1980年代中期以來，民主社會已逐漸由過去「選舉為中心」的投票民主，轉向以「討論為中心」的審議式民主，主張公民才是民主體制的參與主體，所有受決策影響的公民或其代表，都應透過知情、理性、平等的社會溝通後參與集體決定。自2015至2018年，臺中市已分別於中區、清水、豐原、大里、南區、東勢、東區、大雅等行政區執行「參與式預算」（Participatory Budgeting），此一起源於巴西愉港（Porto Alegre）的公民參與都市治理政策，是審議民主（Deliberative Democracy）在臺灣最重要的公民參與模式之一。由於臺中市政府已於2019年不再辦理「參與式預算」，本課程回顧臺中市參與式預算四年執行中由市民提案關注的都市議題，選取與公民日常生活密切相關的「審議民主」、「新移民/移工」、「空污/食農」、「展示溝通」等主題，提供修課同學進行社會溝通實作，並依「問題研析、實作方法、批判反思」三階段進行。修課學生將有機會至臺中市審議民主現場參與活動或上課，藉此體悟公民治理精神，並對社會溝通現況提出批判，檢視公民參與在臺中市之實踐及更多可能性。因此，公民參與既是本課程內容，同時也是問題意識，而社會溝通實作則為方法，一方面促進修課同學理解社會現實，另一方面則鼓勵其對臺灣社會問題提出社會學批判。Since the mid-1980s, democratic societies have gradually shifted from the "selected as the center" voting democracy in the past to the "discussion-centered" appraisal democracy. The proactive citizens are the participation of the democratic system. All citizens or their representatives affected by the decision should participate in collective decisions through informed, rational and equal social communication. From 2015 to 2018, Taichung City has implemented "participatory budgeting" in administrative regions such as Central District, Qingshui, Hongyuan, Dali, South District, Dongxi, East District, and Daya. This originated from the citizen participation and urban governance policy of Porto Alegre, Brazil, and is one of the most important citizen participation models for Deliberative Democracy in Taiwan. Since the Taichung Municipal Government has no longer handled "participation budget" in 2019, this course reviews urban discussions that are concerned by citizens' proposals during the four-year implementation of the Taiwan City Participation budget. It selects topics such as "Approval Democracy", "New Immigration/Immigration", "Empty Pollution/Food and Farming", and "Display Communication" that are closely related to citizens' daily lives. It provides students with social communication practices and conducts them in the three stages of "question analysis, practical methods, and critical reflection". Students will have the opportunity to go to Taichung City to review democratic venues for activities or attend classes, so as to understand the spirit of civic governance, and criticize the current situation of social communication, and view the reality and more possibilities of civic participation in Taichung City. Therefore, citizen participation is not only the content of this course, but also the concept of problematics. Social communication practices are a method. On the one hand, it promotes students to understand social reality in the course, and on the other hand, it encourages them to propose social criticism of Taiwan’s social issues.
1. C. Wright Mills著，張君玫、劉鈐佑譯，1995，《社會學的想像》。臺北市：巨流。
2. Jon Elster主編，李宗義、許雅淑譯，2010，《審議民主》。臺北市：群學。
1. Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Elizabeth .A. Bennett, Alissa Cordner, Peter T. Klein and Stephanie Savell. 2015. The Civic Imagination: Making a Difference in American Political Life: Taylor & Francis.
2. John Gastil、Peter Levine，劉介修、陳逸玲譯，2012，《審議民主指南：21世紀公民參與的有效策略》，臺北市：群學。
3. 山崎亮，莊雅琇譯，2015，《社區設計：重新思考「社區」定義，不只設計空間，更要設計「人與人之間的連結」》，臺北市：臉譜。
1. C. Wright Mills, Zhang Junmei and Liu Youlu, 1995, "Imagination of Social Science". Taipei City: Juliu.
2. Editor of Jon Elster, Li Zongyi and Xu Yashulu, 2010, "Appreciation of Democracy". Taipei City: Group studies.
1. Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, Elizabeth .A. Bennett, Alissa Cordner, Peter T. Klein and Stephanie Savell. 2015. The Civic Imagination: Making a Difference in American Political Life: Taylor & Francis.
2. John Gastil, Peter Levine, Liu Jiexiu, Chen Yiling, 2012, "Guidelines for Reviewing Democracy: Effective Strategies for the Participation of 21st Century Citizens", Taipei City: Groups.
3. Ryo Yamazaki, Shun Yasui, 2015, "Community Design: Rethinking the definition of "community", not only designing space, but also designing "the connection between people"", Taipei City: Face.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|
