顧名思義，本課嘗試「翻轉」課堂參與者的思維、事情的認知。人活在日常裡，原來的認知來自於日常，逐漸形成習以為常（包括大學前教育：以考試為目的，養成習於將現象框入標準答案。這看似鼓勵發揮自我，卻因總以似是而非的解釋輪迴來描述事物，故實際上阻礙獨立思考）。習以為常、常識，甚至「知識」，有沒有問題？又如何重新建立認知？是否有重新認識世界的可能呢？今天的世界、台灣，究竟如何來到今天？有什麼意義呢？

為處理這些，課程內容將選取帶有歷史感的材料。但不同於「考試科目：歷史科」的作用，我們認為「歷史」不是過去的事，不是「與我無關」的事；反之，今天就是歷史後果，歷史就在我體內。既然為打開思辨、重整認知，就必需倚靠大量討論。我們倚靠常見的、正因常見所以容易為人忽視的故事、電影、記錄片，以討論來進行有脈絡的深描與重讀。除討論，仍有兩篇隨堂心得，目的是以書寫表達來讓參與者自我檢驗。總歸一句話：翻轉定義、重建思辯的可能路徑的同時，也嘗試重新理解「現實」，思索「歷史」與「今日」之關聯。

課程實際架構請參考環環相扣的各週主題、文本。包括殺人案、環境污染、白色恐怖、國際分工與壓迫、人的歧視、狹隘國族主義……等。這些材料，課堂參與者可能本來熟悉，也可能知道但沒看過，或者根本不知道。但，看到議題時，能不能不要立即以社會上常見的方式判對錯？能否不落入二分？課程目的不是創造另一個標準答案，而是拒絕填鴨式教育的「死背硬吞」、拒絕凡事「非此即彼」的二元認知，培養穿透事物表面因果的能力以跨越思考的誤區。我們需要修課者盡力尋找自己無法解答的部份，震盪自己的思想，但最終目標仍在於回到生活周遭、使知識有用，自我反省、反省人際及各種關係。

在沒有系所資源支持的艱困處境下，以教育部默許「公、私立學校薪資脫鉤」的不到六百元時薪開課，但良心事業可受公評。舉例而言，修課者可能覺得不喜歡作業，殊不知課後改作業等同無薪工作。由於教師不惜血本、勞力與情緒勞力，有怨無悔，故也將要求嚴格，請特別留心無誠勿試。（2016/12/30）

As the name suggests, this class attempts to "flip" the thinking and perception of classroom participants. People live in daily life, and their original cognition comes from daily life, and gradually forms habits (including pre-college education: for the purpose of examination, you develop the habit of framing phenomena into standard answers. This may seem to encourage self-expression, but because things are always described with specious explanations, it actually hinders independent thinking). Is there anything wrong with common sense, common sense, or even “knowledge”? How to re-establish cognition? Is it possible to re-understand the world? How did today's world and Taiwan come to be where they are today? What's the point?

To address these, course content will draw on material with a historical feel. But different from the role of "examination subject: history", we believe that "history" is not a thing in the past or something that "has nothing to do with me"; on the contrary, today is the consequences of history, and history is in my body. Since in order to open up speculation and reorganize cognition, it is necessary to rely on a lot of discussion. We rely on common stories, movies, and documentaries that are easily overlooked because of their commonness, and use discussions to conduct contextual in-depth descriptions and re-readings. In addition to the discussion, there are also two essays on lessons learned, which are designed to allow participants to examine themselves through written expression. In a word: while reversing definitions and reconstructing possible paths of speculation, we also try to re-understand "reality" and think about the relationship between "history" and "today".

For the actual structure of the course, please refer to the interlocking themes and texts of each week. Including homicides, environmental pollution, white terror, international division of labor and oppression, human discrimination, narrow nationalism, etc. Class participants may be familiar with these materials, they may know them but have not seen them, or they may not know them at all. However, when you see an issue, can you not immediately judge what is right or wrong in the way that is common in society? Is it possible not to fall into two points? The purpose of the course is not to create another standard answer, but to reject the "rote learning" of cramming education, reject the binary perception of "either/or" in everything, and cultivate the ability to penetrate the superficial cause and effect of things to overcome misunderstandings in thinking. We need course participants to try their best to find the parts they cannot answer and shake their minds, but the ultimate goal is to return to the world around them, make the knowledge useful, reflect on themselves, and reflect on interpersonal and various relationships.

In a difficult situation without the support of departmental resources, classes are started with an hourly salary of less than 600 yuan, which is the Ministry of Education's tacit approval of the "decoupling of public and private school salaries", but the cause of conscience can be publicly criticized. For example, course takers may feel they don’t like the homework, but they don’t realize that correcting homework after class is equivalent to unpaid work. Since teachers do not hesitate to spend money, labor and emotional labor, and have no complaints or regrets, the requirements will also be strict. Please be particularly careful and do not try without sincerity. (2016/12/30)

詳各周

Details for each week