「國家民族的命運全部隱藏於國民性當中」這一類托克維爾式的歷史社會學修辭, 雖然無法實證，但是，諸如日本社會在常識上被認為具有集體性的傾向、重視對權威的服從等論述, 我們卻也難以反對。另外，日裔的美國歷史社會學者法蘭西斯？福山也這樣說：「在日本, 長期存在著長子優位繼承的慣行, 只有長子可能繼承家業, 所以次子以下的男子, 自幼即有離『家』自謀生計的準備。同時, 這使得日本人對於血緣關係較不執著, 但是對於『家』的存續非常重視。此一社會文化傾向, 造成日本人對於引進無血緣關係之人繼承家業並無太大抵抗」。所以, 就法社會學的觀點而言, 在日本的社會文化中, 個人可以說幾乎完全依附於組織當中。而組織與組織之間橫向聯繫能力的薄弱，以及個人所屬集團的單一化，使得個人在組織間移動極？困難。但從結果看來，這樣的行動模式，強化了日本人對組織的忠誠心，使得日本成？注重組織？「縱向人際關係」的社會。而這種社會形態的構成，不只基於個人的自制與道德感，當然也來自利己主義的驅策。就此一意義而言，日本的首相很難成？強人, 日本社會似乎也不期待強人首相的出現。這與同屬東亞民主國家的台灣和韓國，在近年來的民主化過程中所描繪的政治軌跡非常地不同。
另一方面，戰後日本政治學界對於政治過程主導權的所在, 卻非常感興趣，並且展開了長期且活潑的論爭。以東大法學部教授？清明為代表的「官僚主導論」，原為主流，但在1981年後, 京大法學部的村松歧夫以實證研究提出「政黨主導論」,展開對「官僚主導論」的質疑與挑戰。然而， 無論是？的「官僚主導論」或者是村松的「政黨主導論」，甚至內包在「政黨主導論」中的派閥政治、族議員政治等代表「議員主導」的政策形成論, 事實上強調的都是「組織型」的統治而非「個人型」的統治。亦即, 個人主導型政治或特定政治人物在政治過程中的功能, 在日本向來不被重視。這與東亞其他民主國家在近代化過程及現代政治的運作中，政治領袖在政治過程中，經常被凸顯的「人治」色彩相比的話，毫無疑問地，充分顯現日本政治的特異性。本課程將嘗試以[日本人與組織]、[日本型能力主義]、[終身雇用制與日本文化]、[組織社會中個人的探求]等議題，帶領同學們接近日本社會構造的核心。"The fate of the national nation is all hidden in the nationality." This type of Tocoville -style historian rhetoric is that although it cannot be empirical, such as Japanese society is considered a collective tendency in common sense, paid attention to obedience to authority, etc. Discuss, we are also difficult to oppose. In addition, Francis, an American historians of the American American? Fukuyama also said: "In Japan, there is a long -term accustomed to the eldest son's advantages inheritance. Only the eldest son may inherit the family business. People are less attached to blood relationships, but they attach great importance to the survival of "home". Therefore, in terms of the point of view of sociology, in Japan's social and cultural, individuals can say that they are almost fully attached to the organization. And the weakness of horizontal connection between organization and organization, and the single of the individual group, make individuals move between organizations? difficulty. But from the results, such an action model has strengthened the Japanese's loyalty to the organization and made Japan become? Pay attention to the organization? Society of "vertical interpersonal relationships". The composition of this social form is not only based on individual self -control and morality, but of course, it also comes from the drive of self -interest. In this sense, is it difficult for the Prime Minister of Japan to achieve it? Strong people, Japanese society does not seem to look forward to the appearance of the Prime Minister of the strong man. This is very different from Taiwan and South Korea, which belong to East Asian democratic countries, and the political trajectory depicted in the process of democratization in recent years.
On the other hand, the post -war Japanese political community was very interested in the dominance of the political process and launched long -term and lively disputes. Professor of the Ministry of France of Dongda University? The "bureaucratic dominance theory" represented by Qingming was originally the mainstream. However, after 1981, the Ministry of France's Ministry of France's Murakama Musaku proposed "the theory of political party leadership" with empirical research, and launched questioning and challenges of "bureaucratic dominance theory". However, no matter what? The "bureaucratic dominance theory" or the "party -led theory" of Murashiro, and even the policy formation theory of "Leading Leading" by the factional politics and clan politics in the "party -led theory". The rule of "organizational type" rather than the "personal type" rule. That is, the function of personal leading politics or specific politicians in the political process has never been valued in Japan. This is compared with other democratic countries in East Asia in the process of modernization and modern politics. In the process of political leaders, the color of "human governance" is often highlighted, and there is no doubt that it fully shows the specificity of Japanese politics. This course will try topics such as [Japanese and Organization], [Japanese Capacity], [Lifetime Employment System and Japanese Culture], [Organizing Personal Exploration in Society] and other issues to lead students to the core of the construction of Japanese society.
1，F.Fukuyama,Trust,1995.(中譯《信任》，立緒文化、2001）。
2，山本七平『日本人とユダヤ人』，2004（初版1970）。（中譯《日本人與猶太人》，錦繡出版事業，1994）。
1. F.fukuyama, Trust, 1995. (Chinese translation "Trust", Lixu Culture, 2001).
2. Yamamoto Qiping "Japanese", 2004 (first edition 1970). (Chinese translation "Japanese and Jews", brilliant publishing, 1994).
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平時分數平時分數 Usual score |
40 | 上課表現，發問，回答問題，作業等綜合評價 |
| 期中考試期中考試 Mid -term exam |
30 | 書面報告，分組討論 |
| 期末考試期末考試 Final exam |
30 | 研究報告，分組討論，口試 |
