交互詰問為刑事訴訟實務上極為重要之一環,因此,本課程之目標有二:第一、使同學瞭解交互詰問之理論基礎與基本規則;第二、提供交互詰問演練場景,強化交互詰問之基本能力。Interactive questioning is an important part of criminal complaints. Therefore, the goals of this course are two: First, let students understand the theoretical basis and basic rules of interactive questioning; Second, provide interactive questioning training scenes and enhance the basic ability of interactive questioning.
在美日刑事訴訟採行當事人進行的訴訟構造下,交互詰問乃刑事審判證據調查的重心,係一發現真實之利器的同時,也有助於被告詰問權的保障。近年,隨著我國刑事訴訟當事人主義化的趨勢,交互詰問制度漸受重視,不僅從89年6月起已有士林、苗栗及台北等地院率先實施交互詰問,有關傳聞法則及交互詰問等證據規範已經修法增訂,於92年2月6日公布,且已於同年9月1日起全面施行。
此項修法變革,大幅影響我國刑事審判的法庭活動。為因應此項修法及制度的變革,法律系學生除了修習刑事訴訟法外,有必要針對交互詰問制度本身以及如何實踐、操作詰問技術,修習基礎而必備的知識。本課程內容分兩部分:
第一部分屬制度層面的講解,使修課學生瞭解交互詰問在整個刑事訴訟中的定位,檢察官、法官及辯護人在交互詰問中應有的角色扮演,以及操作交互詰問應有的環境及配套機制。
第二部分,則著重於交互詰問的模擬演練,使學生初步習得交互詰問的順序、詰問的方法及異議的處理等必備的知識。
Under the complaint structure conducted by the parties involved in the criminal lawsuit in the United States and Japan, interactive consultation is the focus of the investigation of criminal trials. While discovering a real weapon, it also helps to protect the defendant's right to question. In recent years, with the trend of the political agenda of criminal complaints in our country, the interactive questioning system has been emphasized. Not only has the Shilin, Miaoli and Taipei and other local courts taken the lead in implementing interactive questions since June 1989. The regulations on communication laws and interactive questions have been added to the amendment law and were announced on February 6, 1992 and have been fully implemented on September 1 of the same year.
This reform of the amendment law has greatly affected the court activities for criminal trials in our country. Due to the changes in this revision and system, in addition to practicing criminal acts, law students need to understand the basic knowledge of the interactive consultation system itself and how to implement and operate the skills. The content of this course is divided into two parts:
The first part is a system-level explanation, so that students can understand the positioning of interactive questions in the entire criminal case, the role-playing roles that prosecutors, judges and guardians should play in interactive questions, as well as the environment and supporting mechanisms that operate interactive questions.
The second part focuses on the simulation of interactive questions, so that students can get the necessary knowledge such as the order of interactive questions, the method of questioning, and the handling of differences.
「刑事詰問技術」,山室 惠編,日本刑事法學會 譯,元照
"Criminal Discussion Technology", edited by Yamamoto, translated by Japan Criminal Law Society, Motozo
評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
---|---|---|
期中考期中考 Midterm exam |
30 | |
平時成績平時成績 Regular achievements |
20 | 包括點名與參與討論之情形,綜合評定 |
交互詰問實作演練交互詰問實作演練 Interactive question practice |
50 |