民法債編總論乃民事財產法體系之一環,與吾人日常生活息息相關。而作為債之通則,其規範內容所涉者,不乏抽象之基礎概念,故本學期課程將在上學期課程所建立之基石上,透過依序引介法條之設計目的、要件內涵等,並適時針對其中所生之重要爭議議題,搭配學說見解與司法實務之看法進行補充,力求結合多元面向,以進一步培養學生獨立思考、批判分析法律問題之能力。另一方面,透過課程進行中的實例討論,亦使學生得以再次自我檢視其對債編總論之架構與相關概念之掌握程度。The general discussion of civil law debt is one of the civil property legal systems and is closely related to our daily lives. As a general rule of debt, the content of its specifications involves abstract basic concepts. Therefore, this course will be based on the cornerstones established by the previous course, through the introduction of the design purpose, the connotation of the law in sequence, and the important disputes arising from it, and combine them with the views on academic explanations and judicial practices to integrate diverse aspects to further cultivate students' ability to think independently and analyze legal problems. On the other hand, through the example discussions in the course, students can once again examine their degree of mastery of the structure and related concepts of the debt compilation summary.
研究民法上所規定的債之通則,就債的發生、標的、效力、移轉、消滅與多數債務人及多數債權人等之理論與實踐。債法 具有交易法的色彩,於今日人與人接觸頻繁,發生財產上的權利義務關係甚多之情形下,最為重要。
Study the rules of debt stipulated in civil law, and conduct the theory and practice of debt occurrence, labeling, effectiveness, transfer, consumption and the theory and implementation of debts. Debt law has the color of trading law. It is most important when people are in contact with each other today and there are many property rights and relations.
邱聰智 著;姚志明 修訂,新訂民法債編通則(上) (新訂二版)
邱聰智 著;姚志明 修訂,新訂民法債編通則(下) (新訂二版)
Written by Qiu Tengzhi; revised by Yao Zhiming, newly-ordered Civil Law Debt Encouragement (Part 1) (Newly-ordered Second Edition)
Written by Qiu Tengzhi; revised by Yao Zhiming, newly-ordered Civil Law Debt Encouragement (Part 2) (Newly-ordered Second Edition)
評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
---|---|---|
期中考期中考 Midterm exam |
40 | 筆試、以案例式實例題為主 |
期末考期末考 Final exam |
40 | 筆試、以案例式實例題為主;或舉行口試 |
平時成績平時成績 Regular achievements |
20 | 以出席率及課堂參與度等作為評分基準 |