我國刑訴法總則篇第12章證據章中，首先揭示「無罪推定」及「證據裁判主義」，第154條第1項規定：「被告未經審判證明有罪確定前，推定其為無罪。」同條第2項規定：「犯罪事實應依證據認定之，無證據不得認定犯罪事實。」再者，基於無罪推定的原理，第161條第1項規定：「檢察官就被告犯罪事實，應負舉證責任，並指出證明之方法。」明文規範檢察官舉證責任之內涵，除證據之提出外，另應就被告犯罪事實指明其證明方法，以說服法官，藉此督促檢察官善盡實行公訴之職責。
其次，關於如何依據證據來認定犯罪事實，有關證明活動的實施，第155條第2項規定應採取嚴格證明，「無證據能力，未經合法調查之證據，不得作為判斷之依據。」至於，有證據能力之證據經合法調查後，其證據價值之判斷，第155條第1項規定：「證據之證明力，由法院本於確信自由判斷。但不得違背經驗法則及論理法則」，揚棄過去由法律明定證據證明力之「證據法定主義」。精簡的三個條文五項規定，架構了支配刑事審判證據法則的體系。本學期以刑事證據法則作為專題研究課題，在正當法律程序的理念下分別探討嚴格證明法則、證據能力、調查程序、證明程度及舉證責任等相關子題，期使同學對於刑事證據法能有體系及深入的理解。In the Criminal Law Chapter 12, the Certification Chapter of the General Chapter of the Criminal Law, the "presumption of no crime" and "certification of judgement" are revealed. Article 154, Article 1 stipulates: "The defendant is presumed to be innocent before he is confirmed by the judgment of the guilt." Article 2 of the same Article: "The crime shall be determined by the evidence, and the crime shall not be determined without evidence." Furthermore, based on The principle of presumption of crime, Article 161, Article 1 stipulates: "The prosecutor shall be responsible for the defendant's criminal act and point out the method of proof." The explicit provision of the prosecutor's criminal act shall be specified in the connotation of the prosecutor's criminal act, in addition to the prosecutor's criminal act, in order to convince the judge, and urge the prosecutor to perform the duties of public prosecutors.
Secondly, regarding how to determine the crime based on the evidence, and regarding the implementation of the certification activity, Article 155, Article 2 shall adopt a strict certificate, "No proof of ability, and without legal investigation, shall not be used as a basis for judgment." As for, a proof of ability, After a legal investigation, the judgment of the value of the proof is stipulated in Article 155, Article 1: "The evidence of the proof of the proof shall be determined by the court to confirm the free judgment. However, the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the proof of the The three simple articles and five regulations constitute the system that governs the laws on criminal trials. In this period, criminal certification laws are used as a special research subject. Under the concept of proper legal procedures, they explore relevant sub-topics such as strict certification laws, certification abilities, investigation procedures, certification degree and certification responsibility, so that students can have a systematic and in-depth understanding of criminal certification laws.
授課教師參考著作
1. 1999年4月，傳聞證據，收錄於『刑事訴訟起訴狀一本主義及配套措施』一書，最高法院學術研究會出版，第383—492頁。
2. 1999年12月，司法警察人員「查訪報告」之證據能力，月旦法學第55期，第182—193頁。
3. 2000年11月，現行法下如何落實被告詰問權之保障，月旦法學第66期，第36-47頁。
4. 2000年12月，論刑事訴訟證據法則之修正，律師雜誌255期，第23-46頁。
5. 2001年10月，當事人進行原則下之證據調查與交互詰問，收錄於『刑事訴訟起訴狀一本主義及配套措施』(下)一書，最高法院學術研究會出版，第235—315頁。
6. 2003年6月，刑事訴訟之舉證責任與推定，收錄於『刑事證據法則之新發展』黃東熊教授七秩祝壽論文集一書，第437-494頁。
7. 2003年6月，刑事程序中DNA鑑定之研究，成大法學第五期，第85-119頁。
8. 2003年6月，傳聞法則之理論及其實踐，月旦法學第97期，第85-106頁。
9. 2003年7月，共同被告之調查，律師雜誌，第286期，頁97－135。
10. 2004年7月，傳聞法則與直接審理，月旦法學教室第21期，第133-136頁。
11. 2004年9月，嚴格證明法則，月旦法學教室第23期，第132-136頁。
12. 2004年10月，刑事程序鑑定之證據法則，萬國法律第137期，第32-44頁。
13. 2004年10月，違法證據排除法則之回顧與展望，月旦法學第113期，第27-50頁。
14. 2006年9月，被害人之訊問與具結，月旦法學教室第47期，第22-23頁。
15. 2006年11月，證人未經具結之檢訊筆錄之效力，月旦法學教室第49期，第20-21頁。
16. 2007年4月，偵查中證人之具結與傳聞例外之適用－評九四年台上字三二七七號刑事判決－，台灣法學第93期，第238-258頁。
17. 2007年5月，傳聞法則及其例外之實務運作問題檢討，台灣法學第94期，第128-153頁。
18. 2007年9月，評大法官解釋582號暨592號解釋，收錄於『最高法院裁判與法學理論之實踐』乙書，第651-698頁。
19. 2008年7月，貪瀆犯罪「窩裡反」條款與「刑事免責」之檢討，日新司法年刊，第8期，第96-101頁。
20. 2008年11月，證據能力有無之舉證問題研究，收錄於『刑與思─林山田教授紀念論文集』乙書，第461-491頁。
21. 2008年12月，論檢察官舉證責任與法院職權調查之界限--以最高法院92台上128號刑事判例為中心，收錄於『刑事證據法--最高法院學術研究叢書(16)』，第295-328頁。
22. 2009年1月，我國特別偵查組之現況與未來，檢察新論，第5期，第20-22
23. 2010年4月，當事人一方所為之秘密錄音──評日本千葉地院平成三年三月二十九日判決，裁判時報第2期，第151-158頁。
24. 2010年6月，共同被告於檢察官偵查訊問時所為之陳述之證據能力，台灣法學雜誌第153期，第217-222頁。
25. 2010年8月，醫療刑事訴訟之證明活動，月旦法學雜誌第183期，第5-20頁。
26. 2011年04月，改善我國刑事鑑定制度之芻議-兼論專家證人之地位與功能，全國律師，第15卷第4期，第87-104頁。
References by teachers
1. In April 1999, the certificate was published in the book "One Idea and Supporting Measures for Criminal Investigation" published by the Supreme Court Academic Research Association, pages 383-492.
2. In December 1999, the judicial police officer's ability to "check the visit report", Yuedan Law No. 55, pages 182-193.
3. In November 2000, how to implement the protection of the defendant's right to question under the current law, Yuedan Law No. 66, pages 36-47.
4. In December 2000, discussing the amendment of the Criminal Certification Law, Lawyer Magazine No. 255, pages 23-46.
5. In October 2001, the parties conducted a certificate investigation and interactive question under the principle, and included it in the book "One Idea and Supporting Measures for Criminal Claims" (Part 2), published by the Supreme Court Academic Research Association, pages 235-315.
6. In June 2003, the proof responsibility and presumption of criminal complaints were included in the "New Development of Criminal Certification Law" Collection of Essays by Professor Huang Dongxiong Seven Orders, pages 437-494.
7. In June 2003, the study of DNA predication in criminal procedures, Chengda Law, Issue 5, Pages 85-119.
8. In June 2003, the theory and its practical theory of the law was published, Yuedan Law No. 97, pages 85-106.
9. In July 2003, the investigation of the co-defendant, Lawyer Magazine, No. 286, pages 97-135.
10. July 2004, Communication Law and Direct Review, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 21, Pages 133-136.
11. In September 2004, the law was strictly certified, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 23, pages 132-136.
12. In October 2004, Certification Laws for Criminal Procedure Preparation, No. 137, Pages 32-44.
13. In October 2004, the review and prospect of the exclusion law of the law was reviewed and expected, Yuedan Law No. 113, pages 27-50.
14. In September 2006, the victim’s information and conclusions, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 47, pages 22-23.
15. In November 2006, the witness did not have the effect of the finalized review record, Yuedan Law Classroom No. 49, pages 20-21.
16. In April 2007, the investigation into the application of the evidence and the exception of the report - Review of the Criminal Judgment of the 1994th Taiwan Law No. 3277 - Taiwan Law No. 93, pages 238-258.
17. In May 2007, the review of practical operational problems of communication law and its exceptions, Taiwan Law No. 94, pages 128-153.
18. In September 2007, the Justice reviewed No. 582 and No. 592, and was included in Book B, "Realization of Supreme Court Judgments and Jurisprudence", pages 651-698.
19. In July 2008, the review of the "Criminal Disability" clause and the "Criminal Disability" of the Criminal Crime, Japanese New Judicial Annual, Issue 8, pages 96-101.
20. In November 2008, the study of certifying problems with proof ability was included in "Criminal and Thought-Professor Lin Yamada's Collection of Remarks", pages 461-491.
21. In December 2008, the boundary between prosecutor's certificate of responsibility and court vocational investigation - centered on the Criminal Jurisdiction No. 128 on the Supreme Court, and was included in the "Criminal Certification Law-Supreme Court Academic Research Book (16)", pages 295-328.
22. In January 2009, the current situation and future of our special investigation group, reviewing the new discussion, No. 5, No. 20-22
23. In April 2010, the secret record of the parties involved - reviewing the judgment of the Chiye Prefecture Court in Japan on March 29, 2013. The referee time report No. 2, pages 151-158.
24. In June 2010, the co-defendant's certification ability was reported by the prosecutor when he interrogated the inquiry, Taiwan Law Journal Issue 153, pages 217-222.
25. In August 2010, the Certification Activity for Medical Criminal Disclaimer, Yuedan Law Journal Issue 183, Pages 5-20.
26. In April 2011, the proposal to improve the criminal forensic system in my country - also discuss the status and function of expert certificate, National Lawyer, Vol. 15, No. 4, Pages 87-104.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂報告與參與討論課堂報告與參與討論 Class report and discussion |
50 | |
| 期末報告期末報告 Final report |
50 |
