By employing the group project as a major learning strategy to activate independent, systematic thought and foresight, with a micro-implementation focus, this course provides a solid foundation and is expected to enable undergraduate students to:
(1)define the service problems or issues through needs assessment, data collection, data analysis, and data conclusions in relation to the societal conditions;
(2)employ group tactics in clarifying the service goals and making project decisions;
(3)respond to a need of seeking a development of recipe for self own method or a framework of project planning and evaluation; and,
(4)identify the pragmatic variables that influence project implementation, evaluation, and the exercise value.
課程內容涵蓋之單元有：
需求評估/問題陳述：描述案主需求或問題，及其存在之事實；
目的及工作目標：依據案主之需求或問題設定方案執行之目的與工作目標；
服務對象：描述方案所針對之服務案主群；
方案活動：描述方案所有之活動執行內容；
活動型態及活動性質：描述各服務活動之型態及性質；
方案所需資源：述明從籌備到評鑑，方案所需運用資源之項目與數量；
工作人員之角色-任務-責任：描述所有參與方案執行人員之分工狀況、角色、任務及職責；
經費編列：依據方案活動之所需，編列收入/支出之預算金額；
執行進度：標明各相關事項需得完成之日期、時間，以利掌控籌備工作進度；
方案宣傳：標明宣傳方案之對象、時間、地點、方法、預算、…等；
服務評鑑：形成評估、過程評鑑、結果評鑑擇一執行，以利確定服務之進行或成效為何。
By employing the group project as a major learning strategy to activate independent, systematic thought and foresight, with a micro-implementation focus, this course provides a solid foundation and is expected to enable undergraduate students to:
(1) define the service problems or issues through needs assessment, data collection, data analysis, and data conclusions in relation to the societyal conditions;
(2)employ group tactics in clarifying the service goals and making project decisions;
(3) respond to a need of seeking a development of recipe for self own method or a framework of project planning and evaluation; and,
(4)identify the pragmatic variables that influence project implementation, evaluation, and the exercise value.
The individual contents of the course include:
Requirement Assessment/Problem Declaration: Describe the client’s needs or problems, and their existing facts;
Purpose and work objectives: Set the purpose and work objectives of the implementation of the plan according to the needs or problems of the client;
Service object: describe the service client group for which the plan is designated;
Program activities: describe the execution content of all the program activities;
Activity type and activity properties: describe the types and properties of each service activity;
Resources required for the plan: describe the items and quantity of the resources required for the plan from preparation to evaluation;
The role of staff-mission-responsibilities: describes the division of labor conditions, roles, tasks and responsibilities of all participating personnel;
Fee editing: Edit the budget amount of income/expenditure according to the requirements of the programme activities;
Implementation progress: specify the date and time when each related matter needs to be completed, so as to control the progress of preparation work;
Program promotion: define the object, time, location, method, budget,…, etc. of the promotion plan;
Service evaluation: Formulate an evaluation, process evaluation, and result evaluation execution to facilitate the determination of the conduct or effectiveness of the service.
This course is designed to prepare undergraduate students to develop the knowledge, skills and strategies required for grantsmanship in relation to project planning, proposal writing, service effect evaluation and fund application at the practice operational level. The course not only demystifies the grant-writing process by providing a guide but exposes students to a variety of potential sources and approaches for program or project implementation.
This course is designed to prepare undergraduate students to develop the knowledge, skills and strategies required for grantsmanship in relation to project planning, proposal writing, service effect evaluation and foundation application at the practice operational level. The course not only demystifies the grant-writing process by providing a guide but exposes students to a variety of potential sources and approaches for program or project implementation.
(1)Coley, S. M., & Scheinberg, C. A. (2008). Proposal Writing: Effective
grantsmanship (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
（2）梁偉康（1997）。社會服務機構行政管理與實踐（一版四刷）。香港：集賢社。
（3）蔡啟源（2015）。方案規劃與評鑑。台北：雙葉。
（4） Handouts and relevant text materials as needed will be announced in the
class.
(1)Coley, S. M., & Scheinberg, C. A. (2008). Proposal Writing: Effective
grantsmanship (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
(2) Liang Weikang (1997). Social service institutions administrative management and practice (one version and four brushes). Hong Kong: Jiqian Club.
(3) Cai Qiyuan (2015). Plan planning and evaluation. Taipei: Double Leaf.
(4) Handouts and relevant text materials as needed will be announced in the
class.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-term examinationMid-term examination Mid-term examination |
15 | 期中考 |
| Final PresentationFinal Presentation Final Presentation |
25 | 期末學習成果總檢驗 |
| Group assignmentGroup assignment Group assignment |
40 | 平常學習與設計練習 |
| Class attendance & participationClass attendance & participation Class attendance & participation |
20 | 課堂參與、學習與體驗 |
