1.適宜引起哲學反思之具體議題。
2.學生在上述具體議題中反思哲學問題。
3.元的之方式適合評量學生之學習成效，並訓練其表達能力。1. Specific issues suitable for triggering philosophical reflection.
2. Students reflect on philosophical issues in the above specific topics.
3. Yuan’s method is suitable for evaluating students’ learning effectiveness and training their expression ability.
1. Peter van Inwagen, Metaphysics (2002)
2. Jonathan Dancy, Contemporary Epistemology (1985)
3. E. Sosa/ M. Tooley (eds.), Causation (1993)
4. Th. Nagel, Mortal Questions (1979)
1. Peter van Inwagen, Metaphysics (2002)
2. Jonathan Dancy, Contemporary Epistemology (1985)
3. E. Sosa/ M. Tooley (eds.), Cause (1993)
4. Th. Nagel, Mortal Questions (1979)
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 學習態度（出席率）學習態度（出席率） Attitude to learning (attendance) |
20 | 6次未到扣考 |
| 小組口頭報告小組口頭報告 Group oral presentation |
40 | 各組學生進行口頭報告 |
| 小組書面報告小組書面報告 written report of the group |
40 | 本課程鼓勵學生發揮創意，報告不限於文字形式，可用不同的形式呈現 |
