區別,監護及輔助宣告制度及受監護及輔助宣告者之繼承能力與其相關法律問題.其次,就繼承編,繼承施行法,及相關特別法,如保險法,台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例,祭祀公業條例,公證法及家事事件法為有關規定配合說明;並介紹相關外國立法例,大法官會議解釋如771/728/712/668/437等,及實務見解等.最後,本課程就繼承權,遺產繼承人,繼承之標的,共同繼承,繼承人之限定責任/拋棄繼承/法定單純承認,遺囑,遺贈與特留分等為說明.
2.繼承法係為規範基於身分關係對於因繼承所生財產上之權利義務關係.其立法目的及精神,一方面確保繼承人生存權,人格權,平等權,財產權,另一方面亦應兼顧債權人之財產權及社會交易安全等權益.
3.1931年制定之我國民法採當然繼承主義,繼承人如未於法定期間內辦理限定或拋棄繼承,原則上須承受被繼承人財產上之一切權利與義務,但專屬於被繼承人之權利義務則非屬繼承之範圍.自1931年制定施行以來,歷經數次修法,主要有2008年及2009年六月之修法,2009年六月之修法將原以概括繼承為原則,限定繼承及拋棄繼承例外之繼承制度,修正為以繼承人負限定責任為原則,拋棄繼承為例外.換言之,繼承人除拋棄繼承外,雖概括承受被繼承人財產上一切權利及義務,但對於被繼承人之債務,僅以所得遺產為限,負有限責任.
4.為保護弱勢繼承人,避免因無法知悉其得繼承,及被繼承人生前之債務等,分別於2008年及2009年六月修法時,於繼承編施行法增訂第1條之1,第1條之2,第1條之3等為例外之溯及既往之規定.惟對於修正施行前已償還之債務,基於法之安定性及信賴保護原則,明訂不得請求返還.再者,為加強保護舊法時之繼承人,2013年1月30日修正公布繼承編施行法第1條之1及第1條之2,將先前由繼承人就由其繼續償還債務,顯失公平之舉証責任,改為原則上以所得遺產為限,負清償責任;但債權人如能証明由繼承人負清償之有限責任,顯失公平者,繼承人仍須負無限責任.
5.本課程一方面介紹民法親屬與繼承相關概念之連結,如收養與其特別法,監護及輔助宣告制度與繼承法之基本概念與基礎理論;另一方面配合相關實務案例為適用及研析,以利概念了解及比較.盼引發同學學習興趣,進而發展學習方式,以期培養發現問題,獨立思考,與尋求正確資訊及解決問題之能力.
1. This course first introduces the following aspects of the inheritance and its special laws, the rights of inheritance such as marriage and children born in marriage and children born out of wedlock, the system of supervision and assistance declaration and the ability of the persons to be supervised and assisted, and the relevant legal issues. Secondly, the inheritance, the law of inheritance and implementation, and the relevant special laws, such as the Protection Law, the People's Relations Rules of Taiwan and Mainland Regions, the Public Sacrifice Law, the Public Certification Law and The Family Incident Law provides a cooperative explanation of relevant regulations; and introduces relevant foreign legislation, such as 771/728/712/668/437, etc., as well as practical explanations. Finally, this course will provide instructions on the inheritance rights, inheritance, and the inheritance's limited liability/declaration of inheritance/statutory unit pure acceptance, reliance, reliance and special points.
2. The inheritance of the law is based on the regulations on the rights and interests of the property generated by the inheritance. The purpose and spirit of the legislation shall, on the one hand, ensure the inheritor's right to survive, personality, equality, property rights, and on the other hand, also take into account the property rights and social transaction security of the debtor.
3. The Civil Law of our country enacted in 1931 is of course based on the principle of inheritance. If the inheritor fails to limit or concession within the legal period, he shall in principle bear all rights and obligations in the property of the inheritor, but shall be subject to the scope of inheritance of the rights and obligations of the inheritors not subject to inheritance. Since its enactment and implementation in 1931, the law has been revised several times, mainly in June 2008 and June 2009. Amendment, the amendment in June 2009 will originally take the principle of general inheritance as the principle, limit the inheritance system of inheritance and abandonment of exceptions, and amend the principle of limited liability of the inheritance and abandonment of inheritance as exception. In other words, in addition to abandoning inheritance, the inheritor summarizes the inheritance of all rights and obligations in the property of the inheritor, but for the debts of the inheritance, the inheritor is limited only by the inheritance of the inheritance and is responsible for limited liability.
4. In order to protect the weak inheritor and avoid the debts before his death because he was unable to know his inheritance and the debts before his death, the law was revised in June 2008 and June 2009, the provisions of the inheritance and implementation of the law were added to the previous provisions of the exceptions. However, for debts that had been reimbursed before the amendment, based on the stability and trust protection principles of the law, it is expressly prohibited to request a return. . Furthermore, in order to strengthen the inheritor when protecting the old law, on January 30, 2013, the inheritance and implementation law was amended and promulgated on Article 1 of Article 1 and Article 1 of the Inheritance and Implementation Law, the inheritor shall still be liable for unfair responsibility for the inheritor to continue to reimburse the debt and be liable for unfairness. However, if the debtor can find that the inheritor is responsible for the limited liability for the reimbursement and unfairness, the inheritor shall still be liable for unlimited responsibility.
5. On the one hand, this course introduces the link between the ownership of civil law and the inheritance of related concepts, such as the collection and its special law, the supervision and assistance declaration system, the basic concepts and basic theories of the inheritance of law; on the other hand, it is suitable and analyzed in conjunction with relevant practical cases to facilitate the understanding and comparison of concepts. We hope to attract students' interest in learning and develop learning methods, in order to cultivate the ability to discover problems, think independently, and seek correct information and solve problems.
某人死亡時，其一切的權利義務，須於一定秩序外，有人為之受；而其生前所扶養的親屬或家屬，為維持生活，乃須依賴遺產。本課程即在研討繼承關係及遺產繼承等諸問題，民法繼承之規定。
When a person dies, all his rights and interests must be taken by someone outside of a certain order; and the dependents or family members he supported during his lifetime must be borne by their own family in order to maintain their lives. This course discusses the issues of inheritance and inheritance, and the provisions of the Civil Law inheritance.
1. 陳棋炎 黃宗樂 郭振恭著, 民法親屬新論, 修訂十五版, 三民書局, 2020年8月
2. 陳棋炎 黃宗樂 郭振恭著, 民法繼承新論, 修訂十一版, 三民書局, 2019年10月
3. 全國法規資料庫, http:// law.moj.gov.tw
4. 司法院, http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw
5. 立法院全球法律資訊網, http://glin.ly.gov.tw/web/index.do
6. 聯合國, http://www.unhchr.ch
7.Liang-yu Chien, Gender Equality and the Development of Domestic Relations in Taiwan, 戴東雄教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集, 元照, 2007年 8月, 375-406頁.
8.簡良育,民法親屬編修正後子女稱姓之探討,月旦法學, 一六一期,2008年10月, 12-32頁.
9.簡良育, 永結同心金玉盟-結婚自由與真意之探討,公證法學, 第五期, 2008年12月, 2-28頁.
10.簡良育,美國親子關係法制之發展,2009年當前法律問題學術研討會, 中原大學法學院,2009年6月5日,35-48頁.
11.簡良育,離婚法制沿革及國際發展趨勢之研究,月旦法學, 一七五期,2009年12月,182-202頁.
12.簡良育,子女扶養父母法制之探討,溫豐文教授六秩五華誕祝壽論文集,民事法學的現代課題與展望,元照,2011年3月,263-298頁.
13.簡良育,美國親子關係法制發展之研究,月旦法學,一九一期, 2011年4月,64-82頁.
14.簡良育,醫療養護,個人人格尊嚴, 家庭親屬關係-以受成人監護或輔助宣告者的最佳利益研究為中心(一),2013社會變遷與醫療法制發展國際學術研討會, 2013年5月11日, 11-27頁.
15.簡良育,醫療養護,個人人格尊嚴, 家庭親屬關係-以受成人監護或輔助宣告者的最佳利益研究為中心(二),2014社會變遷與醫療法制發展國際學術研討會, 2014年5月17日, 51-76頁.
16.醫療養護、個人人格尊嚴、家庭親屬關係--以受成人監護或輔助宣告者的最佳利益研究為中心（三）, 2015社會變遷與醫療法治發展國際學術研討會,2015/06/05-2015/06/06, 37-70頁.
17.簡良育,醫療養護,個人人格尊嚴, 家庭親屬關係-以受成人監護或輔助宣告者的最佳利益研究為中心,東海大學法學叢刊(8),東海大學法律學院, 2014年 11月, 117-164頁.
18.簡良育,臺灣成人監護或輔助宣告法制發展之研究,The Development of Laws of Adult Declared of Guardianship or Assistantship in Taiwan,社會變遷下醫療法制之中心（三),東海大學法學叢刊(8),東海大學法律學院, 2015年 11月, 89-125頁.
19.簡良育,身分關係的習慣與法律發展之初探,月旦法學,二四八期, 2016年1月,85-106頁.
20.簡良育,離婚法制研革及國際發展趨勢之研究,元照匯豐專題-離婚專題研究,2016年07月,51-91頁.
21.簡良育,老年權益國際發展之研究(上)- 兼論臺灣之挑戰與相關法制的建議月旦法學,二七一期,2017年12月,101-125頁.
22.簡良育,老年權益國際發展之研究(下)- 兼論臺灣之挑戰與相關法制的建議月旦法學,二七二期,2018年1月,92-113頁.
1. Chen Qiyan, Huang Zongle, written by Guo Zhengong, New Discussion on Civil Law, Revised 15th Edition, Sanmin Book Bureau, August 2020
2. Chen Qiyan, Huang Zongle, written by Guo Zhengong, Civil Law inherits new discussion, revised eleventh edition, Sanmin Book Bureau, October 2019
3. National legal database, http:// law.moj.gov.tw
4. Judicial Court, http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw
5. Legislative Yuan Global Legal Information Network, http://glin.ly.gov.tw/web/index.do
6. United Nations, http://www.unhchr.ch
7. Liang-yu Chien, Gender Equality and the Development of Domestic Relations in Taiwan, Professor Dai Dongxiong's collection of essays on the seventh rank of Hua Zhuan, Yuan Zhao, August 2007, pages 375-406.
8. Strong education, an exploration of children’s surnames after the correction of civil law, Yuedan Law, Issue 161, October 2008, pages 12-32.
9. Simplified education, Eternal Heart Golden and Jade Alliance-Adventure of Marriage Freedom and True Idea, Public Law, Issue 5, December 2008, Pages 2-28.
10. Simplified education, development of legal system for American family relations, Current Legal Objection Academic Seminar in 2009, Central China University Law School, June 5, 2009, pages 35-48.
11. Research on the evolution of divorce legal system and international development trends, Yuedan Law, Issue 175, December 2009, pages 182-202.
12. Strong education, an exploration of the legal system of children supporting parents, Professor Wen Fengwen’s Six Orders and Five Hua’s Writings, Modern Courses and Prospects of Civil Law, Yuan Zhao, March 2011, pages 263-298.
13. Simplified education, research on the development of legal system in the United States, Yuedan Law, Issue 191, April 2011, pages 64-82.
14. Simplified education, medical care, personal respect, family relationships - centered on the best interests of those who are declared by adult supervision or assistance (I), International Academic Seminar on Social Change and Medical Law Development, May 11, 2013, pages 11-27.
15. Simplified education, medical care, personal respect, family relationships - centered on the best interests of those who are declared by adult supervision or assistance (II), International Academic Seminar on Social Change and Medical Law System Development, May 17, 2014, pages 51-76.
16. Medical care, personal respect, family relationships--centered research on the best interests of those who are declared by adult supervision or assistance (III), International Academic Seminar on Social Change and Medical Rule of Law Development, 2015/06/05-2015/06/06, pages 37-70.
17. Simplified education, medical care, personal respect, family relationships - centered on the best interests of those who are declared by adult supervision or assistance, Journal of Law of Donghai University (8), School of Law of Donghai University, November 2014, pages 117-164.
18. Simplified education, research on the development of the legal system in Taiwan, The Development of Laws of Adult Declared of Guardianship or Assistantship in Taiwan, Center for Medical Legal System under Social Change (III), Journal of Law of Donghai University (8), School of Law of Donghai University, November 2015, pages 89-125.
19. Preliminary study on the development of simplified education, identity relationships and legal development, Yuedan Law, Issue 248, January 2016, pages 85-106.
20. Research on the research and development of divorce legal system and international development trends, Yuanzhao Reflection and Research on Divorce Topic-Divorce Topic, July 2016, pages 51-91.
21. Research on the International Development of Simplified Education and the Elderly Rights (Part 1) - A Proposal on Taiwan’s Challenges and Related Legal System Yuedan Law, 271, December 2017, Pages 101-125.
22. Research on the International Development of Simplified Education and the Elderly Rights (Part 2) - A discussion on Taiwan’s Challenges and Related Legal Systems Yuedan Law, No. 272, January 2018, pages 92-113.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平時成績平時成績 Regular achievements |
33 | 出缺席狀況.隨堂測驗或練習,自我能力提升之努力及進步 |
| 期中考試期中考試 Midterm exam |
33 | 以基本概念釐清並配合案例練習為重心(例如選擇或簡答與申論題) |
| 學期考試學期考試 Period exam |
34 | 以基本概念釐清並配合案例練習為重心(例如選擇或簡答與申論題) |
