透過多個案研究，尤其東海大學校園校舍有形文化資產之價值評估，闡述建築藝術批評之意義與內涵。本課將提出批評建築作品之方法論與技術，彰顯其在提升學術界建築研究以及專業界建築設計水平力道之途徑，以及其與地域或全球建築史、理論之關連。進而將之關連起有形文化資產保存實務中，闡明其與文資本身歷史、文、藝術美學、科技、社會價值之發掘，亦及與文資保存工作核心範疇的密切關係。
於上述課程所傳授之知能，期盼可提升同學自我建築設計發展過程中 反省評估各種方案之能力。同時明瞭到，若要從事文資保存專業時，該儲備關鍵知能以辨明文資之價值所在。甚而對有志攅研建築史、理論領域，而進入建築批評專業的同學，有所啟發，並儲備基礎能力。 Through multiple case studies, especially the value evaluation of the tangible cultural assets of the campus buildings of Donghai University, the meaning and connotation of the criticism of architecture art. This course will propose methodological discussions and techniques for criticizing architectural works, highlighting their paths to improve the level of architecture research in the academic community and the professional community's architecture design, as well as their connection with regional or global architectural history and theory. In addition, it connects the tangible cultural assets to preserve and realize its close relationship with the historical, literary, artistic aesthetics, science and technology, and social value of cultural assets itself, as well as its close relationship with the core scope of cultural assets preservation work.
The knowledge taught in the above courses is expected to improve students' ability to reflect and evaluate various solutions during the development of self-construction design. At the same time, it is clear that if you want to work in the professional preservation of cultural resources, you should provide key knowledge to identify the value of cultural resources. Even students who are interested in the field of architectural history and theory and enter the architectural criticism major have some development and have basic capabilities.
Frampton, Kenneth. “Critical Regionalism: Modern Architecture and Cultural Identity”, in Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames & Hudson, 1985: 313-327.
Bruno Zevi（1950）. Towards an Organic Architecture. Faber & Faber, London
Bruno Zevi（1957）. Architecture as Space: How to Look at Architecture. Horizon Press, New York. （2001）。張似贊 譯。如何看建築。田園城市文化
Bruno Zevi（1978）. The Modern Language of Architecture. University of Washington Press. （1992）。施植明 譯《建築的現代語言》。博遠出版
邱浩修、關華山、羅時瑋（2018）。東海大學校園文化資產保存綱要計畫（期末報告）。東海大學建築學系
祝曉峰（2015）。形制的新生：陳其寬在東海大學的建築探索。中國建築學報。2015年第01期。No.556：pp. 80-87
陳其寬（1985）。參與東海生長的醞釀、規劃東海景觀的成長。東海三十年。東海大學校史編纂委員會。pp. 25-26
張晉維（2018）。哈佛設計學院的高端現代主義者：貝聿銘、華特．葛羅培斯、以及TAC華東∕東海大學。18th海峽兩岸大學的校園學術研討會論文集。南京大學建築與城市規劃學院。pp. 253-265
趙建中（2012）。大度山林—七十年代大學校園回憶錄。東海建築系
許焯權 (1999) 。空間的文化—建築評論文集 香港 青文書局
施植明 譯 (1998) Colquhoum, Alan 著 (1981) 。建築評論論文集—現代建築與歷史變遷 台北 田園城市文化事業
Tafuri, Manfredo (1986) 。There is no criticism, only history。Design Book Review, no. 9, spring.
郭文亮 (2006) 。近代台灣與中國建築論述形構之初探
(2005) 。做的/說的/想的：洛韶山莊與漢寶德先生早年建築策略
鄭時齡 (2001) 。建築批評學 北京 中國建築工業出版社
卡斯驣。哈里斯 著 (1998) 陳朝暉 譯 (2001) 。建築的倫理功能 北京 華夏出版社
漢寶德 (2006) 。中國建築文化講座 北京 生活讀書新知三聯書店
遠見 (2007) 。創意是教出來的 遠見 no. 247, 2007年1月號 台北
Frampton, Kenneth. “Critical Regionalism: Modern Architecture and Cultural Identity”, in Modern Architecture: A Critical History. London: Thames & Hudson, 1985: 313-327.
Bruno Zevi (1950). Towards an Organic Architecture. Faber & Faber, London
Bruno Zevi (1957). Architecture as Space: How to Look at Architecture. Horizon Press, New York. (2001). Zhang Sixuan translated. How to view the architecture. Garden City Culture
Bruno Zevi (1978). The Modern Language of Architecture. University of Washington Press. (1992). Shizhiming translated "Modern Language of Architecture". Bofen Publishing
Qiu Haoxiu, Guan Huashan, Luo Shiwei (2018). The key plan for preservation of cultural assets of Donghai University campus (final report). Department of Architecture, Donghai University
Zhu Xiaofeng (2015). A new student of shape: Chen Qimao's exploration of architecture at Donghai University. China Architecture Journal. 2015 Issue 01. No.556: pp. 80-87
Chen Qibian (1985). Participate in the growth of Donghai’s growing water and plan the growth of Donghai’s landscape. Thirty years of Donghai. Donghai University History Compilation Committee. pp. 25-26
Zhang Hanhui (2018). High-end modernists at Harvard Design Institute: Betty and Huatte. Gropez, and TAC Huadong/Tonghai University. A collection of essays of the campus academic seminar of Cross-Strait University in the 18th Sea Island. Nanjing University Architecture and Urban Planning Institute. pp. 253-265
Zhao Jianzhong (2012). Dadu Mountain Forest - Recalling of the University Campus in the 1970s. Donghai Architecture System
Xu Zhuoquan (1999). Culture of Space—A Collection of Architecture Reviews Hong Kong Qingwen Books Bureau
Shizhiming (1998) Colquhoum, Alan (1981). Collection of Architecture Reviews—Modern Architecture and Historical Changes Taipei City Cultural Affairs
Tafuri, Manfredo (1986). There is no criticalism, only history. Design Book Review, no. 9, spring.
Guo Wenliang (2006). A preliminary study on the structural representations of modern Taiwan and China
(2005). What I did/speak/think: Mr. Luoshaoshan Zhuang and Mr. Hanbaode’s early architectural strategy
Zheng Time (2001). Architecture Criticism Beijing China Construction Industry Press
Cassia. by Harris (1998) by Chen Chaoxi (2001). The ethical function of the architecture Beijing Huaxia Publishing House
Hanbaode (2006). China Architecture Culture Lecture Beijing Life Reading New Knowledge Three Links Store
Distance (2007). Creativity is taught far away no. 247, January 2007 Taipei
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1. 期中作業 a.批評文章(35%) b.期末作業提案完整度(8%) 2. 期末作業 a.批評論文(47%) b.口頭ppt.發表(10%) 1. 期中作業 a.批評文章(35%) b.期末作業提案完整度(8%) 2. 期末作業 a.批評論文(47%) b.口頭ppt.發表(10%) 1. Midterm work a. Criticism article (35%) b. Finality of proposals for the final work (8%) 2. Final work a. Criticism article (47%) b. Oral ppt. Publish (10%) |
100 |
