為因應法律系學生之具體需求，使之能有效將邏輯推理運用到法律的詮釋與判斷上，本課程採用循序漸進之教學方法，首先透過批判思考之學習讓學生熟悉推理論證的思辯過程，區分有效論據與無效論據間之差別，使其能具體應用批判性思考的技巧和方法於日常生活及課業上，其次再介紹形式邏輯之基本概念與規則，使學生能熟練於形式化的推理方法，以培養其抽象思維與邏輯推理之能力。本課程所引介之具體內容將包括：(1)簡介論證概念、(2)議題、結論與理由、(3)替代論證、(4)比較論證證據、(5)有根據的推論、(6)檢查假設與蘊涵、(7)規範性論證、(8)比較論證好壞、(9)理解複雜論證、(10)商議與辯論之差異、(11)實驗、相關性與思辯、(12)謬誤的脆弱結構、(13)形式邏輯基本概念、(14)命題邏輯、(15)真值表法。In order to meet the specific needs of law students, so that they can effectively apply logical reasoning to the discussion and judgment of the law, this course adopts a step-by-step teaching method. First, through the learning of critical thinking, students are familiar with the thinking process of reasoning and criticism, and divide them into effective discussion and non-existence. The difference between effectiveness allows them to apply critical thinking skills and methods in daily life and courses. Secondly, they introduce the basic concepts and rules of formal logic, so that students can be familiar with formal reasoning methods to cultivate their ability to abstract thinking and logical reasoning. The specific contents introduced in this course will include: (1) Introduction to the concept of the certificate, (2) Proposition, Conclusion and Reason, (3) Substitutional Certificate, (4) Comparative Certificate, (5) Subjective Certificate, (6) Check hypothesis and connotation, (7) Regular Certificate, (8) ) Comparative evidence is good, (9) Understanding complex arguments, (10) Differences between negotiations and discussions, (11) Experience, correlation and thinking, (12) Fragile structures of misunderstandings, (13) Basic concepts of formal logic, (14) Provocation logic, and (15) Truth table method.
入大學無論就讀哪一專業科系，邏輯思考是基本的訓練。不同專業只是思考之對象領域不同，但都是思考，既是思考就必須遵循一定的思考法則，才能作合理的思考，邏輯提供了基礎的訓練。
Regular thinking is the basic training when you enter university. Different professions are just different objects of thinking, but they are all thinking. Since it is thinking, it must follow certain thinking methods in order to make reasonable thinking. Logic provides a basic training.
C. A. Missimer，《批判思考導論──如何精進論證》。蔡偉鼎譯。台北：學富，2002。
C. A. Missimer, "Critical Thinking Discussion-How to Improve the Certification". Cai Wei Ding Lu. Taipei: Learning Rich, 2002.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平常上課表現平常上課表現 Normal class presentation |
10 | 包含出缺席與上課討論參與狀況 |
| 隨堂作業隨堂作業 Works in the Hall |
30 | |
| 期中考試期中考試 Midterm exam |
30 | |
| 期末考試期末考試 Final exam |
30 |
