Home
通識課程:社會領域
course information of 104 - 2 | 3333 Congressional Politics(社會:國會政治)

Taught In English3333 - 社會:國會政治 Congressional Politics


教育目標 Course Target

本課程乃是通識社會科學的選修課程。其內容主要在探討民主憲政體制下(不論是總統制,議會制抑或是半總統制),國會(立法機關)必然是政府權力中心的事實。在民主憲政體制下,法律必須由民選的國會所制定,國會藉由法律的制定,為整個社會做權威性的價值分配,因此民主政治的統治必須以贏得國會的多數支持為前提。不過,國會雖然具有立法的權力,而其如何立法則需視國會內部的結構(structure),以及國會與其他政治機構(political institutions)之間的互動關係而定。基本上,國會的立法過程(legislative process)乃是政治過程(political process)的一環。本課程旨在介紹國會內部的結構,並說明影響國會立法的政治因素,以期學生具備相關的政治知識,決策分析,協商與領導的能力。This course is an optional course for general social sciences. The content mainly involves exploring the democratic system (whether it is a general system, a council or a semi-council), and the National Assembly (legislative agency) must be the center of government power. Under the democratic system, the law must be formulated by the people-selected state. The state uses the law to make a authority and value distribution for the entire society. Therefore, the rule of democratic politics must be based on winning the majority of the support of the state. However, although the Congress has the power to legislate, how it legislates depends on the structure within the Congress and the interaction between the Congress and other political institutions. Basically, the legislative process of the Congress is a circle of political processes. This course aims to introduce the structure within the association and explain the political factors that affect the association’s legislation, so as to hope that students can have relevant political knowledge, decision-making analysis, consultation and leadership abilities.


課程概述 Course Description

通識課程不同於專業課程,實乃著重引導學生主動關懷、探索與實踐人類的終極價值與智慧;同時通識課程所提供的知識,不是專業課程的淺薄化,而是具有厚實感的基礎知識。本校根據創校傳統、校訓與辦學理念訂定通識教育定四大基本素養:求真素養、篤信素養、力行素養與宏通素養,以具體落實本校通識教育之理想。希望本校學生能發揮自主學習精神,在通識課程老師的引導下,逐漸培養其通識教育基本素養,並期待能終身學習。各種基本素養並訂有具體的學習成效指標,以做教學與學習成效之自我檢證的具體指標,分述如下:求真素養(自然領域):1.學習自然科學的方法或哲學以探索物理與生命世界的微妙,2.發揮就事論事的精神,3.能參與科學議題相關的公共事務。篤信素養(人文領域):1.學習人文精神以探索內在自我與領會人類文明的深層價值,2.發展自律精神,3.能運用理性進行道德推理。力行素養(社會領域):1.運用社會科學的方法或哲學以激發學生的傾聽與溝通能力,2.承認與尊重多元差,3.實踐民主審議的精神。宏通素養(跨領域):1.追求人類的整體價值,2.融通求真、篤信、力行等素養於個人生命之中。各領域的課程對於學習成效指標可以跨選,不必拘泥。
The general course is different from the professional course, and it actually focuses on guiding students to actively care, explore and understand the ultimate value and wisdom of human beings. At the same time, the knowledge provided by the general course is not the purity of the professional course, but the basic knowledge with a strong sense of reality. . Our school has established four basic qualities for general education based on the concept of creating school traditions, school training and management: seeking truth, trustworthiness, striving for general education, and implementing the ideal of general education in our school in a specific way. I hope that students of this school can develop the spirit of independent learning, and under the guidance of general course teachers, they will gradually cultivate their basic qualities of general education, and look forward to finally learning. Various basic ingredient cultivation and have specific learning effectiveness indicators to serve as a specific indicator for self-verification of teaching and learning effectiveness, which are divided into the following: Truth-seeking cultivation (nature field): 1. Learn the methods or philosophy of natural sciences to explore physics The subtlety of the life world, 2. Develop the spirit of doing things, 3. Be able to participate in public affairs related to scientific issues. Relief and nourishment (humanity field): 1. Learn the humanistic spirit to explore the deep value of inner self and leading human civilization, 2. Develop self-discipline spirit, 3. Be able to use rationality to conduct moral reasoning. Practice and cultivate (social field): 1. Use social science methods or philosophy to stimulate students' listening and communication skills, 2. Accept and respect for diversity and differences, 3. Realize the spirit of democratic review. Hongtong basic cultivation (cross-domain): 1. Pursuing the overall value of human beings, 2. Integrating truth-seeking, trustworthiness, and action in personal life. Courses in various fields can be selected across learning performance indicators without being restricted.


參考書目 Reference Books

(1) Dalton, Russell J. and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2000. Parties without Partisans Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2) Dodd, Lawrence C. 2012. Thinking about Congress: Essays on Congressional Change. New York: Routledge.
(3) Dodd, Lawrence C. and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. ed. 2013. Congress: Reconsidered. London: Sage.
(4) Hazan, Reuven Y. ed. 2011. Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. New York: Routledge.
(5) Jenkins, Jeffery A., Eric M. Patashnik. 2012. Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Law Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(6) Keefe, William, and Morris S. Ogul. 2001. The American Legislative Process: Congress and the States. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
(7) McKay, William, and Charles W. Johnson. 2012. Parliament and Congress: Representation and Scrutiny in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
(8) Oleszek, Walter J. 2014. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. London: Sage.
(9) Schickler, Eric and Frances E. Lee. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of The American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
(10) Smith, Steven S., Jason M. Roberts, and Ryan Vander Wielen. 2011. The American Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(11) Stewart III, Charles. 2012. Analyzing Congress. New York: W.W. Norton.
(12) Stratus, Jacob R. 2012. Party and Procedure in the United States Congress. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
(13) Thurber, James A. ed., 2009. Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
(14) 王中天(2010),<當社會信任遇見政治信任—對政治文化觀點的整合與檢驗>,(台灣民主季刊)第7卷第4期,頁47~83。
(15) 任冀平(2014),<司法審查存立的制度性基礎>,(全球政治評論)第48期,頁27~62。
(16) 任冀平(2011),<法院與政治:美國司法政治初探>,(全球政治評論)第33期,頁73~95。
(17) 廖達琪、陳月卿、李承訓(2013),<半總統制下的國會監督-從法制面比較台灣與法國國會的監督能量>,(問題與研究)第52卷第2期,頁51~97。
(18) 彭錦鵬(2001),<從歐美經驗論國會議員人數及「立委席次減半」>,(政治科學論叢)第15期,頁171~190。
(19) 黃秀端、何嵩婷(2007),<黨團協商與國會立法:第五屆立法院的分析>
(1) Dalton, Russell J. and Martin P. Wattenberg. 2000. Parties without Partisans Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2) Dodd, Lawrence C. 2012. Thinking about Congress: Essays on Congressional Change. New York: Routledge.
(3) Dodd, Lawrence C. and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. ed. 2013. Congress: Reconsidered. London: Sage.
(4) Hazan, Reuven Y. ed. 2011. Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. New York: Routledge.
(5) Jenkins, Jeffery A., Eric M. Patashnik. 2012. Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Law Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(6) Keefe, William, and Morris S. Ogul. 2001. The American Legislative Process: Congress and the States. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
(7) McKay, William, and Charles W. Johnson. 2012. Parliament and Congress: Representation and Scrutiny in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
(8) Oleszek, Walter J. 2014. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. London: Sage.
(9) Schickler, Eric and Frances E. Lee. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of The American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.
(10) Smith, Steven S., Jason M. Roberts, and Ryan Vander Wielen. 2011. The American Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(11) Stewart III, Charles. 2012. Analyzing Congress. New York: W.W. Norton.
(12) Stratus, Jacob R. 2012. Party and Procedure in the United States Congress. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
(13) Thurber, James A. ed., 2009. Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
(14) Wang Zhongtian (2010), , (Taiwan Democracy Quarterly) Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 47~83.
(15) Ren Jiping (2014), , (Global Political Review) Issue 48, Pages 27~62.
(16) Ren Jiping (2011), , (Global Political Review) Issue 33, Pages 73~95.
(17) Liao Daqi, Chen Yueqing, Li Cheng (2013), (Questions and Research) Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 51~97 .
(18) Peng Wang (2001), , (Political Sciences Forum) No. 15, pages 171~190.
(19) Huang Xiuduan and He Songting (2007),


評分方式 Grading

評分項目 Grading Method 配分比例 Grading percentage 說明 Description
出席上課出席上課
Attendance to the class
5
報告報告
report
33
期中考期中考
Midterm exam
33
期末考期末考
Final exam
33

授課大綱 Course Plan

Click here to open the course plan. Course Plan
交換生/外籍生選課登記 - 請點選下方按鈕加入登記清單,再等候任課教師審核。
Add this class to your wishlist by click the button below.
請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first


相似課程 Related Course

很抱歉,沒有符合條件的課程。 Sorry , no courses found.

Course Information

Description

學分 Credit:0-3
上課時間 Course Time:Tuesday/7,8,9[C113]
授課教師 Teacher:任冀平
修課班級 Class:共必修1-4
選課備註 Memo:政治系不得選修
This Course is taught In English 授課大綱 Course Plan: Open

選課狀態 Attendance

There're now 41 person in the class.
目前選課人數為 41 人。

請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first