Home
行政管理暨政策學系
course information of 106 - 2 | 2087 Administrative Ethics(行政倫理)

Taught In English2087 - 行政倫理 Administrative Ethics


教育目標 Course Target

行政人員等公共管理者,不僅影響政治體系的運作與重要議題的排序,無疑是在政府行政運作與公共政策過程中扮演著關鍵性的角色,而成為「行政國守衛者」(the guardians of the administrative state)。然而,如同英國公爵Lord Acton (1887)所指陳之「權力導致腐敗,絕對的權力導致絕對的腐敗」,行政人員在代行行政權力、運用與分配公共資源與提供公共服務之際,是否善盡其管理職責、規劃社會利益和社會負擔的合理分配、有效回應社會價值偏好與人民信任,而體現行政的公共性,成為全球公共治理的重要議題。 也因此,如同古希臘哲人Aristotle「誰來監督護國衛士?」(Who guards the guardians)的疑問,行政部門需要採取哪些措施?如何建立或改革哪些內在、外在控制的機制?這些都不是憑空所能形成,也非輕易即能維持下去,而有賴於公共參與、法律制度規範、整合的組織結構與相關政策的落實,方能建立杜絕貪腐與濫權的廉能政府。 本門課程的目標,即在於協助同學認識與討論公共行政所面對之多元價值的分歧與衝突,進而討論行政倫理的意涵、不同層次的倫理範疇、對公共行政行為的影響與制約作用,以及如何規範與組織制度相聯繫的倫理原則和行為準則,期能促使同學進一步深入理解、自覺與培養對行政倫理的信念。 Public administrators such as administrative personnel not only influence the political system's operations and the ranking of important issues, but undoubtedly play a key role in the government's administrative operations and public policy, and become the "guardians of the administrative state". However, as the Duke of the United Kingdom Lord Acton (1887) pointed out by Chen's "power causes corruption, absolute power causes corruption", whether administrative personnel perform administrative power, use and distribute public resources and provide public services, whether they are good at distributing their management responsibilities, planning the rational distribution of social interests and social burdens, and effectively responding to social value preferences and people's trust, while the public nature of administration has become an important topic in global public governance. Therefore, just like the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, "Who comes to supervise the guardians?" (Who guards the guardians), what measures do the administrative department need to take? How to establish or reform what internal and external control mechanisms are there? These are not formed by emptiness, nor can they be maintained easily. Only by implementing public participation, legal system regulations, integrated organizational structures and related policies can we establish an honest and capable government that will eliminate corruption and corruption. The goal of this course is to help students understand and discuss the differences and conflicts in the diverse values ​​faced by public administration, and then discuss the implications of administrative ethics, the scope of ethics at different levels, the impact and conventional role on public administration, and how to formulate ethics principles and behavioral standards related to the organizational system, hoping to encourage students to further understand, perceive and cultivate their belief in administrative ethics.


參考書目 Reference Books

余致力(編),2011,《廉政與治理》。北市:智勝。
許立一,2003,〈黑堡宣言產生的系絡及其與新公共行政的關係〉,《空大學訊》308:72-85。
許立一,2003,〈新公共行政的再現與新詮-黑堡宣言的主張(上、下)〉,《空大學訊》312:121-126、《空大學訊》313:87-94。
許立一,2003,《慎思熟慮的民主行政》。北市:韋伯。
許立一、張世杰,2011,《公務倫理》。新北市:國立空中大學。
陳敦源 、蔡秀涓,2006,〈國家發展的倫理基礎:反貪腐與公職人員倫理準則〉,《臺灣民主季刊》3(3):185-200。
施能傑,2004,〈公共服務倫理的理論架構規範作法〉,‎《政治科學論叢》20:103-140。
葉尉鑫,2006,〈行政倫理與行政裁量對公務人員重要性之初探〉,《T & D 飛訊》52:1-12。
黃朝盟、陳坤發,2009,〈公務人員的行政倫理觀:台灣縣市政府行政菁英意見調查分析〉,《政治科學論叢》16:119-136。
詹靜芬,2010,〈基層文官的倫理困境:依法行政下的難題〉,《T & D 飛訊》96:1-20。
蔡明華,2011,〈公務人員人格發展與公共服務〉,《文官制度季刊》3(1) :93-115。
蔡秀娟,2011,〈行政院組織改造對公務人員角色之改變與意義公務人員角色〉,《T & D飛訊》130。
蔡秀涓、陳敦源,2013,〈實踐公務員倫理法制的範圍與方法:國際趨勢與臺灣現況〉,《文官制度季刊》5(4):1-48。
關中,2010,〈行政倫理的重要議題:從保護弊端揭發者談起〉,「公益揭發(揭弊)保護學術與實務研討會」。盧建旭,2009,〈公務倫理:整合公共治理的概念〉,《文官制度季刊》考試院八十周年慶特刊:39-53。
許濱松、余致力、金士先、吳秦雯,2011,〈公務員利益迴避〉,《廉政與治理》第4章(智勝)。
蕭武桐,2002,《公務倫理》。北市:智勝。
法務部,2004,〈美國檢核長及政府倫理局制度考察報告〉。取自法務部http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128187&ctNode=28061&mp=001。
法務部,2008,〈日本「國家公務員倫理法」〉與〈日本「國家公務員倫理規程」〉。取自法務部http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128006&ctNode=28061&mp=001
法務部,2010,〈公務員廉政倫理規範〉。取自法務部http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=258544&ctNode=28058&mp=001
U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) (1999), Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, (行政機關公務員倫理行為標準手冊)取自法務部http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128187&ctNode=28061&mp=001
Cooper, Terry L. (2012). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Denhardt, J. V. and R. B. Denhardt, (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Denhardt, K. G. (1988). The Ethics of Public Service: Resolving Moral Dilemmas in Public Organizations. Westport, CO: Greenwood Press, Inc.
Geuras, Dean and Charles Garofalo (2010). Practical Ethics in Public Administration (3rd ed.). Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.

Yu Dili (editor), 2011, "Integrity and Governance". Taipei City: Wisdom.
Xu Liyi, 2003, "The Systems Generated by the Black Castle Declaration and Its Relationship with New Public Administration", "Sky University News" 308: 72-85.
Xu Liyi, 2003, "Resurrection of New Public Administration and the New Explanation - The Prophet of the Black Castle Declaration (Part 1 and 2)", "Sky University News" 312:121-126, "Sky University News" 313:87-94.
Xu Liyi, 2003, "Democratic Administration with Careful Thoughts". Taipei City: Wei Bo.
Xu Liyi, Zhang Shijie, 2011, "Communication Ethics". New Taipei City: National Aerial University.
Chen Dunyuan, Cai Xiujuan, 2006, "The Ethical Foundation of National Development: Anti-corruption and Public Employee Ethical Guidelines", Taiwan Democracy Quarterly 3(3): 185-200.
《Theoretical Structure Methods of Public Service Ethics》《Political Science Forum》 20:103-140.
Ye Weixin, 2006, "A preliminary study on the importance of administrative ethics and administrative discretion to public personnel", "T & D Flying News" 52:1-12.
Huang Chao League, Chen Kunfa, 2009, "Administrative Ethics of Public Affairs: Survey and Analysis of Opinions of Administrative Elites in Taiwan County Municipal Government", "Political Science Forum" 16:119-136.
Zhan Jingfen, 2010, "The Ethical Dilemma of Basic Civilians: The Difficulties under Administration according to Law", "T & D Flying News" 96:1-20.
Cai Minghua, 2011, "Personal Development and Public Services of Public Services", "Civil Affairs System Quarterly" 3(1): 93-115.
Cai Xiujuan, 2011, "The Change of the Role of Public Officials in the Executive Yuan Organization and the Role of Public Officials in the Role of Public Officials in the Executive Yuan, T & D Flying News 130.
Cai Xiujuan, Chen Dunyuan, 2013, "The scope and method of the legal system of ethics and laws of the Industrial Public Affairs: International Trends and Taiwan Current Situation", "Civil Affairs System Quarterly" 5(4): 1-48.
In 2010, "Important Questions of Administrative Ethics: Discussion from the Exploitors of Protection", "Public Welfare Exposure (Expose Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting (Exposing Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Exploiting Lu Jianxu, 2009, "Public Ethics: The Concept of Integrating Public Governance", Special Issue for the 80th Anniversary of the Examination Institute of Civil Affairs Quarterly: 39-53.
Xu Binsong, Yu Chili, Jin Shixian, Wu Qinwen, 2011, "Avoiding the interests of public servants", "Integrity and Governance" Chapter 4 (Smart).
Wu Tong, 2002, "Communication Ethics". Taipei City: Wisdom.
Department of Law, 2004, "Report on the Inspection of the U.S. Applicant and the Bureau of Governmental Ethics System". Retrieved from the Department of Law http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128187&ctNode=28061&mp=001.
Ministry of Law, 2008, "Japan's "National Public Service Ethics Law" and "Japan's "National Public Service Ethics Law". Retrieved from the Department of Law http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128006&ctNode=28061&mp=001
Ministry of Law, 2010, "Regulations on Integrity of Public Officials". Retrieved from the Department of Law http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=258544&ctNode=28058&mp=001
U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) (1999), Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, (Administrative Office Ethical Behavior Standard Manual) is taken from the Department of Law http://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=128187&ctNode=28061&mp=001
Cooper, Terry L. (2012). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Denhardt, J. V. and R. B. Denhardt, (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, not Steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Denhardt, K. G. (1988). The Ethics of Public Service: Resolving Moral Dilemmas in Public Organizations. Westport, CO: Greenwood Press, Inc.
Geuras, Dean and Charles Garofalo (2010). Practical Ethics in Public Administration (3rd ed.). Vienna, VA: Management Concepts.


評分方式 Grading

評分項目 Grading Method 配分比例 Grading percentage 說明 Description
出席上課、發問、參與討論與臨時課堂測驗出席上課、發問、參與討論與臨時課堂測驗
Attend classes, ask, participate in discussions and temporary classes
40
期中報告期中報告
Midterm Report
30
期末測驗期末測驗
Final test
30

授課大綱 Course Plan

Click here to open the course plan. Course Plan
交換生/外籍生選課登記 - 請點選下方按鈕加入登記清單,再等候任課教師審核。
Add this class to your wishlist by click the button below.
請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first


相似課程 Related Course

很抱歉,沒有符合條件的課程。 Sorry , no courses found.

Course Information

Description

學分 Credit:0-3
上課時間 Course Time:Thursday/2,3,4[SS206]
授課教師 Teacher:蔡偉銑
修課班級 Class:行政系3
選課備註 Memo:
This Course is taught In English 授課大綱 Course Plan: Open

選課狀態 Attendance

There're now 62 person in the class.
目前選課人數為 62 人。

請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first