兩岸關係具有相當錯綜複雜的特性，因為它不僅有歷史遺留的問題與情結，也有現實所帶來的衝突與糾葛，很難用一般研究的方法就能輕易解釋它的問題或是衝突。加上目前兩岸關係形成的歷史因素與現實政治，在過去與現今的國際社會上也不容易找到一個可以完全比擬與對照的例子，因此即使竭其所能，想運用一個適當的理論或模式來解釋兩岸關係或解決兩岸衝突，但仍然處在一種「驗證」的階段，至少並未就此全盤被有效應用。
目前在國內，較多運用西方理論模式來解釋兩岸關係，是一批專業領域本就偏重在國際政治或國際關係方面的學者，但其本身某些部分研究已轉而投注在兩岸關係的探討。他們均是學有所精，認為「要將兩岸互動的過程與未來的發展來加以詮釋，第一步必然是尋找可以適用於兩岸關係的理論通則，然後利用通則的解釋和預測能力來分析兩岸關係。」 在這樣的期盼下，至少現階段已有多種理論或模式已被廣泛運用以及討論。
而兩岸關係的研究十分的廣泛，從兩岸關係的歷史變遷、台北的大陸政策、北京的對台政策、兩岸的協商與談判，皆是研究的對象與重點。研究上除了傳統的採歷史途徑說明兩岸關係的演變及文件分析台北及北京當局的兩岸政策內容之外，學者提出運用一些研究國際政治及政治學等社會科學的方法理論也甚多，運用在分析兩岸關係的研究分類上，大致可以分為解釋兩岸互動關係的理論解釋兩岸協商與談判的雙方互動的理論，分析制訂大陸政策的理論以及探討兩岸未來整合機制的一些理論探討。
Cross-strait relations have a very complicated characteristic because they not only have historical problems and circumstances, but also have conflicts and nuisances brought by reality. It is difficult to easily solve their problems or conflicts by general research methods. In addition to the historical factors and real politics that have formed cross-strait relations at present, it is not easy to find an example that can be completely compared with the international community in the past and present. Therefore, even if we try our best to use an appropriate theory or model to explain cross-strait relations or resolve cross-strait conflicts, it is still in a "verified" stage, and at least it has not been effectively applied in the entire market.
Currently, in China, we use Western theoretical models to explain cross-strait relations and are a group of scholars whose professional fields are already focused on international politics or international relations, but some of their research has been turned into an exploration of cross-strait relations. They all have some knowledge and believe that "to discuss the process of cross-strait interaction with future development, the first step must be to find theoretical protocols that can be applied to cross-strait relations, and then use the interpretation and prediction capabilities of the protocol to analyze cross-strait relations." With such expectations, at least at this stage, many theoretical discussions or models have been widely used and discussed.
The research on cross-strait relations is very extensive. From the historical changes of cross-strait relations, Taipei's mainland policy, Beijing's policy to Taiwan, and cross-strait consultations and discussions are all the objects and key points of the research. In addition to the traditional historical perspectives to explain the evolution of cross-strait relations and document analysis of the content of cross-strait policies of the Taipei and Beijing authorities, scholars have proposed to use some methods and theory to study social sciences such as international politics and politics. In order to analyze the research classification of cross-strait relations, it can be roughly divided into theories that explain the theory of cross-strait interactions between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait consultation and discussion, analyze the theories of planning theories of large-scale policies and explore some theoretical explorations of future integration mechanisms between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
兩岸關係具有相當錯綜複雜的特性，因為它不僅有歷史遺留的問題與情結，也有現實所帶來的衝突與糾葛，很難用一般研究的方法就能輕易解釋它的問題或是衝突。加上目前兩岸關係形成的歷史因素與現實政治，在過去與現今的國際社會上也不容易找到一個可以完全比擬與對照的例子，因此即使竭其所能，想運用一個適當的理論或模式來解釋兩岸關係或解決兩岸衝突，但仍然處在一種「驗證」的階段，至少並未就此全盤被有效應用。
目前在國內，較多運用西方理論模式來解釋兩岸關係，是一批專業領域本就偏重在國際政治或國際關係方面的學者，但其本身某些部分研究已轉而投注在兩岸關係的探討。他們均是學有所精，認為「要將兩岸互動的過程與未來的發展來加以詮釋，第一步必然是尋找可以適用於兩岸關係的理論通則，然後利用通則的解釋和預測能力來分析兩岸關係。」 在這樣的期盼下，至少現階段已有多種理論或模式已被廣泛運用以及討論。
而兩岸關係的研究十分的廣泛，從兩岸關係的歷史變遷、台北的大陸政策、北京的對台政策、兩岸的協商與談判，皆是研究的對象與重點。研究上除了傳統的採歷史途徑說明兩岸關係的演變及文件分析台北及北京當局的兩岸政策內容之外，學者提出運用一些研究國際政治及政治學等社會科學的方法理論也甚多，運用在分析兩岸關係的研究分類上，大致可以分為解釋兩岸互動關係的理論解釋兩岸協商與談判的雙方互動的理論，分析制訂大陸政策的理論以及探討兩岸未來整合機制的一些理論探討。
Cross-strait relations have a very complicated characteristic because they not only have historical problems and circumstances, but also have conflicts and nuisances brought by reality. It is difficult to easily solve their problems or conflicts by general research methods. In addition to the historical factors and real politics that have formed cross-strait relations at present, it is not easy to find an example that can be completely compared with the international community in the past and present. Therefore, even if we try our best to use an appropriate theory or model to explain cross-strait relations or resolve cross-strait conflicts, it is still in a "verified" stage, and at least it has not been effectively applied in the entire market.
Currently, in China, we use Western theoretical models to explain cross-strait relations and are a group of scholars whose professional fields are already focused on international politics or international relations, but some of their research has been turned into an exploration of cross-strait relations. They all have some knowledge and believe that "to discuss the process of cross-strait interaction with future development, the first step must be to find theoretical protocols that can be applied to cross-strait relations, and then use the interpretation and prediction capabilities of the protocol to analyze cross-strait relations." With such expectations, at least at this stage, many theoretical discussions or models have been widely used and discussed.
The research on cross-strait relations is very extensive. From the historical changes of cross-strait relations, Taipei's mainland policy, Beijing's policy to Taiwan, and cross-strait consultations and discussions are all the objects and key points of the research. In addition to the traditional historical perspectives to explain the evolution of cross-strait relations and document analysis of the content of cross-strait policies of the Taipei and Beijing authorities, scholars have proposed to use some methods and theory to study social sciences such as international politics and politics. In order to analyze the research classification of cross-strait relations, it can be roughly divided into theories that explain the theory of cross-strait interactions between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait consultation and discussion, analyze the theories of planning theories of large-scale policies and explore some theoretical explorations of future integration mechanisms between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.
兩岸關係研究（第三版）
Cross-strait relations research (third edition)
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 出席出席 Attend |
20 | |
| 口頭報告口頭報告 Oral Report |
30 | |
| 書面報告書面報告 Written Report |
50 |
