本課程擬以「修復式正義」或稱「修復式司法」(Restorative Justice)之「刑事司法轉向」新視角，以「被害人訴訟參與制度」為主軸，深入檢討新制對我國刑事訴訟法落實修復式正義之運作影響與未來展望，藉此厚植制度運用之學理基盤乃至於生成有益於將來立法論之多元觀點。並以此新制檢討為基礎，再進一步擴展，將檢討的觸角深入犯罪被害人與刑事司法之各個相關的重要議題。依據新制，特定犯罪被害人，得聲請參與訴訟(新制第455條之38，略記為455-38，以下同。)，經法院准許訴訟參與者(455-40)，得得隨時選任代理人(455-41)，於審判中有卷證資訊獲知(455-42)，在準備、審判期日則有受通知及在場權(455-43、455-44)，且可對證據調查以及量刑表示意見、並得就證據證明力辯論(455-46、455-47)。由此，不難發現，新制下，我國的被害人訴訟參與人，並非當事人，也並未享有如日本刑事訴訟法所定對檢察官權限行使之表示意見並聽取檢察官說明的權利(同法316-35)亦無詢問證人之權利(同法316-36)；而且，也與德國刑事訴訟法所定訴訟參加制度有所不同，亦即，在我國的情形，並沒有對證人及鑑定人提問之權利(同法240)，亦無證據調查聲請權（同法244Ⅲ〜Ⅵ），更無獨立救濟權（同法401Ⅰⅰ）。
如上對照以觀，我國新制，與德日相較，似乎顯得有點陽春，那麼，新制，在運作上，究竟能揮發如何效能？也就著實引人興趣了。為此，本課程以「被害人訴訟參與制度」為主軸，設定以下四項檢討課題。
第一課題、刑事程序構造論與被害人主體地位構造論。
第二課題、受律師協助之權利與被害人參與程序。
第三課題、轉向機制與系統性事故之被害人。
第四課題、其他重要議題。

This course intends to use the new perspective of "criminal justice transition" called "restorative justice" or "restorative justice", with the "victim litigation participation system" as the main axis, to conduct an in-depth review of the operational impact and future prospects of the new system on the implementation of restorative justice in my country's criminal procedure law, so as to solidify the academic foundation for the application of the system and even generate diverse perspectives that are beneficial to future legislative discussions. Based on this new system review, we will further expand the review's tentacles into various important issues related to crime victims and criminal justice. According to the new system, victims of specific crimes may apply to participate in the litigation (Article 455-38 of the new system, abbreviated as 455-38, the same below). With the permission of the court to participate in the litigation (455-40), they may choose an agent at any time (455-41). During the trial, there are The court has access to documentary information (455-42), has the right to be notified and present during preparation and trial dates (455-43, 455-44), and can express opinions on the investigation of evidence and sentencing, and can debate the probative strength of evidence (455-46, 455-47). From this, it is not difficult to find that under the new system, participants in victim litigation in our country are not parties, nor do they have the right to express opinions on the exercise of the prosecutor's authority and listen to the prosecutor's explanation as stipulated in the Japanese Criminal Procedure Law (Same Law 316-35), nor do they have the right to question witnesses (Same Law 316-36) ); Moreover, it is also different from the litigation participation system stipulated in the German Criminal Procedure Law. That is, in the case of our country, there is no right to question witnesses and appraisers (Same Law 240), there is no right to investigate and claim evidence (Same Law 244Ⅲ~Ⅵ), and there is no right to independent relief (Same Law 401Ⅰⅰ).
Based on the above comparison, our country's new system seems to be a bit sluggish compared to Germany and Japan. So, how effective can the new system be in operation? It's really interesting. To this end, this course takes "Victim Litigation Participation System" as the main axis and sets the following four review topics.
The first topic is the structural theory of criminal procedure and the structural theory of the victim's subject status.
The second topic is the right to receive assistance from lawyers and the victim’s participation in the procedure.
The third topic, steering mechanism and victims of systemic accidents.
The fourth issue, other important issues.

1. 劉芳伶自編教材以及指定參考文獻。
新版教學平台:https://fsis.thu.edu.tw/mosi/ccsd3/index.php?job=moodle&loginn=&r=
2. http://fjudkm.judicial.gov.tw/(司法智識庫)
3. http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/Index.htm(司法院法學資料檢索系統)
4. Lexis Advance 法學檢索系統
5. Westlaw International (Westlaw法律新聞全文資料庫)
6. 月旦法學文獻索引系統。

1. Liu Fanling’s self-edited textbooks and designated references.
New version of teaching platform: https://fsis.thu.edu.tw/mosi/ccsd3/index.php?job=moodle&loginn=&r=
2. http://fjudkm.judicial.gov.tw/(Judicial Knowledge Base)
3. http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/Index.htm (Judicial Yuan Legal Information Retrieval System)
4. Lexis Advance law search system
5. Westlaw International (Full-text database of Westlaw legal news)
6. Yuedan legal literature index system.