《大智度論》漢譯共一百卷，論本的結構包含了《兩萬五千頌般若經》的經文與釋論，整部論乃經論會編的型式。其中內容涉及了佛教內、外部理論與相關議題，可說是包羅萬象，因此常被稱譽為佛教的百科全書。
此外，自中國佛教哲學發展的脈絡來看，自古至今許多學者在義理的論說與詮釋開展之過程中也常徵引《大智度論》的某些觀點，來作為說明或強化其觀點的文證。因此，論中豐富的議題不但可作為佛教哲學探究的題材，透過深究論中的義理，也可作為了解中國佛教哲學在此論譯出後之詮釋取向的來由。
本課程規劃為一學年的課程。獨立閱讀與詮釋原典之能力的培養更是本課程的重要目標，因此課程將引導學生們循序漸進地進行地毯式的閱讀《大智度論》，養成把握《大智度論》的哲學理論的能力。待同學們初步能把握《大智度論》之基礎哲學理論後，教師在本課程中將引導同學盡可能同時閱讀與分析當前學界與《大智度論》相關的研究成果，期能透過這樣的訓練養成同學們獨立閱讀與研究的能力。
綜合以上，本課程規劃每個課題的研討均包含初步的理解、深入的討論、引導學生獨立閱讀與詮釋相關的原典與文本以及閱讀分析學界的研究成果等幾個部份，希望藉由這樣的訓練，培養學生的批判思考與獨立研究能力。The Han version of "The Great Wisdom Discourse" has a total of 100 volumes. The structure of the book includes the essays and discussions of "Twenty-Five Thousand Prajna Sect". The whole discussion is a type compiled by the discussion. The content involves internal and external theories and related issues of Buddhism, which can be said to be a vague phenomenon, so it is often called a Buddhist encyclopedia.
In addition, from the perspective of the development of Chinese Buddhist philosophy, many scholars have often quoted certain views of the "Great Wisdom Discourse" in the process of theoretical discussion and discussion as a document to illustrate or enhance their views. Therefore, the rich topics in the discussion can not only be used as topics for Buddhist philosophy, but also as a reason to understand the orientation of Chinese Buddhist philosophy after it was translated into this discussion.
This course is planned for a year. The cultivation of independent reading and scrutinizing the original text is an important goal of this course. Therefore, the course will guide students to read the "Great Wisdom Discussion" step by step, and develop the ability to grasp the philosophical theory of "Great Wisdom Discussion". After students can initially grasp the basic philosophical theory of "Great Wisdom Discussion", the teacher will guide students in this course to read and analyze the research results related to the current academic community and "Great Wisdom Discussion" at the same time, hoping to cultivate the students' ability to read and research independently through such training.
Based on the above, the discussion on each subject in this course plans includes several parts, including preliminary understanding, in-depth discussion, guiding students to read and comment independently and relate to original texts and texts, and research results from the reading and analysis community. We hope that through this training, we can cultivate students' critical thinking and independent research capabilities.
（一）原典：
1. 唐‧玄奘譯，《大般若波羅蜜多經‧第二會》；《大正藏》冊7。
2. 後秦‧鳩摩羅什譯，《摩訶般若波羅蜜經》；《大正藏》冊8。
3. 後秦‧鳩摩羅什譯，《大智度論》；《大正藏》冊25。
4. 釋厚觀編，《大智度論講義》（一）-（七），印順文教基金會，2015年。
（二）其他參考文獻
1. Étienne Lamotte, Le Traite de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse de Nagarjuna, Tome I-II, Louvain: Bureau du Museon, 1944, 1949. Tome III-V, Louvain: Universite de Louvain Institut Orientaliste, 1970, 1976, 1980.
2. K. Venkata Ramanan, Nāgārjuna's Philosophy: As Presented in the Mahā-Prajñāpāramitā-śāstra, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.
3. Tadeusz Skorupski, The six Perfections: An Abridged Version of E. Lamotte’s French Translation of Nāgājuna’s Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra, Chapter XVI-XXX, Buddhiva Britannica Series Continua IX, UK, Tring: The Institute of Buddhist Studies, 2002.
4. 武田浩学，《大智度論の研究》，東京：山喜房佛書林，2005年。
5. 大野栄人，〈《大智度論》の中国的展開〉，愛知学院大学人間文化研究所：《人間文化》第16期，2001年9，頁1-44。
6. 干瀉龍祥，〈大智度論の作者について〉，《印度学仏教学研究》，第7卷第1號，1958年12月1日，頁1-12。
7. 玉井威，〈《大智度論》の著者について〉，《佛教學セミナー》，第24期，1976年10月30日，頁21-36。
8. 斎藤明，〈《大智度論》所引の《中論》頌考〉，《東洋文化研究所紀要》，第143號，2003年，頁1-36。
9. 加藤純章，〈大智度論の世界〉，收於平川彰、梶山雄一、高崎直道編，《講座‧大乗仏教2》，《般若思想》，東京：春秋社，1983年，頁151-192。（中譯：〈大智度論的世界〉，收於梶山雄一等著，許洋主譯，《般若思想》，臺北：法爾出版社，1989，頁161-197。）
10. 王麗芳、王海明主編 《敦煌寫經－大智度論》，杭州：西冷印社，2004年。
11. 周伯戡，〈《大智度論》略譯初探〉，《中華佛學學報》，第13期第1卷，2000年5月1日，頁155-165。
12. 周伯戡，〈庫車所出《大智度論》寫本殘卷之研究－兼論鳩摩羅什之翻譯〉，《國立臺灣大學歷史學系學報》，第17期，1992年12月1日，頁65-106。
13. 郭忠生譯，Étienne Lamotte, <大智度論之作者及翻譯>，《諦觀》，第62~69期，1990年7月~1992年4月。
14. 牟宗三 《佛性與般若》上冊，臺北：臺灣學生書局，1977年。
15. 萬金川 《龍樹的語言概念》，南投：正觀，1995年。
14. 釋印順，〈《大智度論》之作者及其翻譯〉，《永光集》，新竹：正聞出版社，2004年6月，頁1-122。
15. 釋厚觀、郭忠生合編，〈《大智度論》之本文相互索引〉，《正觀雜誌》，第6期，1998年9月25日，頁5-321。
16. 嚴瑋泓，〈「迦羅」( Kāla)或「三摩耶」(Samaya)？－以「時間」議題論《大智度論》批判實在論的哲學問題〉，《臺大佛學研究》，第20期，2010年12月，頁1-57。
17. 嚴瑋泓，〈試論牟宗三先生對《大智度論》的哲學詮釋〉，《鵝湖》，第451期，2013年01月，頁27-38。
18. 嚴瑋泓，〈東晉慧遠是實在論者嗎？—以其詮解《大智度論》之觀點為線索的哲學研究〉，《國立政治大學哲學學報》，第34期，2015年07月，頁165-208。
(I) Original text:
1. Translated by Xuanzang of the Tang Dynasty, "The Second Session of the Great Prajna Palomita"; "Taisho Tsang" 7.
2. Later Qin Dynasty, Maharashilu, "Mozabu Prajna Prajna Prajna"; "Taisho Tsang" 8.
3. Later Qin Dynasty, Mauroshilu, "The Great Wisdom Discussion"; "Taisho Tsang" 25.
4. Editorial of "The Great Wisdom Discussion" (I)-(VII), Yindu Cultural and Educational Foundation, 2015.
(II) Other references
1. Étienne Lamotte, Le Traite de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse de Nagarjuna, Tome I-II, Louvain: Bureau du Museon, 1944, 1949. Tome III-V, Louvain: Universite de Louvain Institute Orientaliste, 1970, 1976, 1980.
2. K. Venkata Ramanan, Nāgārjuna's Philosophy: As Presented in the Mahā-Prajñāpāramitā-śāstra, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.
3. Tadeusz Skorupski, The six Perfections: An Abridged Version of E. Lamotte’s French Translation of Nāgājuna’s Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra, Chapter XVI-XXX, Buddhava Britannica Series Continua IX, UK, Tring: The Institute of Buddhist Studies, 2002.
4. Takeda Hirosai, "Research on the Great Wisdom Discussion", Tokyo: Yamahifang Buddhist Book Forest, 2005.
5. Ono Shinto, "The Exposure of China in "The Great Wisdom Discussion", Institute of Human Culture, University of Aizhi College: Human Culture, Issue 16, 2001, pp. 1-44.
6. Gan Ling Longxiang, "Author of the Great Wisdom Discussion", "Research on Indian Learning Teaching", Volume 7 No. 1, December 1, 1958, pages 1-12.
7. Wei Yu, "The Great Wisdom Discussion", "Buddhist Scholarship", No. 24, October 30, 1976, pages 21-36.
8. Akira Kofuji, "Examination of the Chinese Theory" cited by "The Great Wisdom Discussion", "Essence of the Institute of Eastern Culture", No. 143, 2003, pages 1-36.
9. Kato's pure chapter, "The World of Great Wisdom Discussion", included in the compilation of Akira Hirakawa, Yuichi Kajiyama, and Naoto Takasaki, "Talks of the Dayaya 2", "Prajna Thought", Tokyo: Spring and Autumn Society, 1983, pages 151-192. (Chinese translation: "The World of Great Wisdom Discussion", collected in Yuichi Kajiyama, translated by Yui Kajiyama, "Prajna Thought", Taipei: Fal Publishing House, 1989, page 161-197.)
10. Edited by Wang Lifang and Wang Haiming "Dunhuang Writing - Dazhidu Discussion", Hangzhou: Xileng Seal Society, 2004.
11. Zhou Bokan, "A Brief Study on the Summary of the Great Wisdom Discipline", "Records of Chinese Buddhism", Volume 13, Volume 1, May 1, 2000, pages 155-165.
12. Zhou Bokan, "Research on the Book of Great Wisdom" published by the Institute of Kujia - and the Translation of the Confucian Morosh", "Department of History of National Taiwan University", Issue 17, December 1, 1992, pages 65-106.
13. Guo Zhongsheng translated, Étienne Lamotte,
14. Mou Zongsan "Buddha Nature and Prajna" was published, Taipei: Taiwan Student Book Bureau, 1977.
15. Wan Jinchuan "The Language Concept of Dragon Trees", Nantou: Zhengxi, 1995.
14. Yin Yin, "The Author and Translation of "The Great Wisdom Discourse", "Yongguang Collection", Hsinchu: Zhengqiu Publishing House, June 2004, pages 1-122.
15. Co-edited by Yanghouguan and Guo Zhongsheng, "Mutual Index of the Articles of "Great Wisdom Discussion", "Music Magazine", Issue 6, September 25, 1998, Pages 5-321.
16. Seriously, "Kāla" or "Samaya"? -Criticize the Philosophical Questions of Realism in the "Time" Discussion on "Great Wisdom Discourse", "Research on the Study of the Great Buddha", No. 20, December 2010, Pages 1-57.
17. Stern Weihong, "Trying to discuss Mr. Mou Zongsan's Philosophical Review of "The Great Wisdom Discussion", "Zhihu", No. 451, January 2013, pages 27-38.
18. Seriously, "Is Dongchen Hui Far a real debater?" —Philosophical Research on the Introductory Views of the Great Wisdom Discussion>, "Philosophy of the National University of Political Science", Issue 34, July 2015, pages 165-208.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平時成績平時成績 Regular achievements |
50 | 包含出席率(20%)、課前準備與課堂討論(30%) |
| 期末論文期末論文 Final discussion |
50 | 包含期末小型研討會論文發表(10%)、學期完整論文(40%) |
