民主政治有許多不同的類型，有複決民主(referendum democracy)，有代議民主(representative democracy)，有多數民主(majoritarian democracy)，有共識民主(consensus democracy)，有憲政民主(constitutional democracy)，有審議民主(deliberative democracy)。然而，不論何種類型的民主，都必須以民選的議會為基礎來運作，議會（立法機關）必然是民主政府權力的中心。在民主政治下，法律必須由民選的議會所制定，議會藉由法律的制定，為整個社會做權威性的價值分配，因此民主政治的統治必須以贏得議會的多數支持為前提。本課程旨在介紹議會民主相關的爭議，以及其與其他民主類型的關係，以期學生具備相關的政治知識，分析判斷與公共服務的能力。There are many different types of democratic politics, including referendum democracy, representative democracy, major democracy, consensus democracy, constitutional democracy, and deliberative democracy. However, no matter what type of democracy, it must operate based on the elected congress, and the congress (legislative agency) must be the center of the power of a democratic government. In democratic politics, the law must be formulated by the people's elected congress. The congress uses the law to make the authoritative value distribution for the entire society. Therefore, the rule of democratic politics must be based on the majority support of the congress. This course aims to introduce the disputes about democracy and their relationship with other democratic types, in order to provide students with relevant political knowledge and analytical and discriminatory abilities and public services.
(1) Clucas, Richard A. and Melody Ellis Valdini. 2015. The Character of Democracy: How Institutions Shape Politics. New York: Oxford University.
(2) Hazan, Reuven Y. ed. 2011. Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. New York: Routledge.
(3) Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
(4) Qvortrup, Matt. 2013. Direct Democracy: A comparative study of the theory and practice of government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
(5) Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(6) Smith, William. 2013. Civil disobedience and deliberative democracy. New York : Routledge.
(7) 任冀平（2014），＜司法審查存立的制度性基礎＞，（全球政治評論）第48期，頁27~62。
(8) 任冀平（2011），＜法院與政治：美國司法政治初探＞，（全球政治評論）第33期，頁73~95。
(9) 沈有忠（2012），＜通往議會制之路─德國國會的憲政定位與政黨政治＞，（臺灣民主季刊）第9卷第2期，頁39~69。
(10) 廖達琪、陳月卿、李承訓（2013），＜半總統制下的國會監督－從法制面比較台灣與法國國會的監督能量＞，（問題與研究）第52卷第2期，頁51~97。
(11) 彭錦鵬（2001），＜從歐美經驗論國會議員人數及「立委席次減半」＞，（政治科學論叢）第15期，頁171~190。
(12) 黃秀端（2003），＜少數政府在國會的困境＞，（台灣政治學刊）第七卷第二 期，頁3-49。
(13) 盛杏湲（2006），＜臺灣民眾為什麼討厭立法院？＞，（台灣民主季刊）第3卷第3期，頁85~128。
(14) 蘇子喬、王業立（2012），＜總統與國會選制影響政黨體系的跨國分析＞，（問題與研究）第51卷4期，頁35~70。
(15) 蘇子喬（2010），＜憲政體制與選舉制度的配套思考＞，（政治科學論叢）第44期，頁35~74。
(16) 蕭怡靖（2005），＜我國立法院資深制度之探討—委員會遊走及召集委員深制度之變遷＞，（政治科學論叢）第25期，頁105~134。
(1) Clucas, Richard A. and Melody Ellis Valdini. 2015. The Character of Democracy: How Institutions Shape Politics. New York: Oxford University.
(2) Hazan, Reuven Y. ed. 2011. Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. New York: Routledge.
(3) Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
(4) Qvortrup, Matt. 2013. Direct Democracy: A comparative study of the theory and practice of government by the people. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
(5) Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis? Politics, Governance and Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
(6) Smith, William. 2013. Civil disobedience and deliberative democracy. New York : Routledge.
(7) Ren Jiping (2014),
(8) Ren Jiping (2011),
(9) Shen Youzhong (2012),
(10) Liao Daqi, Chen Yueqing, and Li Cheng (2013),
(11) Peng Wang (2001),
(12) Huang Xiuduan (2003),
(13) Sheng Xingshang (2006),
(15) Su Zi Qiao (2010),
(16) Qi Yijing (2005),
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|
