這裡的「方法」意指：一、問題的基本處理架構；二、處理中應用的技術。前者主要討論程序或方法之基本邏輯的適切性，而後者講究有效率的處理模式或技巧。
本課程目的即在讓學生透過上述相關的討論，認知都市規劃作業行為本身的侷限性和多元性格，並能習得簡單的、常用的規劃處理技法，以培養最基本的規劃能力和奠定爾後都市研究的基礎。The "method" here means: 1. The basic processing structure of the problem; 2. The technology applied in the processing. The former mainly discusses the appropriateness of basic logic of procedures or methods, while the latter discusses efficient processing modes or techniques.
The purpose of this course is to allow students to understand the limitations and diverse personalities of urban planning behavior through the above-mentioned related discussions, and to obtain simple and commonly used planning treatment techniques to cultivate the most basic planning capabilities and lay the foundation for post-urban urban research.
一、Jr. Chapin, F. Stuart;and Kaiser,Edward J.都市土地使用規劃 ( Urban Land Use Planning )。李瑞麟譯。 台北市：茂榮圖書有限公司，民國87年10月。
二、Berke, Philip R.；Godschalk, David R.；Kaiser, Edward J.；Rodriguez, Daniel A.都市土地使用規劃（Urban Land Use Planning）。薩支平譯。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，民國98年3月。
三、Leitmann, Joseph. 永續都市—都市設計之環境管理（Sustaining Cities: Environmental Planning and Management in Urban Design）。吳綱立、李麗雪譯。台北市：六合出版社，民國91年1月。
1. Jr. Chapin, F. Stuart; and Kaiser, Edward J. Urban Land Use Planning ( Urban Land Use Planning). Li Ruilin translated. Taipei City: Maorong Books Co., Ltd., October 1987.
2. Berke, Philip R.; Godschalk, David R.; Kaiser, Edward J.; Rodriguez, Daniel A. Urban Land Use Planning.大全全全全全全. Taipei City: Wunan Book Publishing Co., Ltd., March 1998, Republic of China.
3. Leitmann, Joseph. Sustaining Cities: Environmental Planning and Management in Urban Design. Wu Xuli and Li Lixue. Taipei City: Liuhe Publishing House, January 1991, Republic of China.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 學生出席學生出席 Students attend |
10 | 以點名到課次數為基準，不論缺席事由，有否請假。 |
| 期中考試成績期中考試成績 Midterm exam results |
15 | |
| 學期考試成績學期考試成績 Year exam results |
20 | |
| 自我學習發表之學生互評及老師考核自我學習發表之學生互評及老師考核 Self-learning and publishing students' mutual review and teacher assessment |
55 |
