因為網路科技的發達，造就了沉浸在數位世界的網路青年、甚至網路老年。這種發展，讓主流社會輿論把握每次重大社會事件（例如，隨機殺人），批評虛擬世界對青少年身心的危害。網路世界當真是罪惡的淵藪嗎？
不，它讓我們過得更快樂、更便捷，更環保（電子公文、電子書...）、更有創意（學習），甚至創造出更多工作機會（ACG產業；學術研究議題）。一切看起來都那麼美好，不只是青少年，連大人們的世界也都因此受益！那些人又有什麼好狗吠的呢！
是啊，就經濟效用性質來看，數位科技的應用與壯大，幾乎是無可批評，也無法阻擋的；但正如動漫鋼之鍊金術師所凸顯的，這個世界是根據等價交換法則在運作的。我們因網路世界而有所得，但也終將因為沉浸其中而有所失。那麼，究竟我們將因此得到什麼，失去什麼？是得不償失呢？還是一椿高CP值的交易呢？恐怕就得冷靜下來好好思考了。
本課程就依著上述的等價交換原則，將數位世界放在虛擬世界這個更大的概念架構下，跨學科地結合社會學、心理學、哲學等觀點，佐以熱門的動漫、網路資訊及田野調查，探究網路世界的利弊得失，以期同學們能對數位世界對實際生活的影響，有更深入的體會。
Because of the development of Internet technology, web youths and even the Internet that are immersed in the digital world. This development allows mainstream public opinion to grasp every major social event (for example, random killing), criticize the harm of virtual worlds to the physical and mental of young people. Is the online world really sinful?
No, it makes us happy, more convenient, more environmentally friendly (electronic documents, e -books ...), more creative (learning), and even create more job opportunities (ACG industry; academic research issues). Everything looks so beautiful, not just teenagers, but even the world's world has benefited! What are the good dog barking!
Yes, in terms of economic utility, the application and growth of digital technology is almost irritating and unstoppable; but as the chain gold surgeon of anime steel is prominent, the world is based on the law of equivalent exchange. Operation. We have something due to the Internet world, but we will eventually lose because of immersion. So, what will we get and lose? Do you have to lose? Or is it a transaction of a high CP value? I'm afraid I have to calm down and think about it.
In accordance with the above -mentioned principles of equivalent exchange, this course places the digital world in the larger concept structure of the virtual world. And field surveys, exploring the advantages and disadvantages of the online world, and hope that students can have a deeper understanding of the impact of the digital world on actual life.
東野圭吾 2006《嫌疑犯X的獻身》。劉子倩譯。臺北：獨步文化。
強˙朗森 2016《鄉民公審》。戴至中譯。臺北：商周出版社
尤瑟夫˙皮柏 2009《閒暇》。劉森堯譯。臺北：立緒出版社。
Mann, Sandi 2017《無聊的價值》。林力敏譯。臺北：三采文化。
尼爾波茲曼 1994《童年的消逝》。蕭昭君譯。臺北：遠流出版社
Carr, Nicholas 2012《網路讓我們變笨》。王年愷譯。臺北：貓頭鷹出版社
*珍．圖溫吉＆基斯．坎貝爾 2014《自戀時代》。吳緯疆譯。臺北：八旗出版社。
Scitovsky, Tibor 2009《無快樂的經濟》。高永平譯。北京：中國人民大學《童年的消逝》
本田透 2007《電波男》。臺北：尖端出版社。
雪莉特克 2017《在一起孤獨》。洪世民譯。臺北：時報文化出版社
亞當奧特 2017《欲罷不能》。廖建容譯。臺北：天下文化出版社
伊恩萊斯理 2017《重拾好奇心》。林威利譯。臺北：新樂園出版社
Higashino Keigo 2006 "Dedication of Suspect X". Liu Ziqian translated. Taipei: Culture.
Qiang Langsen's 2016 "Public Audit of the Villagers". Dai to Chinese translation. Taipei: Shangzhou Press
Yoseph Pipper 2009 "Leisure". Translated by Liu Senyao. Taipei: Lixu Publishing House.
Mann, Sandi 2017 "Boring Value". Translated by Lin Limin. Taipei: Three Cai Culture.
Nilpzmann 1994 "The Passing of Childhood". Translated by Xiao Zhaojun. Taipei: Yuanliu Press
Carr, nicholas 2012 "The Internet makes us stupid". Translated by Wang Niankai. Taipei: Owl Publishing House
*Zhen. Tuwenji & Kis. Campbell 2014 "narcissism". Translated by Wu Wejiang. Taipei: Eight Banner Publishing House.
Scitovsky, Tibor 2009 "Unhappy Economy". Translated by Gao Yongping. Beijing: Renmin University of China "The Passing of Childhood"
Honda Tomo 2007 "Radio Man". Taipei: Speed Press.
Shirletek 2017 "Lonely together." Translated by Hong Shimin. Taipei: Times Culture Press
Adam Out 2017 "Can't Stop". Liao Jianrong translated. Taipei: World Cultural Press
Ianleto's 2017 "Regaining Curiosity". Translated by Lin Willie. Taipei: New Paradise Press
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂報告課堂報告 Class report |
45 | 報告有兩種，一是閱讀指定教材然後進行課堂報告，由於課堂報告只四至五次左右，所以，未參加課堂報告的同學，須於期末時進行期末報告。 |
| 分組討論分組討論 Discussion |
30 | 課堂進行會有討論題目，需要繳交討論結果。 |
| 期末作業期末作業 Final operation |
25 | 由老師出題，於期末考當週完成繳交。 |
