我國刑訴法總則篇第12章證據章中，首先揭示「無罪推定」及「證據裁判主義」，第154條第1項規定：「被告未經審判證明有罪確定前，推定其為無罪。」同條第2項規定：「犯罪事實應依證據認定之，無證據不得認定犯罪事實。」再者，基於無罪推定的原理，第161條第1項規定：「檢察官就被告犯罪事實，應負舉證責任，並指出證明之方法。」明文規範檢察官舉證責任之內涵，除證據之提出外，另應就被告犯罪事實指明其證明方法，以說服法官，藉此督促檢察官善盡實行公訴之職責。
其次，關於如何依據證據來認定犯罪事實，有關證明活動的實施，第155條第2項規定應採取嚴格證明，「無證據能力，未經合法調查之證據，不得作為判斷之依據。」至於，有證據能力之證據經合法調查後，其證據價值之判斷，第155條第1項規定：「證據之證明力，由法院本於確信自由判斷。但不得違背經驗法則及論理法則」，揚棄過去由法律明定證據證明力之「證據法定主義」。精簡的三個條文五項規定，架構了支配刑事審判證據法則的體系。
本學期以刑事證據法則作為專題研究課題，針對證據能力、調查程序、證明程度及舉證責任等相關子題，比較檢討我國與英美法證據法則之異同，期使同學對於刑事證據法能有體系及深入的理解。In the evidence chapter of Chapter 12 of the General Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law of our country, the "presumption of innocence" and the "evidence-based adjudication doctrine" are first revealed. Article 154, item 1, stipulates: "The defendant is presumed innocent until his guilt is proven through trial." Same. Paragraph 2 of Article 161 stipulates: "The facts of a crime shall be determined based on the evidence, and the facts of a crime shall not be determined without evidence." Furthermore, based on the principle of presumption of innocence, Paragraph 1 of Article 161 stipulates: "The prosecutor shall be responsible for the defendant's criminal facts. "The burden of proof and the method of proof shall be clearly specified. In addition to the presentation of evidence, the method of proof of the defendant's criminal facts shall also be specified in order to convince the judge and thereby urge the prosecutor to carry out the public prosecution to the best of his ability." Responsibilities.
Secondly, regarding how to determine criminal facts based on evidence and the implementation of proof activities, Article 155 Paragraph 2 stipulates that strict proof should be adopted. "Evidence without evidential capacity and without legal investigation shall not be used as the basis for judgment." As for, Article 155 Paragraph 1 of Article 155 Paragraph 1 stipulates that "the probative power of evidence shall be judged freely by the court based on its conviction. However, it shall not violate the rules of experience and the rules of reasoning." The "evidence legal doctrine" in which the probative force of evidence is clearly determined by law. The streamlined three articles and five provisions have structured the system that governs the evidence rules in criminal trials.
This semester takes criminal evidence law as a special research topic. Focusing on relevant sub-topics such as evidentiary ability, investigation procedures, degree of proof and burden of proof, we will comparatively review the similarities and differences between our country’s and British and American law’s evidence laws, hoping to enable students to have a systematic and systematic understanding of criminal evidence law. Deep understanding.
授課教師參考著作
附錄：參考期刊論文(作者：陳運財)
一、 關於國民參與刑事審判
2004年6月，論日本刑事司法制度之改革，私立東海大學法學研究第20期，第113—151頁。
2010年5月，國民參與刑事審判之研究—兼評日本裁判員制度，月旦法學雜誌第180期，第131-149頁。
2013年4月，論國民參與刑事審判與上訴制度之變革，月旦法學雜誌第215期，第167-185頁。
二、 關於檢察權與刑事程序
2004年5月，檢警關係定位問題之研究，月旦法學第108期，第64-77頁。
2007年1月，論檢察總長的產生方式與特偵組法制化—由日本檢察制度之觀點，檢察新論，第85-99頁。
2009年1月，我國特別偵查組之現況與未來，檢察新論，第5期，第20-22頁（與談意見）。
2005年9月，檢察獨立與檢察一體之分際，月旦法學第124期，第5-22頁。
2000年1月，如何提昇檢察功能—兼評法務部檢察改革白皮書--民間司法改革研討會，第133—148頁，皇冠出版。
2008年5月，檢察改革與刑事訴訟法，收錄於『檢察制度世紀回顧紀念文集』乙書，第158-171頁。
2000年5月，檢察官之起訴裁量，台灣本土法學雜誌第10期，第132—141頁。
2002年6月，緩起訴制度之研究，台灣本土法學雜誌第35期，第73-97頁。
2002年9月，起訴審查制度之研究，月旦法學第88期，第26-50頁。
2000年7月，論起訴事實之同一性，月旦法學第62期，第145-158頁。
1999年6月，論起訴法條之變更與被告防禦權之保障，台灣本土法學雜誌第2期，第88—97頁。
三、關於辯護權實質保障之課題
2004年10月，被告接受辯護人援助之機會，月旦法學教室第24期，第115-120頁。
2006年10月，刑事訴訟之修正與刑事辨護，月旦法學雜誌第137期，第120-132頁。
2011年05月，釋字第六五四號解釋與自由溝通權，月旦法學雜誌第192期，第5-20頁。
2009年09月，論偵查不公開之適用範圍及其例外，全國律師，第13卷第9期，第25-39頁。
四、關於證據法則的再檢討
2000年12月，論刑事訴訟證據法則之修正，律師雜誌255期，第23-46頁。
2004年10月，刑事程序鑑定之證據法則，萬國法律第137期，第32-44頁。
2003年6月，刑事程序中DNA鑑定之研究，成大法學第五期，第85-119頁。
2003年6月，傳聞法則之理論及其實踐，月旦法學第97期，第85-106頁。
2007年5月，傳聞法則及其例外之實務運作問題檢討，台灣法學雜誌第94期，第128-153頁。
2003年7月，共同被告之調查，律師雜誌，第286期，頁97－135。
2006年9月，被害人之訊問與具結，月旦法學教室第47期，第22-23頁。
2006年11月，證人未經具結之檢訊筆錄之效力，月旦法學教室第49期，第20-21頁。
2007年4月，偵查中證人之具結與傳聞例外之適用－評九四年台上字三二七七號刑事判決－，台灣法學雜誌第93期，第238-258頁。
2010年6月，共同被告於檢察官偵查訊問時所為之陳述之證據能力，台灣法學雜誌第153期，第217-222頁。
2012年11月，第159條之1第2項檢訊筆錄實務爭議問題檢討，刑事法學現代化動向—黃東熊教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集，第131-159頁。
2007年9月，評大法官解釋582號暨592號解釋，收錄於『最高法院裁判與法學理論之實踐』乙書，第651-698頁。
2003年6月，刑事訴訟之舉證責任與推定，收錄於『刑事證據法則之新發
展』黃東熊教授七秩祝壽論文集一書，第437-494頁。
2008年11月，證據能力有無之舉證問題研究，收錄於『刑與思─林山田教授紀念論文集』乙書，第461-491頁。
2008年12月，論檢察官舉證責任與法院職權調查之界限--以最高法院92台上128號刑事判例為中心，收錄於『刑事證據法--最高法院學術研究叢書(16)』，第295-328頁。
2015年07月，法庭遠距視訊調查與對質詰問權之保障，檢察新論，18,頁77-107。
2016年04月，GPS監控位置資訊的法定程序。台灣法學雜誌，第293期，第59-74頁。
五、關於刑事救濟程序
1999年5月，論刑事訴訟上訴制度之重構，全國律師第3卷第5期，第28—37頁。
2001年10月，我國刑事訴訟上訴審構造之檢討，收錄於『刑事訴訟起訴狀一本主義及配套措施』（下）一書，最高法院學術研究會出版，第495—528頁。
2007年4月，刑事訴訟第三審構造之探討，月旦法學雜誌第143期，
Reference works by instructors
Appendix: Reference journal articles (Author: Chen Yuncai)
1. Regarding citizens’ participation in criminal trials
June 2004, On the Reform of Japan's Criminal Justice System, Private Tokai University Law Research Issue 20, pp. 113-151.
May 2010, Research on National Participation in Criminal Trials—Comments on the Japanese Referee System, Yuedan Law Journal, Issue 180, pp. 131-149.
April 2013, on citizens’ participation in criminal trials and the reform of the appeal system, Yuedan Law Journal, Issue 215, pp. 167-185.
2. About prosecutorial power and criminal procedure
May 2004, Research on the Positioning of Prosecution-Police Relations, Yuedan Law Issue 108, pp. 64-77.
January 2007, On the creation method of the Prosecutor General and the legalization of the Special Investigation Team - from the perspective of the Japanese prosecutorial system, New Review of Prosecutorial Affairs, pp. 85-99.
January 2009, The Current Situation and Future of my country’s Special Investigation Teams, Procuratorial Review, Issue 5, pp. 20-22 (opinions from the interview).
September 2005, the separation between procuratorial independence and procuratorial integration, Yuedan Law Journal, Issue 124, pp. 5-22.
January 2000, How to Improve the Procuratorial Function—Comments on the Ministry of Justice’s Procuratorial Reform White Paper—Private Judicial Reform Seminar, pp. 133-148, Crown Publishing.
In May 2008, Procuratorial Reform and Criminal Procedure Law were included in Book B of "Commemorative Collection of Century Review of Procuratorial System", pages 158-171.
May 2000, Prosecutor’s Prosecution Discretion, Taiwan Local Law Journal, Issue 10, pp. 132-141.
June 2002, Research on the Deferred Prosecution System, Taiwan Local Law Journal, Issue 35, pp. 73-97.
September 2002, Research on the Prosecution Review System, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 88, pp. 26-50.
July 2000, On the Identity of Prosecution Facts, Yuedan Law Issue 62, pp. 145-158.
June 1999, on the changes to the Prosecution Law and the protection of the defendant’s right of defense, Taiwan Local Law Journal, Issue 2, pp. 88-97.
3. Issues concerning the substantive protection of the right to defense
October 2004, the opportunity for the defendant to receive assistance from the defender, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 24, pp. 115-120.
October 2006, Criminal Procedure Amendment and Criminal Defense, Yuedan Law Journal, Issue 137, pp. 120-132.
May 2011, Interpretation No. 654: Right to Interpretation and Free Communication, Yuedan Law Journal, Issue 192, pp. 5-20.
September 2009, On the Scope of Application and Exceptions of Non-Disclosure in Investigations, National Lawyers, Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 25-39.
4. Re-examination of the rules of evidence
December 2000, On the Amendment to the Laws of Evidence in Criminal Procedure, Lawyers Magazine, Issue 255, pp. 23-46.
October 2004, Evidence Rules for Criminal Procedure Identification, Law of All Nations Issue 137, pp. 32-44.
June 2003, Research on DNA Identification in Criminal Procedure, National Cheng Kung University Law Journal Issue 5, pp. 85-119.
June 2003, The Theory and Practice of the Hearsay Law, Yuedan Law Issue 97, pp. 85-106.
May 2007, Review of Practical Operation Issues of the Hearsay Rule and its Exceptions, Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 94, pp. 128-153.
July 2003, Investigation of co-defendants, Lawyers Magazine, Issue 286, pp. 97-135.
September 2006, Victim’s Interrogation and Confirmation, Yuedan Law Classroom Issue 47, pp. 22-23.
November 2006, The validity of interrogation transcripts where witnesses have not committed themselves, Yuedan Law Classroom, Issue 49, pp. 20-21.
April 2007, Witnesses’ Recognition in Investigations and the Application of the Hearsay Exception - Comment on Taiwan Criminal Judgment No. 3277 of 1994 - Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 93, pp. 238-258.
June 2010, The evidentiary ability of the co-defendants’ statements during the prosecutor’s investigation and interrogation, Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 153, pp. 217-222.
November 2012, Review of Practical Controversial Issues in Article 159-1 Item 2 of Prosecution Transcripts, Trends in Modernization of Criminal Law—Professor Huang Dongxiong’s Birthday Celebration Essays, pp. 131-159.
In September 2007, Commentary on Justice Interpretation No. 582 and Interpretation No. 592 were included in Book B of "Supreme Court Judgments and the Practice of Legal Theory", pages 651-698.
In June 2003, the burden of proof and presumptions in criminal proceedings were included in "New Releases of Criminal Evidence Laws
"Zhan" Collection of Essays on the Seventh Rank Birthday Celebration of Professor Huang Dongxiong, pp. 437-494.
In November 2008, a study on the evidentiary issue of whether or not there is evidentiary capacity was included in Book B of "Crime and Thoughts - Memorial Essays of Professor Lin Shantian", pages 461-491.
In December 2008, on the boundary between the prosecutor's burden of proof and the court's authority to investigate - focusing on the Criminal Case No. 128 on Taiwan 92 of the Supreme Court, included in "Criminal Evidence Law - Supreme Court Academic Research Series (16)", No. Pages 295-328.
July 2015, Remote video investigation in court and protection of cross-examination rights, Procuratorial Review, 18, pp. 77-107.
April 2016, legal procedures for GPS monitoring of location information. Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 293, Pages 59-74.
5. About criminal relief procedures
May 1999, On the Reconstruction of the Criminal Procedure Appeal System, National Lawyers, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp. 28-37.
In October 2001, a review of my country's criminal litigation appellate trial organization was included in the book "The Doctrine of Single Complaint and Supporting Measures in Criminal Procedure" (Part 2), published by the Supreme Court Academic Research Association, pp. 495-528.
April 2007, Discussion on the structure of the third instance of criminal proceedings, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 143,
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂報告與參與討論課堂報告與參與討論 Class reports and discussions |
50 | |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
50 |
