我國公民對於是否應由自己參與審判少發議論，社會卻對司法時有批判，此情此景，並不陌生。因此讓公民立於與法官相同之角度，參與刑事審判，踐行正當法律程序，同求國人對司法之瞭解及信賴，至屬必要。研究國民參與司法制度實踐，配套解決實施國民參與審判制度之問題，乃是本課程之目標。期使同學在分析思考的過程理解公民參與刑事審判制度的重要議題與刑事訴訟法之應合。透過課程研討，從公民參與刑事審判的功能目的分析制度建置之必要性與意義，配合刑事訴訟程序法原理原則深入分析刑事訴訟制度實踐問題。鼓勵同學思考實務問題，深入分析，報告研究心得，
■課程目標
一、從比較法制研究重省刑事訴訟法之法理原則
1.陪審制 參審制 併立制 日本裁判員制度
2.參與內涵部分 評議量刑 上訴制度與上訴審查問題
■課程內涵
司法制度的終極目的在實現社會的公平與正義，審判使命在於公平、迅速且正確的解決紛爭。我國刑事審判法制應採行陪審、參審制或另規畫其他公民參與刑事審判法制態樣，乃是課程研討基礎，課程從比較法觀點，就六項主要課題進行討論：
第一，關於國民參與司法的必要性問題。回歸主權在民，法治觀念的植根以及提昇對司法的信任，呼應刑事訴訟法原則，職是，一則為強化裁判之信度效度，二為求落實司法民主化之理念，研議我國是否採行國民參與刑事審判，實屬核心議題。
第二，有關憲法爭議問題，引進國民參與司法審判是否牴觸憲法第八十一條所定法官獨立審判之精神。憲法規定並非排斥國民作為審判主體參與司法？不修憲，逕行引進國民參與司法制度是否有違憲之疑。
第三，與刑事訴訟構造的關係。引進國民參與刑事審判，與訴訟構造如何設計，宜深入討論。就外國法例之比較法研究而言，美國的陪審並非是唯一理想的參與制度，而歐陸各國推行參審，其實也各具特色，是故歐陸參審制實踐狀況如何，訴訟程序配套亦為課程研討重點之一。
第四，倘若將來採行由職業法官與國民組成合議審理之方式，即參審制度者，應確保國民參與司法的主體性及實質的參與。以兩者之比例關係應如何設計？再者，就實質的參與而言，審判程序中，參審員的權利，不論調查證據抑或判決量刑等，公民與法官應同享有對等的相同的權限，其意義安在，優缺點如何。
第五，關於適用國民參與刑事審判的案件範圍，影響制度存續與安定，如何決定優先適用範圍，也須配合現行實務問題共同檢討。
第六 公民參與刑事審判與上訴問題Our citizens are not unfamiliar with the situation of whether they should participate in the trial and discuss the issue. Therefore, it is necessary for citizens to stand in the same perspective as judges, participate in criminal trials, conduct formal legal procedures, and seek nationals' understanding and trust in the judiciary. The goal of this course is to study the implementation of the national participation and judicial system and solve the problems of implementing the national participation and judicial system in a supporting manner. In order to enable students to understand the important issues of citizen participation in the criminal trial system and the criminal complaint law in the process of analytical thinking. Through course discussion, we analyze the necessity and meaning of system establishment from the functional purpose of citizen participation and criminal trials, and cooperate with the principles and principles of criminal procedural law to deeply analyze the actual problems of the criminal procedural system. Encourage students to think about practical problems, conduct in-depth analysis, and report research experience.
■ Course Target
1. Study the legal principles of criminal complaint law in major provinces from a comparative legal system
1.Accompany system,Accompany system,Japan system,Japan system
2. Participate in the connotation part, comment on sentencing, appeal system and appeal review questions
■ Course content
The ultimate goal of the judicial system is to realize social fairness and justice, and the mission of judgment lies in a fair, rapid and correct solution. Our country's criminal trial legal system should adopt a review, an interview system or other citizens' participation in a criminal trial legal system. This is the basis for course research. The course discusses six main subjects from comparing legal perspectives:
First, the issue of the necessity of national participation in justice. Recalling the root of the rule of law concept and promoting trust in the judiciary, we call the principle of criminal complaint law, which is to strengthen the credibility and validity of judgments, and to seek to implement the concept of judicial democratization, and to discuss whether our country should adopt the implementation of national participation in criminal trials, which is the core issue.
Second, there are issues regarding legal disputes, which leads to whether the participation of the nationals in judicial review in violation of the spirit of independent judges stipulated in Article 81 of the Law. Does the Regulations of the Condolence Law exclude citizens from participating in the judicial system as the subject of trial? If you do not revise your worries, you will doubt whether the civilians will participate in the judicial system.
Third, relationship with criminal acts. In-depth discussions should be made on how to introduce nationals to participate in criminal trials and design dispute structures. As for the study of comparative laws of foreign laws, the US apprenticeship is not the only ideal apprenticeship system. However, the European countries have their own characteristics in promoting apprenticeship. Therefore, the European apprenticeship review is also one of the key points of the course discussion.
Fourth, if the method of reviewing a joint review between a professional judge and a national group is adopted, that is, the review system should ensure the subjectivity and quality of participation of the national and judicial participation. How should we design the ratio between the two? Furthermore, in terms of actual participation, in the trial process, the rights of the examinee are, regardless of whether the evidence is investigated or sentencing is sentenced, etc., citizens and judges should share the same rights, and their meaning is in the way of giving or not.
Fifth, the scope of cases where applicable national participation and criminal trials affects the survival and stability of the system. How to determine the scope of priority and application must also be jointly reviewed in accordance with the actual practice issues.
Sixth Citizen Participation in Criminal Trial and Prosecution Problems
■ 主要參考書籍/資料(Textbooks and References)(教科書遵守智慧財產權觀念不得非法影印)
課堂講義（於第一節課程說明，並隨課程進度提供參考資料）
請先行研讀以下三文獻
陳運財，國民參與刑事審判之研究—兼評日本裁判員制度，月旦法學雜誌，第180 期，2010 年5 月。
陳運財，論日本刑事司法制度之改革研究報告，東海法學，第20 期，2004年 6 月。
John D. Jackson and Nikolay P. Kovalev, Lay Adjudication and Human Rights in
Europe, 13 Colum. J. Eur. L. 83 (2006-2007).
其他參考資料
葛野尋之*（著）林裕順**、陳依農***（譯）裁判員制度下民主主義與自由主義之體現
——以日本最高法院之裁判員制度合憲判決為出發，國立中正大學法學集刊，2014年5月
陳運財，刑事訴訟制度之改革及其課題，月旦法學雜誌，第100 期，2003 年9 月。
陳運財，何賴傑，李佳玟，人民觀審制之理論與實踐，台灣法學雜誌，第193期，2012 年2 月。
陳運財，論國民參與刑事審判與上訴制度之變革，月旦法學雜誌，2013年4月
何賴傑，從德國參審制談司法院人民觀審制，臺大法學論叢，第41 卷，2012年11 月。
DEATH PENALTY SENTENCING IN JAPAN UNDER THE LAY ASSESSOR SYSTEM: AVOIDING THE AVOIDABLE THROUGH UNANIMITY
Elizabeth M. Sher
PACIFIC RIM LAW & POLICY JOURNAL V OL. 20 NO. 3
■ Main reference books/references (Textbooks and References) (Textbooks and References are not illegally photocopying)
Class lectures (explained in the first session and provided reference information according to the course progress)
Please study the following trinkets first
Chen Qianjia, Research on Criminal Examinations—and Review of Japanese Judgment System, Yuedan Law Journal, No. 180, May 2010.
Chen Qiang, Research Report on the Reform of Japan's Criminal Justice System, Donghai Law School, No. 20, June 2004.
John D. Jackson and Nikolay P. Kovalev, Lay Adjudication and Human Rights in
Europe, 13 Colum. J. Eur. L. 83 (2006-2007).
Other reference materials
Ge Ye's * (written by Lin Yutong ** and Chen Yiyuan*** (translation) The presentation of democratic and liberalism under the referee system
——Developed by the joint judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan, the National Chung-Chung University Law Journal, May 2014
Chen Qian, Reform of the Criminal Dispute System and Its Course, Yuedan Law Journal, No. 100, September 2003.
Chen Qiang, He Qiangjie, Li Jiawen, Theory and Practice of People's Appreciation, Taiwan Law Journal, Issue 193, February 2012.
Chen Qianfen, discussing the changes in the civil participation and criminal trials and the appeal system, Yuedan Law Journal, April 2013
He Xujie, from Germany to discuss the People's Views of the Judicial Court, Taiwan Law Forum, Vol. 41, November 2012.
DEATH PENALTY SENTENCING IN JAPAN UNDER THE LAY ASSESSOR SYSTEM: AVOIDING THE AVOIDABLE THROUGH UNANIMITY
Elizabeth M. Sher
PACIFIC RIM LAW & POLICY JOURNAL V OL. 20 NO. 3
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|
