本課程目標為使學生研究西方20世紀展覽簡史發展、策展轉變和台灣案例(以台北市立美術館案例為深入探討對象)觀察與分析比較,兼及展覽製作之要訣,以獲致展覽研究和創作者的展覽實踐職涯發展的認知基礎。The purpose of this course is to enable students to study the historical development of Western 20th Century exhibitions, curatorial transformation and Taiwan cases (taking the case of Taipei City Art Museum as an in-depth discussion object), as well as the key to exhibition production, to establish the cognitive foundation for exhibition research and the development of exhibition careers by creators.
1.The Culture f Curating and the Curating of culures,Paul O'Neill著,2012,the MIT Press,Cambridge, MA。
2.台灣當代藝術策展二十年,呂佩怡主編,2015年4月,典藏藝術家庭,台北。
3.策展的轉變:從實踐到論述(The Curatorial Turn: From Practice to Discourse),歐尼爾(Paul O’Neill)著,王聖智譯,藝外雜誌(ARTITUDE),2013年4月號,第43期,頁54-69。
4.Gavin Wade編,《Curating in the 21st Century》,2000,The New Gallery Walsall/University of Wolverhampton。
5.Reesa Greenberg,Bruce W Ferguson,Sandy Nairne等編,《Thinking about Exhibition》,1996,Routledge。
6.近期策展專案資料:2019威尼斯雙年展台灣館
1.The Culture f Curating and the Curating of culures, by Paul O'Neill, 2012, the MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Taiwan’s contemporary art curator for twenty years, edited by Ji Peiyi, April 2015, Collection Art Family, Taipei.
3. The Curatorial Turn: From Practice to Discourse, by Paul O’Neill, ARTITUDE, April 2013, No. 43, Pages 54-69.
4.Editor Gavin Wade, "Curating in the 21st Century", 2000, The New Gallery Walsall/University of Wolverhampton.
5. Editors by Reesa Greenberg, Bruce W Ferguson, Sandy Nairne, etc., "Thinking about Exhibition", 1996, Routledge.
6. Recent curatorial project information: Taiwan Museum, 2019 Venice Double Year Booth
評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
---|---|---|
課堂參與、學習態度、及尊重團體共識課堂參與、學習態度、及尊重團體共識 Class participation, learning attitudes, and respecting the common sense of the group |
20 | |
作業的品質、進度、及完成度(不接受遲交)作業的品質、進度、及完成度(不接受遲交) Quality, progress, and completion of the work (no submissions are accepted) |
40 | |
課堂報告評析及討論的品質與參與程度課堂報告評析及討論的品質與參與程度 Quality and participation level of class report analysis and discussion |
40 |