Home
通識課程:人文領域
course information of 104 - 2 | 3176 Introduction to Logic and Critical(人文:邏輯與批判思考)

Taught In English3176 - 人文:邏輯與批判思考 Introduction to Logic and Critical


教育目標 Course Target

本課程的具體實施目標有六項: 1. 能明白邏輯思維的特徵 2. 能認識並操作形式邏輯的基本理論及推論 3. 能分辨形式邏輯與非形式邏輯的差別 4. 能了解非形式邏輯推論的應用場合與規範準則 5. 能體會在進行日常推論行動時,批判與同情理解能力的重要性 6. 透過課程學習以及評量活動的設計,發展並陶養學生進行多元思考、溝通協調、正確的價值判斷、以及以有效率的方式解決問題等多種能力。There are six specific implementation goals for this course: 1. Be able to understand the characteristics of logical thinking 2. Be able to understand and operate the basic theories and inferences of formal logic 3. Be able to distinguish the difference between formal logic and informal logic 4. Be able to understand the application situations and norms of informal logical inferences 5. Be able to appreciate the importance of critical and sympathetic understanding when making daily inferences 6. Through the design of curriculum learning and assessment activities, develop and cultivate students' multiple abilities such as diverse thinking, communication and coordination, correct value judgment, and efficient problem solving.


參考書目 Reference Books

本課程以教師自編講義為主。另有建議參考閱讀資料。

以下為進階參考閱讀料:
形式邏輯部分:
1. H. Kahane, Logic and Philosophy: A modern Introduction, Univ. of Maryland, 1986.
2. I. Copi and C. Cohen, Introduction to Logic, Macmillan, 1994.
3. 《邏輯》,熊明輝,王文方著,滄海書局,2011。
4. 林正弘著,《邏輯》,三民書局出版,2002。
5. 台灣大學理則學教學委員會編著,《理則學新論》,正中書局,1995。

批判思考與非形式邏輯部分:
1. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair. 1977. Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
2. Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
---. 1996. Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Tversky A. & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases--biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1131.4. 徐金雲,2010,《亞里斯多德《修辭學》中的語用空缺》問題研究:一個當代非形式邏輯的考察》。
---. 2012,〈證明的責任與批判的責任 --- 視覺化的論證圖示與法律推理〉,第八屆東亞法哲學研討會會議論文集。
---. 2012,〈實踐推論語用教學法—以交通大學通識教學為例〉,《通識教育學刊》,2012六月號,頁85-112。
---. 2013,醫科大學的邏輯與批判性思考教學,高醫通識教育學刊,第八期,頁1-23。
---. 2014,回溯推論與批判性思考,高醫通識教育學刊,第九期,頁25-53。
This course is mainly based on handouts compiled by teachers. Additional readings are recommended.

The following are advanced reference reading materials:
Formal logic part:
1. H. Kahane, Logic and Philosophy: A modern Introduction, Univ. of Maryland, 1986.
2. I. Copi and C. Cohen, Introduction to Logic, Macmillan, 1994.
3. "Logic", written by Xiong Minghui and Wang Wenfang, Canghai Bookstore, 2011.
4. Lin Zhenghong, "Logic", published by Sanmin Book Company, 2002.
5. Compiled by the Logos Teaching Committee of National Taiwan University, "New Theory of Logos", Zhengzhong Book Company, 1995.

Critical Thinking and Informal Logic Section:
1. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair. 1977. Logical self-defense. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
2. Walton, Douglas N. 1996. Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
---. 1996. Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Tversky A. & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases--biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1131.4. Xu Jinyun, 2010, "Aristotle "Pragmatic Gaps in Rhetoric": A Study of Contemporary Informal Logic.
---. 2012, "The Burden of Proof and the Burden of Criticism --- Visual Argument Illustration and Legal Reasoning", Proceedings of the Eighth East Asian Legal Philosophy Symposium.
---. 2012, "Practical Inference Pragmatic Teaching Method—Taking the General Education Teaching of Jiaotong University as an Example", "Journal of General Education", June 2012, pp. 85-112.
---. 2013, Teaching logic and critical thinking in medical universities, Journal of Higher Medical General Education, Issue 8, pp. 1-23.
---. 2014, Retrospective inference and critical thinking, Journal of Higher Medical General Education, Issue 9, pp. 25-53.


評分方式 Grading

評分項目 Grading Method 配分比例 Grading percentage 說明 Description
期中考期中考
midterm exam
30
小組期末報告小組期末報告
Final report of the group
30 老師評20分,同學互評10分
小組分組討論小組分組討論
group breakout discussion
10
期末個人寫作期末個人寫作
Final personal writing
20
上課出席點名上課出席點名
Attend roll call in class
10

授課大綱 Course Plan

Click here to open the course plan. Course Plan
交換生/外籍生選課登記 - 請點選下方按鈕加入登記清單,再等候任課教師審核。
Add this class to your wishlist by click the button below.
請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first


相似課程 Related Course

很抱歉,沒有符合條件的課程。 Sorry , no courses found.

Course Information

Description

學分 Credit:0-2
上課時間 Course Time:Friday/6,7[C214]
授課教師 Teacher:徐金雲
修課班級 Class:共必修2-4
選課備註 Memo:哲學系、行政系、會計系、法律系不得選修。
This Course is taught In English 授課大綱 Course Plan: Open

選課狀態 Attendance

There're now 74 person in the class.
目前選課人數為 74 人。

請先登入才能進行選課登記 Please login first