1.讓修課者瞭解社會科學方法的本質與知識基礎。
2.讓修課者瞭解不同社會科學典範﹧構念間的異同與爭議。
3.讓修課者具有獨立撰寫學術性論文﹧獨立執行學術研究的能力。

1. Let course participants understand the essence and knowledge base of social science methods.
2. Let course students understand the similarities, differences, and controversies among different social science models and constructs.
3. Provide course participants with the ability to independently write academic papers and independently conduct academic research.

This course is designed for doctorate students to familiar with and shift research methodology in social science before conducting a social work research. The course is aimed at building students with independent research competencies in specifying desirable research approaches for studying practice issues and requiring research proficiency to appreciate the integration of practice and research.

This course is designed for doctorate students to familiar with and shift research methodology in social science before conducting a social work research. The course is aimed at building students with independent research competencies in specifying desirable research approaches for studying practice issues and requiring research proficiency to appreciate the integration of practice and research.

Gray, Mel; Webb, Stephen (eds.)（2012）. Social work theories and methods. Sage.
Sayer, Andrew(1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach.
Lieberson, Stanley (1996).《量化的反思：重探社會研究的邏輯》台北：巨流圖書
葉啟政(1993)。〈學術研究本土化的「本土化」〉，《本土心理學研究》1：184-192。
Blalock,H. M.Jr. (1989). "The Real and Unrealized Contribution of Quantitative Sociology." American Sociological Review. 54: 447-460.
Kennedy Donald(原著)、楊振富（譯）（2000）。《學術這一行》。臺北：天下文化。
郭秋永（2010）。社會科方法論。台北：五南。
Max Weber（原著），張旺山（譯）（2013）。韋伯方法論文集。台北：聯經出版社。
Kuhn, T. S. （原著），王道還（譯）（2004）。科學革命的結構。台北：遠流。
Smith, Mark(1998)。社會科學概說。台北：韋伯。
Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and issues.(pp. 292-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gerring, John（2012）. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework.（2nd）. Cambridge University Press.
邵軒磊（2007）。〈作為研究方法的系譜學〉。政治科學論叢 34：151-174。
Griller, R. (1996). The return of the subject? The methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. Critical Sociology, 22(1), 3-28.
http://www.tlrp.org/capacity/rm/wt/hammersley/hammersley4.html

Gray, Mel; Webb, Stephen (eds.) (2012). Social work theories and methods. Sage.
Sayer, Andrew(1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach.
Lieberson, Stanley (1996). "Quantitative Reflections: Revisiting the Logic of Social Research" Taipei: Juliu Books
Ye Qizheng (1993). "The "localization" of academic research localization", "Indigenous Psychological Research" 1: 184-192.
Blalock,H. M.Jr. (1989). "The Real and Unrealized Contribution of Quantitative Sociology." American Sociological Review. 54: 447-460.
Kennedy Donald (original), Yang Zhenfu (translation) (2000). "Academia as a Business". Taipei: Tianxia Culture.
Guo Qiuyong (2010). Social Science Methodology. Taipei: Wunan.
Max Weber (original), Zhang Wangshan (translation) (2013). Essays on Weber's Method. Taipei: Lianjing Publishing House.
Kuhn, T. S. (original), Wang Daohuan (trans.) (2004). The structure of scientific revolutions. Taipei: Yuanliu.
Smith, Mark (1998). An introduction to social sciences. Taipei: Weber.
Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and issues. (pp. 292-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gerring, John (2012). Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. (2nd). Cambridge University Press.
Shao Xuanlei (2007). "Genealogy as a Research Method". Political Science Discourses 34: 151-174.
Griller, R. (1996). The return of the subject? The methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. Critical Sociology, 22(1), 3-28.
http://www.tlrp.org/capacity/rm/wt/hammersley/hammersley4.html