以前，我對於「理論」的認識與理解大約就是「」。這幾
年來的心得，也許可以再進一步闡述。我試著藉由「理論」與「觀點」的區分，並以
一種接近「理念型」（這個概念，相信妳／你們上個學期已經學習過。）的表述方式
說明：「理論」是以一種「觀點」，對「事實」加以考察，試圖對「事實」提出是什
麼以及為什麼，並且何以致此的緣由。
上述的說明可以藉由董啟章在《地圖集 》(2011)的一段文字獲得參照性的釐清，請
各位琢磨玩味：
也就是說，對於「理論」的理解與想像，必須擺脫傳統以來機械般的「
」客觀反映說，而要適當地認識到理論是基於某個特定觀點，對事實考察所採取的
立場解釋，也就是「」的主觀詮釋說。簡單而言，針對同一社會事
實，持以不同的觀點看待，會有不同的理論解釋。（鄭志成）

In the past, my understanding and understanding of "theory" was probably "". These
The experience of the years can be described further. I tried to divide "theory" and "view" into the division of "theory" and
A way of expressing it that is close to "ideology" (I believe you/you have learned this concept in the last period of your studies).
Explanation: "Theory" uses a kind of "view" to examine "facts" and what is the test proposal for "facts"?
And why, and why.
The above explanation can be obtained through a reference clearing through a paragraph of Dong Qizhang's "Map Collection" (2011). Please
Everyone thinks about it:
In other words, the understanding and imagination of "theory" must be eliminated from the traditional mechanical "
"The object of view reflects that we should understand appropriately that theory is based on a specific viewpoint and takes practical investigation.
The stand-alone explanation, that is, the main view of "". Simply put, to the same social affairs
In fact, if you look at it from different perspectives, you will have different theoretical explanations. (Zheng Zhicheng)

Martuccelli, Danilo（達尼洛‧馬爾圖切利）／姜志輝譯：
。南京：譯林，2007。【Orig. Danilo Martuccelli: Sociologies
de la modernité. Paris: Gallimard, 1999.】
 Baert, Patirck（帕特里克‧貝爾特）、Carreira da Silva, Filipe（菲利佩‧卡雷
拉‧達‧席爾瓦）／瞿鐵鵬譯： 。北京：商務，
2014 。【Orig. Patirck Baert, Filipe Carreira da Silva: Social Theory in the
Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.】
 Callinicos, Alex／簡守邦譯： 。2004 年革新重譯本，原舊
版書名《社會學理論思想的流變》。台北縣永和市：韋伯文化，2004。
【Orig. Alex Callinicos: Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. London: Polity
Press, 1999.】
 Cuff, E. C.、Sharrock, W. W.、Francis, D. W.／林秀麗、林庭瑤、洪惠芬譯：
。台北縣永和市：韋伯文化，2008。【Orig. E. C. Cuff,
W. W. Sharrock, D. W. Francis: Perspectives in Sociology. London; New York:
Routledge, 1998.】
 Ritzer, George（喬治•雷瑟）、Goodman, Douglas（道格拉斯•古德曼）著／
柯朝欽、鄭祖邦譯： 。第六版。臺北市：巨流，
2004、2005。【Orig. George Ritzer, Goodman, Douglas: Sociological Theory.
Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill 2004.】
其餘課程內容相關參考文獻將於課程中隨時介紹及說明。

Martuccelli, Danilo/Jiang Zhihui:
. Nanjing: Lu Lin, 2007. 【Orig. Danilo Martuccelli: Sociologies
de la modernité. Paris: Gallimard, 1999.】
 Baert, Patirck, Carreira da Silva, Filipe
La Da Silva)/Qu Zhilu: . Beijing: Business,
2014. 【Orig. Patirck Baert, Filipe Carreira da Silva: Social Theory in the
Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.】
 Callinicos, Alex/家华华: . 2004 Reform and reprinted version, original
The book title is "The Changes of Social Theory Thoughts". Yonghe City, Taipei County: Weibo Culture, 2004.
【Orig. Alex Callinicos: Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. London: Polity
Press, 1999.】
 Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W., Francis, D. W./Lin Xiuli, Lin Ting-yung, Hong Huifen:
. Yonghe City, Taipei County: Weibo Culture, 2008. 【Orig. E. C. Cuff,
W. W. Sharrock, D. W. Francis: Perspectives in Sociology. London; New York:
Routledge, 1998.】
 by Ritzer, George, Goodman, Douglas /
Ke Chaoxian and Zheng Zubang's translation: . Sixth Edition. Taipei City: Juliu,
2004, 2005. 【Orig. George Ritzer, Goodman, Douglas: Sociological Theory.
Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill 2004.】
The remaining course content-related references will be introduced and explained at any time during the course.