面對氣候變遷、全球化、城鄉轉化、社會人口老化、社會階層分離等現象，未來和景觀專業相關在自然生態、社會經濟、文化差異等面向上都會有強烈變化產生，本課程目標即是面臨這些變化時整理和景觀專業相關議題與探討可能的趨勢未來。
內容包括在觀念面、整合面與技術面三個面向。如韌性城市、智慧城市、大數據分析氣候變遷、共融設計、公園生態化、都市生態、景觀都市主義、景觀績效、永續基地指標、互連網與景觀、可食地景/生產地景、高齡化社會與景觀、參與式規劃設計等趨勢之討論。
Faced with climate change, globalization, urban transformation, social population aging, social level separation and other phenomena, there will be strong changes in the future related to landscape tourism profession, such as natural ecology, social economy, and cultural differences. The goal of this course is to face these changes and to explore possible trends in the future.
The content includes three aspects: conceptual aspect, integration aspect and technical aspect. Discussions on trends such as non-superior cities, smart cities, large-scale analysis of climate change, inclusive design, park ecosystem, urban ecology, landscape urbanism, landscape performance, permanent base indicators, interconnected and landscape, edible landscape/production landscape, high-evolving social and landscape, participation planning design and other trends.
1. 趨勢力 Robert J. Shapiro 吳國卿譯 財信出版
2. 未來一百年大預測 George Friedman 吳孟儒 等譯 木馬文化
3. 其他補充資料。
a. Bubalo, M., van Zanten, B. T., & Verburg, P. H. (2019). Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 184, 101-111.
b. Haase, G., & Richter, H. (1983). Current trends in landscape research. GeoJournal, 7(2), 107-119.
c. Lundberg, A. (2018). Recent methods, sources and approaches in the study of temporal landscape change at different scales-a review. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 67(4), 309-318.
d. Prior, J. (2017). Sonic environmental aesthetics and landscape research. Landscape research, 42(1), 6-17.
e. Simensen, T., Halvorsen, R., & Erikstad, L. (2018). Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review. Land Use Policy, 75, 557-569.
f. Solecka, I. (2019). The use of landscape value assessment in spatial planning and sustainable land management—a review. Landscape research, 44(8), 966-981.
g. Steen Jacobsen, J. K. (2007). Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: A review of photo-based research approaches. Tourism Geographies, 9(3), 234-253.
h. Vicenzotti, V., Jorgensen, A., Qviström, M., & Swaffield, S. (2016). Forty years of landscape research. Landscape research, 41(4), 388-407.
1. Trend Force Robert J. Shapiro Wu Guoqing Translation Financial Letter Publishing
2. A big prediction for the next 100 years George Friedman Wu Mengru et al. Translation Muma Culture
3. Other supplementary information.
a. Bubalo, M., van Zanten, B. T., & Verburg, P. H. (2019). Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 184, 101-111.
b. Haase, G., & Richter, H. (1983). Current trends in landscape research. GeoJournal, 7(2), 107-119.
c. Lundberg, A. (2018). Recent methods, sources and approaches in the study of temporal landscape change at different scales-a review. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 67(4), 309-318.
d. Prior, J. (2017). Sonic environmental aesthetics and landscape research. Landscape research, 42(1), 6-17.
e. Simensen, T., Halvorsen, R., & Erikstad, L. (2018). Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review. Land Use Policy, 75, 557-569.
f. Solecka, I. (2019). The use of landscape value assessment in spatial planning and sustainable land management—a review. Landscape research, 44(8), 966-981.
g. Steen Jacobsen, J. K. (2007). Use of landscape perception methods in tourism studies: A review of photo-based research approaches. Tourism Geographics, 9(3), 234-253.
h. Vicenzotti, V., Jorgensen, A., Qviström, M., & Swaffield, S. (2016). Forty years of landscape research. Landscape research, 41(4), 388-407.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|
