使學習者能掌握民主治理與行政改革的背景、概念與發展，有助於觀念啟發與實務之運用。

Enable learners to master the background, concept and development of democratic governance and administrative reform, which will help the development and practical use of concepts.

本課程分為兩大部份：治理行政改革。在治理部分我們將介公民參與、網絡治理、跨域治理等課題；在行政改革部分，我們將探討組織再造、民營化、績效管理與預算改革等重要議題，期使研習者能掌握「治理」與「改革」之間的動態連結。

This course is divided into two major parts: governance administrative reform. In the governance part, we will introduce subjects such as citizen participation, network governance, and cross-domain governance; in the administrative reform part, we will explore important topics such as organizational reconstruction, publicization, performance management and budget reform, so that researchers can master the dynamic link between "governance" and "reform".

1. Blackstock, K. L.(2009).Between a rock and a hard place: Incompatible objectives at the heart of river. Water Science & Technology, 59(3): 425-432.
2. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, & M. M. Stone (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (1): 44-55.
3. Colvin, J. et al. (2008). Building capacity for co-operative governance as a basis for integrated water resource managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti catchments, South Africa. Water SA, 34(6): 681-689.
4. Domenico, MariaLaura Di, et al. (2009). The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate Social Enterprise Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8): 887–907.
5. Ghose, Rina (2005). The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance. Space and Polity, 9(1): 61-75.
6. Heikkila, Tanya and Andrea K. Gerlak (2005). The Formation of Large-scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(4): 583-612.
7. Heyns, P. S. vH. (2007).Governance of a shared and contested resource: A case study of the Okavango River Basin. Water Policy, 9(2): 149-167.
8. Ho, Peter (2006). Trajectories for Greening in China: Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 37(1): 3-28.
9. Holmes, Sara & Lance Moir (2007). Developing a conceptual framework to identify corporate innovations through engagement with non-profit stakeholders. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 7 (4): 414-422.
10. Kidd, S. & D. Shaw (2007). Integrated water resource management and institutional integration: Realising the potential of spatial planning in England. The Geographical Journal, 173(4): 312-329.
11. Lee, Tai Sik (2004). Buried treasure. Civil Engineering, 33-41.
12. Makipaa, Marko (2009). Inter-organizational information systems in cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Study of the factors influencing to success. IFIP (Interna

1. Blackstock, K. L. (2009).Between a rock and a hard place: Incompatible objectives at the heart of river. Water Science & Technology, 59(3): 425-432.
2. Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, & M. M. Stone (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66 (1): 44-55.
3. Colvin, J. et al. (2008). Building capacity for co-operative government as a basis for integrated water resource managing in the Inkomati and Mvoti catchments, South Africa. Water SA, 34(6): 681-689.
4. Domenico, MariaLaura Di, et al. (2009). The Dialectic of Social Exchange: Theorizing Corporate Social Enterprise Collaboration. Organization Studies, 30(8): 887–907.
5. Ghose, Rina (2005). The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance. Space and Polity, 9(1): 61-75.
6. Heikkila, Tanya and Andrea K. Gerlak (2005). The Formation of Large-scale Collaborative Resource Management Institutions: Clarifying the Roles of Stakeholders, Science, and Institutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(4): 583-612.
7. Heyns, P. S. vH. (2007).Governance of a shared and contested resource: A case study of the Okavango River Basin. Water Policy, 9(2): 149-167.
8. Ho, Peter (2006). Trajectories for Greening in China: Theory and Practice. Development and Change, 37(1): 3-28.
9. Holmes, Sara & Lance Moir (2007). Developing a conceptual framework to identify corporate innovations through engagement with non-profit stakeholders. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 7 (4): 414-422.
10. Kidd, S. & D. Shaw (2007). Integrated water resource management and institutional integration: Realising the potential of spatial planning in England. The Geographical Journal, 173(4): 312-329.
11. Lee, Tai Sik (2004). Buried treasure. Civil Engineering, 33-41.
12. Makipaa, Marko (2009). Inter-organizational information systems in cooperative inter-organizational relationships: Study of the factors influencing to success. IFIP (Interna