自2015年至今，臺中市已經舉辦了兩次「參與式預算」，陸續在中區、清水、豐原、大里等四個行政區範圍內執行。參與式預算起源於巴西愉港，是審議民主常見的公民參與模式之一。自1980年代中期以來，政治理論對於民主的思考，已逐漸由過去「選舉為中心」的投票民主，轉向以「討論為中心」的審議式民主，主張公民才是民主體制的參與主體，所有受決策影響的公民或其代表，都應該要能夠透過知情、理性、平等的溝通後參與集體決定。本課程將並重理論與實務，從臺中市參與式預算出發，介紹國內外參與式預算發展概況。
修課後對國內外參與式預算的實踐與審議民主具有務實的理解，並增加社會學想像與社會學分析運用的實作能力。尤其期望透過對臺中市參與式預算推動計畫的近距離觀察與批判性認識，能進一步融會貫通國內外參與式預算各案例，從更寬廣的理論與實作視角審視不同形式「審議民主」的可能性與限制。
課程前半著重了解審議民主精神與參與式預算發展歷史，並利用課堂研究分析報告與討論、田野調查分享等方式，充實社會學想像與參與式預算實作的能力。
課程後半展開實作訓練，進行校外參訪、接觸在地社群等社會實踐，並利用課堂規劃報告與討論、撰寫田野心得等方式，具體練習社會學實作的能力。
Since 2015, Taichung City has held two "participation budgets" and has been implemented in four administrative areas including Zhong District, Qingshui, Fengyuan and Dali. Participation-style budgeting originated in Yugang, Brazil and is one of the common citizen participation models for appraisal of democracy. Since the mid-1980s, political theory’s thinking on democracy has gradually shifted from the “selected as the center” voting democracy in the past to the “discussion-centered” appraisal democracy. The provocative citizens are the subject of the democratic system. All citizens or their representatives affected by the decision should be able to participate in collective decisions through informed, rational and equal communication. This course will focus on theoretical discussion and practice, and will be developed from Taichung City's participating budgets, introducing the development of domestic and foreign participating budgets.
After the course, we will have a practical understanding of the practical and review democracy of domestic and foreign participating budgets, and will increase the practical ability of social imagination and social analysis. In particular, we hope that through close observation and critical understanding of the Taiwan-China market participation budget promotion plan, we can further integrate the cases of domestic and foreign participation budgets, and examine the possibilities and limitations of different forms of "approval democracy" from a broader theoretical and practical perspective.
The first half of the course focuses on understanding the history of the development of democratic spirit and participation-based budgeting, and uses classroom research and analysis reports and discussions, field surveys and sharing to fulfill the ability of social imagination and participation-based budgeting.
The second half of the course is conducted to conduct off-campus visits, contact local communities and other social practices, and to use classroom planning reports and discussions, writing field experiences and other methods to specifically practice social practice skills.
1. 鄭麗君編，2015，《參與式預算：咱的預算 咱來決定》，臺北：財團法人青平台基金會。
2. John Gastil、Peter Levine著，劉介修、陳逸玲譯，2012，《審議民主指南：21世紀公民參與的有效策略》，臺北：群學。
3. Baiocchi, G. & Lerner, J. (2007). Could Participatory Budgeting Work in the United States?The Good Society 16(1), 8-13. Penn State University Press. Retrieved November 9, 2016, from Project MUSE database.
4. Ganuza, Ernesto and Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2012) "The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe," Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 8. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art8
5. Su, Celina (2012) "Whose Budget? Our Budget? Broadening Political Stakeholdership via Participatory Budgeting," Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 1. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art1
6. 萬毓澤，2016，〈台灣推動「參與式預算」的反省與前瞻〉，https://goo.gl/Ux8tRc
7. 林國明，2013，〈多元的公民審議如何可能？—程序主義與公民社會觀點〉，《臺灣民主季刊》第十卷第四期：137-83。
8. 洪德仁、潘蓬彬、楊志彬，2004，〈審議式民主在台灣―以北投社區「社造協定公民會議」經驗為例〉
9. 林子倫，2008，〈審議民主在社區：台灣地區的經驗〉
10. 謝宗學，2003，〈網際民主與審議民主之實踐：資訊化社會的桃花源村〉
11. 施聖文，2016，《臺中市參與式預算推動計畫成果報告書》
12. 臺中市參與式預算推動計畫辦公室，2016，《臺中市參與式預算審議主持人培訓手冊》
13. 參與式預算的全球之旅：反思深化民主、實踐社會正義如何可能（上）（下），http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37429，http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37475
14. 民主想像不設限：參與式預算和它的堂兄弟姊妹（上）（下），http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37989，http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/38157
15. 向加拿大取經：從多倫多社區住宅參與式預算反思「城市權」的實踐（上）（下），http://newtalk.tw/member/preview/38283，http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/38324
1. Zheng Lijun, 2015, "Accounting Budget: Our Budget Let's Decide", Taipei: Financial Group Legal Person Youth Platform Foundation.
2. John Gastil and Peter Levine, Liu Jiexiu and Chen Yiling, 2012, "A Guide to Reviewing Democracy: Effective Strategies for the Participation of 21st Century Citizens", Taipei: Group Studies.
3. Baiocchi, G. & Lerner, J. (2007). Could Participatory Budgeting Work in the United States?The Good Society 16(1), 8-13. Penn State University Press. Retrieved November 9, 2016, from Project MUSE database.
4. Ganuza, Ernesto and Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2012) "The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe," Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 8. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art8
5. Su, Celina (2012) "Whose Budget? Our Budget? Broadening Political Stakeholdership via Participatory Budgeting," Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 1. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art1
6. Wan Yuze, 2016, "Taiwan's reflection and prospects on "participating budgeting" promotion", https://goo.gl/Ux8tRc
7. Lin Guoming, 2013, 〈How is a diverse citizenship review possible? —Proceduralism and Civil Society Views〉, Taiwan Democracy Quarterly Volume 10, Issue 4: 137-83.
8. Hong Deren, Pan Pengbin, Yang Zhibin, 2004, "Advisory Democracy in Taiwan - Taking the "Social Agreement Citizens' Meeting" in Beitou Community as an example>
9. Lin Zilun, 2008, "Appreciating Democracy in the Community: Experience in Taiwan"
10. Xie Zongxue, 2003, "The Reality of Online Democracy and the Review of Democracy: The Peach Blossom Village of Information-based Society"
11. Shi Shengwen, 2016, "Report on the Results of Taichung City Participating Budget Promotion Project"
12. Taichung City Participation Budget Promotion Planning Office, 2016, "Taichung City Participation Budget Review Host Training Manual"
13. A global journey of participating budgeting: Reflecting on how deepening democracy and real social justice is possible (Part 1) (Part 2), http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37429, http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37475
14. Unlimited Democratic Imagination: Participating in the Budget and its Cousins (Part 1) (Part 2), http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/37989, http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/38157
15. Take a look at Canada: Reflecting on the reality of "urban rights" from residential budgets in Toronto Community (Part 1) (Part 2), http://newtalk.tw/member/preview/38283, http://newtalk.tw/opinion/view/38324
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 小組課堂報告一：「案例研究比較分析」報告（成績佔30 %）小組課堂報告一：「案例研究比較分析」報告（成績佔30 %） Group Course Report 1: "Case Study Comparative Analysis" Report (Sales Accounting 30%) |
30 | |
| 小組課堂報告二：「臺中市參與式預算規劃」報告（成績佔30 %）小組課堂報告二：「臺中市參與式預算規劃」報告（成績佔30 %） Group Class Report 2: "Taizhong Market Participation Budget Planning" Report (Sales accounting for 30%) |
30 | |
| 期末心得報告一篇：「田野調查實作」、「參訪實作」兩主題擇一（佔20%）期末心得報告一篇：「田野調查實作」、「參訪實作」兩主題擇一（佔20%） A final report on experience: "Field Investigation Works" and "Interview Works" are one (accounting for 20%) |
20 | |
| 課堂暨參訪討論與平時出席（20%）課堂暨參訪討論與平時出席（20%） Class and visit discussion and attendance (20%) |
20 |
