在社會工作短短一百多年的發展歷史中，一直有個「擔心自己不夠專業」的生存焦慮。而美國社會工作的專業化過程，就是一個追求「科學地位」，且是以「醫學」為仿效對象的專業化歷程；繼受美國社會工作的台灣，也承接了這樣的專業發展架構與思維。
本課程希望我們一起來針對同一議題、不同觀看角度的論文，來進行閱讀、對話、討論、分享，讓自己有機會來重新理解及重看社會工作，例如針對「以證據為基礎的社會工作」這個議題，「科學化」、「醫療化」的觀點怎麼看，「人本主義」、「詮釋取向」的觀點怎麼看。只有不斷地重新理解及重看社會工作，才有移動的可能，進而有多元的社會工作知識生產，這便是本課程的核心理念。此外，本課程也希望協助修課同學了解如何閱讀文獻，並對一個議題進行思辯；透過這種能力的培養，增進自己深度思度的能力，並帶著這樣的能力，為社會工作的知識生產及實踐貢獻一己之力。
In the development history of social work for more than 100 years, there has always been a survival anxiety of "being worried about not being proficient". The professionalization process of American social work is a professionalization process that pursues "scientific status" and uses "medical" as an object to imitate it; Taiwan, which is affected by American social work, has also undertaken such professional development structure and thinking.
This course hopes that we will read, talk, discuss and share articles from the same topic and different perspectives, so that we can have the opportunity to re-understand and re-view social work, such as the topic of "certification-based social work", how to view the views of "scientificization", "medicalization", and "humanism", and "describing orientation". Only by constantly re-understanding and re-viewing social work can there be a possibility of movement and diversified social work knowledge production. This is the core concept of this course. In addition, this course also hopes to assist students in learning how to read articles and think about a topic; through the cultivation of this ability, they can enhance their ability to think deeply, and with such ability, they can contribute their own efforts to the knowledge production and practice of social work.
Wenocur, S., & M. Reisch (1989). From Charity to Enterprise: The Development of American Social Work in a Market Economy. Urbana, IL: University
李維倫、莫少依（2004）。〈生活世界取向的心理衡鑑：一種本化的可能性〉。《本土心理學研究》，第24期，頁85-135。
汪淑媛（2011）。〈社會工作紀錄問題檢視〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，第15卷第2期，頁141-185。
張英陣（2006）。〈Mind the Gap：研究與實務的整合〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，第10卷第2期，頁87-116
張英陣、鄭怡世（2012）。〈再探 Jane Addams 的社區工作理念〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，第16卷第1期，頁87-132。
許展耀、鄭怡世（2017）。〈什麼是「證據」？「以證據為基礎的社會工作」中證據知識的再思考〉。（未發表論文，請勿引用）
劉佑強、劉益昌（2016）。〈臺中市兒少保護安全評估決策模式執行概況初探：以臺中市兒少保護服務為例〉，發表於「防暴拾穗，守護十年」論壇。臺中：臺中市家庭暴力及性侵害防治中心。
劉淑瓊、楊佩榮（2013）。〈臺灣兒保安全評估的應然與實然分析〉。衛生福利部委託研究案期末報告。（口頭報告檔，請勿引用）
鄭怡世（2019）。〈揭露文本的沉默性：以批判論述分析方法應用於「曹小妹事件調查報告」為例〉，《臺大社工學刊》，第39期，頁57-104。
Wenocur, S., & M. Reisch (1989). From Charity to Enterprise: The Development of American Social Work in a Market Economy. Urbana, IL: University
Li Weilun and Mo Shaoyi (2004). 〈Psychological Comparison of Life World Orientation: A Possibilities of Substantiation〉. "Research on Local Psychology", Issue 24, Pages 85-135.
Wang Shuyuan (2011).
Zhang Yingyan (2006). 〈Mind the Gap: Integration of Research and Practice〉. "Journal of Social Policy and Social Work", Volume 10, Issue 2, Page 87-116
Zhang Yingyan, Zheng Yishi (2012). 〈Another explore Jane Addams’ community work philosophy〉, Journal of Social Policy and Social Work, Vol. 16, Issue 1, Page 87-132.
Xu Zhanyao and Zheng Yishi (2017). 〈What is "certification"? Rethinking on Knowledge in "Social Work Based on Certification". (No citation is required)
Liu Youqiang, Liu Yichang (2016). , it was published in the forum on “Rampage Prevention, Ten Years of Protection”. Taichung: Taichung City Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Prevention and Control Center.
Liu Shu-chan, Yang Pei-rong (2013). 〈Responsive and realistic analysis of Taiwan's security assessment〉. The Ministry of Health and Welfare commissioned the final report on the case. (Oral report file, please do not quote)
Zheng Yishi (2019). "Exposing the Silence of the Text: Using the Critical Analysis Method to Apply "Cao Xiaomei Incident Investigation Report" as an Example", "Taiwan University Social Work Journal", Issue 39, Pages 57-104.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂報告與討論課堂報告與討論 Class Report and Discussion |
70 | |
| 期末作業期末作業 Final operation |
30 |
