1.讓修課者瞭解社會科學方法的本質與知識基礎。
2.讓修課者瞭解不同社會科學典範﹧構念間的異同與爭議。
3.讓修課者具有獨立撰寫學術性論文﹧獨立執行學術研究的能力。

1. Let students understand the nature and intellectual basis of social science methods.
2. Let the trainee understand the differences and disputes between different social science classics.
3. Give the trainees the ability to independently write academic papers﹧Independently execute academic research.

This course is designed for doctorate students to familiar with and shift research methodology in social science before conducting a social work research. The course is aimed at building students with independent research competencies in specifying desirable research approaches for studying practice issues and requiring research proficiency to appreciate the integration of practice and research.

This course is designed for doctorate students to familiar with and shift research methodology in social science before conducting a social work research. The course is aimed at building students with independent research competes in specifying desirable research approaches for studying practice issues and requiring research proficiency to appreciate the integration of practice and research.

Gray, Mel; Webb, Stephen (eds.)（2012）. Social work theories and methods. Sage.
Sayer, Andrew(1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach.
Lieberson, Stanley (1996).《量化的反思：重探社會研究的邏輯》台北：巨流圖書
葉啟政(1993)。〈學術研究本土化的「本土化」〉，《本土心理學研究》1：184-192。
Blalock,H. M.Jr. (1989). "The Real and Unrealized Contribution of Quantitative Sociology." American Sociological Review. 54: 447-460.
Kennedy Donald(原著)、楊振富（譯）（2000）。《學術這一行》。臺北：天下文化。
郭秋永（2010）。社會科方法論。台北：五南。
Max Weber（原著），張旺山（譯）（2013）。韋伯方法論文集。台北：聯經出版社。
Kuhn, T. S. （原著），王道還（譯）（2004）。科學革命的結構。台北：遠流。
Smith, Mark(1998)。社會科學概說。台北：韋伯。
Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and issues.(pp. 292-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gerring, John（2012）. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework.（2nd）. Cambridge University Press.
邵軒磊（2007）。〈作為研究方法的系譜學〉。政治科學論叢 34：151-174。
Griller, R. (1996). The return of the subject? The methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. Critical Sociology, 22(1), 3-28.
http://www.tlrp.org/capacity/rm/wt/hammersley/hammersley4.html

Gray, Mel; Webb, Stephen (eds.) (2012). Social work theories and methods. Sage.
Sayer, Andrew(1992). Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach.
Lieberson, Stanley (1996). "Quantitative Reflection: Re-exploring the Logic of Social Research" Taipei: Juliu Book
Ye Qizheng (1993). "The "localization" of localization of academic research", "Research on Local Psychology" 1:184-192.
Blalock, H. M.Jr. (1989). "The Real and Unrealized Contribution of Quantitative Sociology." American Sociological Review. 54: 447-460.
Kennedy Donald (original work), Yang Zhenfu (translation) (2000). "This Line of Learning". Taipei: World culture.
Guo Qiuyong (2010). Social Science Methodology Discussion. Taipei: Wunan.
Max Weber (original), Zhang Wangshan (translation) (2013). Collection of essays on methods of Weber. Taipei: Joint Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (original), King Dao and (translation) (2004). The structure of the scientific revolution. Taipei: Far.
Smith, Mark (1998). Overview of social sciences. Taipei: Wei Bo.
Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stresses for quality inquiry: Interpretativism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y (Eds.), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and issues.(pp. 292-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gerring, John (2012). Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. (2nd). Cambridge University Press.
Shao Xulei (2007). 〈Description as a research method〉. Political Science Forum 34:151-174.
Griller, R. (1996). The return of the subject? The methodology of Pierre Bourdieu. Critical Sociology, 22(1), 3-28.
http://www.tlrp.org/capacity/rm/wt/hammersley/hammersley4.html