我國刑訴法總則篇第12章證據章中，首先揭示「無罪推定」及「證據裁判主義」，第154條第1項規定：「被告未經審判證明有罪確定前，推定其為無罪。」同條第2項規定：「犯罪事實應依證據認定之，無證據不得認定犯罪事實。」再者，基於無罪推定的原理，第161條第1項規定：「檢察官就被告犯罪事實，應負舉證責任，並指出證明之方法。」明文規範檢察官舉證責任之內涵，除證據之提出外，另應就被告犯罪事實指明其證明方法，以說服法官，藉此督促檢察官善盡實行公訴之職責。
其次，關於如何依據證據來認定犯罪事實，有關證明活動的實施，第155條第2項規定應採取嚴格證明，「無證據能力，未經合法調查之證據，不得作為判斷之依據。」至於，有證據能力之證據經合法調查後，其證據價值之判斷，第155條第1項規定：「證據之證明力，由法院本於確信自由判斷。但不得違背經驗法則及論理法則」，揚棄過去由法律明定證據證明力之「證據法定主義」。精簡的三個條文五項規定，架構了支配刑事審判證據法則的體系。
本學期以刑事證據法則作為專題研究課題，針對證據能力、調查程序、證明程度及舉證責任等相關子題，比較檢討我國與英美法證據法則之異同，期使同學對於刑事證據法能有體系及深入的理解。In the Certification Chapter 12 of the General Chapter of the Criminal Law, the first thing to reveal is the "presumption of no crime" and "certification of judgement". Article 154, Article 1 stipulates: "The defendant is presumed to be innocent before he is confirmed by the judgment of the guilt." Article 2 of the same Article: "The crime shall be determined by the evidence, and the crime shall not be determined without evidence." Furthermore, based on The principle of presumption of crime, Article 161, Article 1 stipulates: "The prosecutor shall be responsible for the defendant's criminal act and point out the method of proof." The explicit provision of the prosecutor's criminal act shall be specified in the connotation of the prosecutor's criminal act, in addition to the prosecutor's criminal act, in order to convince the judge, and urge the prosecutor to perform the duties of public prosecutors.
Secondly, regarding how to determine the crime based on the evidence, and regarding the implementation of the certification activity, Article 155, Article 2 shall adopt a strict certificate, "No proof of ability, and without legal investigation, shall not be used as a basis for judgment." As for, a proof of ability, After a legal investigation, the judgment of the value of the proof is stipulated in Article 155, Article 1: "The evidence of the proof of the proof shall be determined by the court to confirm the free judgment. However, the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the The three simple articles and five regulations constitute the system that governs the laws on criminal trials.
During this period, criminal certification laws were used as a special research course, and compared the relevant sub-items such as certification ability, investigation procedures, certification degree and certification responsibility, and compared the differences between my country and the United States' legal laws, so that students can have a systematic and in-depth understanding of criminal certification laws.
授課教師參考著作
附錄：參考期刊論文(作者：陳運財)
一、 關於國民參與刑事審判
2004年6月，論日本刑事司法制度之改革，私立東海大學法學研究第20期，第113—151頁。
2010年5月，國民參與刑事審判之研究—兼評日本裁判員制度，月旦法學雜誌第180期，第131-149頁。
2013年4月，論國民參與刑事審判與上訴制度之變革，月旦法學雜誌第215期，第167-185頁。
二、 關於檢察權與刑事程序
2004年5月，檢警關係定位問題之研究，月旦法學第108期，第64-77頁。
2007年1月，論檢察總長的產生方式與特偵組法制化—由日本檢察制度之觀點，檢察新論，第85-99頁。
2009年1月，我國特別偵查組之現況與未來，檢察新論，第5期，第20-22頁（與談意見）。
2005年9月，檢察獨立與檢察一體之分際，月旦法學第124期，第5-22頁。
2000年1月，如何提昇檢察功能—兼評法務部檢察改革白皮書--民間司法改革研討會，第133—148頁，皇冠出版。
2008年5月，檢察改革與刑事訴訟法，收錄於『檢察制度世紀回顧紀念文集』乙書，第158-171頁。
2000年5月，檢察官之起訴裁量，台灣本土法學雜誌第10期，第132—141頁。
2002年6月，緩起訴制度之研究，台灣本土法學雜誌第35期，第73-97頁。
2002年9月，起訴審查制度之研究，月旦法學第88期，第26-50頁。
2000年7月，論起訴事實之同一性，月旦法學第62期，第145-158頁。
1999年6月，論起訴法條之變更與被告防禦權之保障，台灣本土法學雜誌第2期，第88—97頁。
三、關於辯護權實質保障之課題
2004年10月，被告接受辯護人援助之機會，月旦法學教室第24期，第115-120頁。
2006年10月，刑事訴訟之修正與刑事辨護，月旦法學雜誌第137期，第120-132頁。
2011年05月，釋字第六五四號解釋與自由溝通權，月旦法學雜誌第192期，第5-20頁。
2009年09月，論偵查不公開之適用範圍及其例外，全國律師，第13卷第9期，第25-39頁。
四、關於證據法則的再檢討
2000年12月，論刑事訴訟證據法則之修正，律師雜誌255期，第23-46頁。
2004年10月，刑事程序鑑定之證據法則，萬國法律第137期，第32-44頁。
2003年6月，刑事程序中DNA鑑定之研究，成大法學第五期，第85-119頁。
2003年6月，傳聞法則之理論及其實踐，月旦法學第97期，第85-106頁。
2007年5月，傳聞法則及其例外之實務運作問題檢討，台灣法學雜誌第94期，第128-153頁。
2003年7月，共同被告之調查，律師雜誌，第286期，頁97－135。
2006年9月，被害人之訊問與具結，月旦法學教室第47期，第22-23頁。
2006年11月，證人未經具結之檢訊筆錄之效力，月旦法學教室第49期，第20-21頁。
2007年4月，偵查中證人之具結與傳聞例外之適用－評九四年台上字三二七七號刑事判決－，台灣法學雜誌第93期，第238-258頁。
2010年6月，共同被告於檢察官偵查訊問時所為之陳述之證據能力，台灣法學雜誌第153期，第217-222頁。
2012年11月，第159條之1第2項檢訊筆錄實務爭議問題檢討，刑事法學現代化動向—黃東熊教授八秩華誕祝壽論文集，第131-159頁。
2007年9月，評大法官解釋582號暨592號解釋，收錄於『最高法院裁判與法學理論之實踐』乙書，第651-698頁。
2003年6月，刑事訴訟之舉證責任與推定，收錄於『刑事證據法則之新發
展』黃東熊教授七秩祝壽論文集一書，第437-494頁。
2008年11月，證據能力有無之舉證問題研究，收錄於『刑與思─林山田教授紀念論文集』乙書，第461-491頁。
2008年12月，論檢察官舉證責任與法院職權調查之界限--以最高法院92台上128號刑事判例為中心，收錄於『刑事證據法--最高法院學術研究叢書(16)』，第295-328頁。
2015年07月，法庭遠距視訊調查與對質詰問權之保障，檢察新論，18,頁77-107。
2016年04月，GPS監控位置資訊的法定程序。台灣法學雜誌，第293期，第59-74頁。
五、關於刑事救濟程序
1999年5月，論刑事訴訟上訴制度之重構，全國律師第3卷第5期，第28—37頁。
2001年10月，我國刑事訴訟上訴審構造之檢討，收錄於『刑事訴訟起訴狀一本主義及配套措施』（下）一書，最高法院學術研究會出版，第495—528頁。
2007年4月，刑事訴訟第三審構造之探討，月旦法學雜誌第143期，
References by teachers
Attachment: Reference journal articles (author: Chen Haojian)
1. Regarding the participation of citizens and criminal trials
In June 2004, on the reform of Japan's criminal justice system, Private Donghai University Law Research No. 20, Pages 113-151.
In May 2010, the National People's Political Consultative Conference and Criminal Trials - and Review of the Japanese Judgment System, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 180, Pages 131-149.
In April 2013, discussing the changes in the civil participation and criminal trial and appeal system, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 215, pages 167-185.
2. Regarding prosecutorial rights and criminal procedures
In May 2004, Research on the Positioning Problems of Police Inspection, Yuedan Law No. 108, Pages 64-77.
In January 2007, the Chief of Inspection’s generation method and legalization of special-detection groups—the viewpoint of the Japanese inspection system, inspection of the new discussion, pages 85-99.
In January 2009, the current situation and future of our special investigation group were investigated, No. 5, Pages 20-22 (conversation with opinions).
In September 2005, the distinction between inspection independence and inspection, Yuedan Law No. 124, pages 5-22.
In January 2000, How to improve the inspection function - and also evaluate the White Paper on the Inspection Reform of the Ministry of Legal Affairs-Study on the Civil Judicial Reform, pages 133-148, Crown Publishing.
In May 2008, the Criminal Reform and Criminal Disclaimer Law was included in the Book B of the "Collection of Century Reflections on the Inspection System", pages 158-171.
In May 2000, the prosecutor's discretion came to an end, Taiwan Local Law Journal Issue 10, Pages 132-141.
In June 2002, Research on the Cause of the Dispute System, Taiwan Local Law Journal Issue 35, Pages 73-97.
In September 2002, the study of the complaint review system was initiated, Yuedan Law No. 88, pages 26-50.
In July 2000, discussing the identity of the argument, Yuedan Law No. 62, pages 145-158.
In June 1999, discussing the changes in the law and the protection of the defendant's defense rights, Taiwan Local Law Journal Issue 2, pages 88-97.
III. Course on the quality of guarantee of protection of rights
In October 2004, the defendant received the opportunity to provide a caregiver, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 24, pages 115-120.
In October 2006, the amendment and criminal identification of criminal complaints, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 137, pages 120-132.
In May 2011, the 654th chapter of the word "后" explains the right to communicate with free communication, Yuedan Law Magazine No. 192, pages 5-20.
In September 2009, the scope of application of unfair investigations and their exceptions, National Lawyers, Vol. 13, Issue 9, Pages 25-39.
4. Re-examination of certification laws
In December 2000, discussing the amendment of the Criminal Certification Law, Lawyer Magazine No. 255, Pages 23-46.
In October 2004, Certification Law for Criminal Procedures, No. 137, Pages 32-44.
In June 2003, the study of DNA predication in criminal procedures, Chengda Law, Issue 5, Pages 85-119.
June 2003, the theory and its practical theory of the law, Yuedan Law No. 97, pages 85-106.
In May 2007, the review of practical operation problems of communication laws and their exceptions, Taiwan Law Journal Issue 94, pages 128-153.
In July 2003, the investigation of the co-defendant, lawyer magazine, No. 286, pages 97-135.
In September 2006, the victim's information and conclusions, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 47, pages 22-23.
In November 2006, the witness did not have the effect of the final checklist, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 49, pages 20-21.
In April 2007, the investigation into the application of the evidence and the exception of the news - Review of the criminal judgment of the 1994 Taiwanese 3277--Taiwan Law Journal Issue 93, Pages 238-258.
In June 2010, the co-defendant's certification ability was reported by the prosecutor when he interrogated the inquiry, Taiwan Law Journal Issue 153, pages 217-222.
In November 2012, Article 159, 1, 2, review of the practical disputes, modernization trend of criminal law - Professor Huang Dongxiong's Eight-ranking Hua Congratulations, pages 131-159.
In September 2007, the Supreme Court explained No. 582 and No. 592, and was included in Book B, "Realization of Supreme Court Judgments and Jurisprudence", pages 651-698.
In June 2003, the proof responsibility and presumption of criminal complaints were included in the "New Issuance of Criminal Certification Law
Exhibition』Professor Huang Dongxiong's Collection of Essays on the Seventh Order of the Praise, Pages 437-494.
In November 2008, the study of certifying problems with proof ability was included in "Criminal and Thought-Professor Lin Yamada's Collection of Remarks", pages 461-491.
In December 2008, the boundary between prosecutor's certification responsibility and court responsibilities investigation - centered on the Criminal Jurisdiction No. 128 on Station 92 of the Supreme Court, and was included in the "Criminal Certification Law-Supreme Court Academic Research Book (16)", pages 295-328.
In July 2015, the court inspected the New Review, 18, pages 77-107.
In April 2016, the legal procedures for GPS monitoring location information. Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 293, Pages 59-74.
5. About criminal economic relief procedures
In May 1999, discussing the importance of criminal lawsuit system, National Lawyers Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 28-37.
In October 2001, the review of the criminal complaint in my country was included in the book "One Idea and Supporting Measures for Criminal Trials" (Part 2), published by the Supreme Court Academic Research Association, pages 495-528.
In April 2007, the third investigation into the criminal complaint structure, Yuedan Law Magazine No. 143,
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂報告與參與討論課堂報告與參與討論 Class report and discussion |
50 | |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
50 |
