本課程旨在探討憲政主義(Constitutionalism)與民主政治(Democracy)之間的競合關係。蓋民主政治主張多數統治，憲政主義（Constitutionalism）則強調保障少數，兩者在本質上是相互衝突的。因此，如何在民主政治多數統治的基礎上來保障少數，即成為憲政民主（Constitutional Democracy）的主要爭議。本課程旨在說明這些爭議的所在，並介紹憲政民主的不同形態，以期學生具備相關的政治知識，分析判斷與公共服務的能力。This course aims to explore the competitive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. Democracy advocates majority rule, while constitutionalism emphasizes protecting minorities. The two are essentially in conflict with each other. Therefore, how to protect minorities on the basis of majority rule in democratic politics has become a major controversy in constitutional democracy. This course aims to explain these controversies and introduce different forms of constitutional democracy, with the aim of equipping students with relevant political knowledge, analytical judgment and public service capabilities.
通識課程不同於專業課程，實乃著重引導學生主動關懷、探索與實踐人類的終極價值與智慧；同時通識課程所提供的知識，不是專業課程的淺薄化，而是具有厚實感的基礎知識。本校根據創校傳統、校訓與辦學理念訂定通識教育定四大基本素養：求真素養、篤信素養、力行素養與宏通素養，以具體落實本校通識教育之理想。希望本校學生能發揮自主學習精神，在通識課程老師的引導下，逐漸培養其通識教育基本素養，並期待能終身學習。各種基本素養並訂有具體的學習成效指標，以做教學與學習成效之自我檢證的具體指標，分述如下：求真素養（自然領域）：1.學習自然科學的方法或哲學以探索物理與生命世界的微妙，2.發揮就事論事的精神，3.能參與科學議題相關的公共事務。篤信素養（人文領域）：1.學習人文精神以探索內在自我與領會人類文明的深層價值，2.發展自律精神，3.能運用理性進行道德推理。力行素養（社會領域）：1.運用社會科學的方法或哲學以激發學生的傾聽與溝通能力，2.承認與尊重多元差，3.實踐民主審議的精神。宏通素養（跨領域）：1.追求人類的整體價值，2.融通求真、篤信、力行等素養於個人生命之中。各領域的課程對於學習成效指標可以跨選，不必拘泥。
General courses are different from professional courses. They actually focus on guiding students to actively care for, explore and practice the ultimate value and wisdom of mankind. At the same time, the knowledge provided by general courses is not the superficiality of professional courses, but basic knowledge with a solid sense. . Based on the school’s founding tradition, school motto and school philosophy, the school has formulated four basic qualities for general education: truth-seeking quality, belief quality, practical quality and general quality, in order to concretely implement the school’s ideals of general education. We hope that our students can develop their independent learning spirit and gradually develop their basic literacy in general education under the guidance of general education teachers, and look forward to lifelong learning. Each basic literacy has specific learning effectiveness indicators for self-examination of teaching and learning effectiveness, which are described below: Truth-seeking literacy (natural field): 1. Learn the methods or philosophy of natural science to explore physics and the subtleties of the living world, 2. Use the spirit of discussing matters as they are, 3. Be able to participate in public affairs related to scientific issues. Belief literacy (humanities field): 1. Learn the humanistic spirit to explore the inner self and understand the deep value of human civilization, 2. Develop self-discipline, 3. Be able to use rationality for moral reasoning. Practical literacy (social field): 1. Use social science methods or philosophy to stimulate students' listening and communication skills, 2. Recognize and respect diversity, 3. Practice the spirit of democratic deliberation. Hongtong literacy (cross-field): 1. Pursue the overall value of human beings, 2. Integrate qualities such as truth-seeking, faith, and practice into personal life. Courses in various fields can choose from different learning outcome indicators, so there is no need to be rigid.
(1)任冀平（2011），＜法院與政治：美國司法政治初探＞，（全球政治評論）第33期，頁73~95。 。
(2) 黃秀端（2003），＜少數政府在國會的困境＞，（台灣政治學刊）第7卷第2期，頁3~49。
(3) 盛杏湲 （2003），＜立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力：一致政府與分立政府的比較＞，（台灣政治學刊）第7卷第2期，頁51~105。
(4) 蘇子喬（2010），＜憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考＞，（政治科學論叢）第44期，頁35~74。
(5) 蕭怡靖（2005），＜我國立法院資深制度之探討—委員會遊走及召集委員深制度之變遷＞，（政治科學論叢）第25期，頁105~134。
(6) 廖達琪（2005），＜「橡皮圖章」如何轉變為「河東獅吼」？──立法院在台灣民主化過程中角色轉變之探究（1950-2000）＞，（人文及社會科學集刊）第17卷第2期，頁343~391。
(7) 沈有忠（2009），＜德國議會民主的發展：從威瑪憲法到基本法＞，（思與言）第47卷第3期，頁27~65。
(8) 吳重禮（2006），＜美國分立政府的運作經驗及其啟示＞，（問題與研究）第45卷第3期，頁133~166。
(9) 沈有忠（2005），＜制度制約下的行政與立法關係：以我國九七憲改後的憲政運作為例＞，（政治科學論叢）第23期，頁27~60。
(10) 鄭明德（2005），＜民進黨立法院黨團組織問題之研究＞，（政治科學論叢）第25期，頁135~166。
(12) 楊戊龍（2006），＜美國聯邦政府保護揭弊公務員之制度與發展＞，（政治科學論叢）第29期，頁83~122。
(13) 沈有忠（2006），＜德國威瑪共和的憲法：一個半總統制的個案研究＞，（東吳政治學報）第24期，頁163~212。
(14) 蕭怡靖（2007），＜我國立法委員選擇常設委員會之研究：以第五屆立法委員為例＞，（東吳政治學報）第25卷第3期，頁131~182。
(15) 陳宏銘（2007），＜臺灣半總統制下「少數政府」的存續：2000-2004＞，（東吳政治學報）第25卷第4期，頁1~64。
(16) 劉鐵軍（2007），＜法國憲法修正案與權力制衡之研究＞，（東吳政治學報）第25卷第4期，頁65~91。
(17) 黃德福、蘇子喬（2007），＜大法官釋憲對我國憲政體制的形塑＞，（臺灣民主季刊）第4卷第1期，頁1~49。
(18) 盛治仁（2006），＜單一選區兩票制對未來臺灣政黨政治發展之可能影響探討＞，（臺灣民主季刊）第3卷第2期，頁63~86。
(19) 林繼文（2003），＜憲法作為一種制度＞，（政治與社會哲學評論）第5期，頁35~74。
(20) 陳宏銘、蔡榮祥（2008），＜選舉時程對政府組成型態的牽引力：半總統制經驗之＞，（東吳政治學報）第26卷第2期，頁117~180。
(21)林繼文（2009），＜共治可能成為半總統制的憲政慣例嗎？ 法國與台灣的比較＞，（東吳政治學報）第27卷第1期，頁1~51
(22)韓保中（2007），＜憲政與行政：論威爾遜＜行政的研究＞的緣起與意義＞，（政治科學論叢）第34期，頁105~150。
(1) Ren Jiping (2011), "Courts and Politics: A Preliminary Study of American Judicial Politics", (Global Politics Review) No. 33, pp. 73~95. .
(2) Huang Xiuduan (2003), "The Dilemma of the Minority Government in Congress", (Taiwan Political Science Journal), Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 3~49.
(3) Sheng Xingyi (2003), "The Influence of Legislative and Executive Agencies in the Legislative Process: Comparison of Unified Government and Divided Government", (Taiwan Political Science Journal), Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 51~105 .
(4) Su Ziqiao (2010), "Thoughts on supporting the constitutional system and electoral system", (Political Science Series), Issue 44, pp. 35~74.
(5) Xiao Yijing (2005), "Discussion on the seniority system of my country's Legislative Yuan - changes in the system of committee wandering and convening committee members", (Political Science Series), Issue 25, pp. 105~134.
(6) Liao Daqi (2005), "How does a "rubber stamp" transform into a "Hedong lion's roar"? ──An exploration of the changing role of the Legislative Yuan in the process of Taiwan's democratization (1950-2000)>, (Humanities and Social Sciences), Volume 17, Issue 2, pp. 343~391.
(7) Shen Youzhong (2009), "The Development of German Parliamentary Democracy: From the Weimar Constitution to the Basic Law", (Thoughts and Words), Volume 47, Issue 3, pp. 27~65.
(8) Wu Chongli (2006), "The operational experience of divided government in the United States and its implications", (Issue and Research), Volume 45, Issue 3, pp. 133~166.
(9) Shen Youzhong (2005), "The relationship between administration and legislation under institutional constraints: Taking the operation of constitutional government after my country's 1997 constitutional reform as an example", (Political Science Series), Issue 23, pp. 27~60.
(10) Zheng Mingde (2005), "Research on the Organizational Issues of the Legislative Yuan of the Democratic Progressive Party", (Political Science Series), Issue 25, pp. 135~166.
(12) Yang Wulong (2006), "The system and development of the U.S. federal government's protection of civil servants who expose fraud", (Political Science Series), Issue 29, pp. 83~122.
(13) Shen Youzhong (2006), "The Constitution of the German Weimar Republic: A Case Study of a Semi-Presidential System", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Issue 24, pp. 163~212.
(14) Xiao Yijing (2007), "Research on the Standing Committee for Selection of Legislators in my country: Taking the Fifth Legislator as an Example", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 25, Issue 3, pp. 131~182.
(15) Chen Hongming (2007), "The Survival of "Minority Government" under Taiwan's Semi-Presidential System: 2000-2004", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 1~64.
(16) Liu Tiejun (2007), "Research on Amendments to the French Constitution and Checks and Balances of Power", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 25, Issue 4, pp. 65~91.
(17) Huang Defu and Su Ziqiao (2007), "The Shaping of my country's Constitutional System by the Justices' Interpretation of the Constitution", (Taiwan Democracy Quarterly), Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 1~49.
(18) Sheng Zhiren (2006), "A discussion on the possible impact of the two-vote system in a single constituency on the future development of Taiwan's party politics", (Taiwan Democracy Quarterly), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 63~86.
(19) Lin Jiwen (2003), "Constitution as a System", (Political and Social Philosophy Review), Issue 5, pp. 35~74.
(20) Chen Hongming and Cai Rongxiang (2008), "The pulling force of the election schedule on the government composition type: the experience of semi-presidential system", (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 26, Issue 2, pp. 117~180.
(21) Lin Jiwen (2009), "Can co-governance become a constitutional practice of semi-presidential system?" Comparison between France and Taiwan>, (Journal of Soochow Political Science), Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 1~51
(22) Han Baozhong (2007), "Constitutionalism and Administration: On the Origin and Significance of Wilson's "Research on Administration"", (Political Science Series), Issue 34, pp. 105~150.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 出席上課出席上課 attend class |
5 | |
| 期中考期中考 midterm exam |
33 | |
| 期末考期末考 final exam |
33 | |
| 讀書報告讀書報告 book report |
33 |
