本課程採用互動方式進行，課程前同學應將要讀之參考資料先行研讀，課堂上由同學針對本次授課相關文獻進行報告，老師再上課，使同學不但對授課內容充分了解，並可藉研讀文獻擴大視野，文獻報告後並應繳交一份書面專題報告，以做為本課程專題報告成績評量之依據。課程中有期中考與期末考，均以筆試進行。 本課程希望帶給同學在基本大學基礎教育與在職工作後，以較寬廣之視野與國際化之角度來檢視台灣之現行醫療制度與健康保險制度，並藉由制度經濟學與醫療經濟學之分析架構，協助同學學習如何分析與評論先進國家與台灣現行制度之優劣，並進而能提出自我獨到之見解，以協助台灣醫療制度與健保制度之未來發展。This course is conducted in an interactive way. Before the course, students should study the reference materials they are going to read. In class, students will report on the relevant literature for this lecture. The teacher will then teach the class, so that students not only fully understand the lecture content, but also can use the literature to study After broadening the horizons, a written special report should be submitted after the literature report, which will be used as the basis for the evaluation of the special report of this course. There are midterm exams and final exams in the course, both of which are written exams. This course hopes to enable students to examine Taiwan's current medical system and health insurance system from a broader perspective and an international perspective after receiving basic university education and on-the-job employment, and through the analysis of institutional economics and medical economics. The framework helps students learn how to analyze and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of the current systems in advanced countries and Taiwan, and then be able to put forward their own unique insights to assist the future development of Taiwan's medical system and health insurance system.
本課程採用互動方式進行，課程前同學應將要讀之參考資料先行研讀，課堂上由老師先做lecture，課程後段由同學針對本次授課相關文獻進行報告，使同學不但對授課內容充分了解，並可藉研讀文獻擴大視野，文獻報告後並應繳交一份書面專題報告，以做為本課程專題報告成績評量之依據。課程中有期中考與期末考，均以筆試進行。 本課程希望帶給同學在基本大學基礎教育與在職工作後，以較寬廣之視野與國際化之角度來檢視台灣之現行醫療制度與健康保險制度，並借由制度經濟學與醫療經濟學之分析架構，協助同學學習如何分析與評論先進國家與台灣現行制度之優劣，並進而能提出自我獨到之見解，以協助台灣醫療制度與健保制度之未來發展。
This course is conducted in an interactive way. Before the course, students should study the reference materials they are going to read. The teacher will give a lecture first in class. Later in the course, students will report on the relevant literature for this lecture, so that students not only fully understand the lecture content, but also You can expand your horizons by studying the literature. After the literature report, you should submit a written special report as the basis for the evaluation of the special report of this course. There are midterm exams and final exams in the course, both of which are written exams. This course hopes to enable students to examine Taiwan's current medical system and health insurance system from a broader perspective and an international perspective after receiving basic university education and on-the-job employment, and through the analysis of institutional economics and medical economics. The framework helps students learn how to analyze and comment on the advantages and disadvantages of the current systems in advanced countries and Taiwan, and then be able to put forward their own unique insights to assist the future development of Taiwan's medical system and health insurance system.
*美國健康照護制度改革與對台灣之啟示
1. Jonathan Oberlander: Unfinished Journey- A Century of Health Care Reform in United States. NEJM 2012 Aug 16:585-590.
2.Elenora E. etal: Health Care Reform: A Historic Moment in US Social Policy; JAMA;303(24):2521-2522
*德國健康照護制度改革與對台灣之啟示
1. Christa Altenstetter: Insights from Health Care in Germany. AJPH.2003:Jan93(1).
2. Cathy S etal: toward Highter-Performance Health System: Adult’s Healht Care Experiences in Seven Countries. Health Affairs 2007,26(6):717-734
*韓國與日本健康照護制度改革與對台灣之啟示
1. Sangho Moon, Jaeun Shin: Performance of Universal Health Insurance: Lessons from South Korea. World Health & Population: May/June 2007.
2. Naoki Ikegami etal: Japanese Universal Health Coverage: Evolution, Achievement and Challenges. Lancet 2011:378:1106-15.
*制度、制度變遷與經濟成就
North D.C.：Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University, 1991.(制度、制度變遷與經濟成就，作者：道格拉斯•諾斯，譯者：劉瑞華，出版：時報出版社)
*全民健保之現況與展望
1.. Chi Pang Wen et al A 10-Year Eexperience with Universal Health Insurance in Taiwan: Measuring Changes in Health and Health Disparity. Annals of Internal Medicine: 148(4). Feb 2008.
2. Robert J. Blendont et al: Inequities in health care: a five-country survey. Health Affairs: 21(3). May/June 2002.
*先進國家醫療制度之改革與挑戰
1. Norbert Goldfield: The Evolution of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): From Its Beginnings in Case-Mix and Resource Use Theory, to Its Implementation for Payment and Now for Its Current Utilization for Quality Within and Outside the Hospital. Quality Management in Health Care: 19(1). Jan-Mar 2010
2. Kai Wang, Ping Li, Ling Chen, Ken Kato, Makoto Kobayashi, Kazunobu Yamauchi: Impact of the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination-based Payment System in Japan. J Med Syst: 34(1).Feb 2010.
3. Soonman Kwon: Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea. Health Policy and Planning: 18(1).2003
4. Alexandra T. Clyde et al: Experience with Medicare’s New Technology Add-On Payment Program. Health Affairs: 27
*The reform of the U.S. health care system and its implications for Taiwan
1. Jonathan Oberlander: Unfinished Journey- A Century of Health Care Reform in United States. NEJM 2012 Aug 16:585-590.
2. Elenora E. etal: Health Care Reform: A Historic Moment in US Social Policy; JAMA;303(24):2521-2522
*German health care system reform and its implications for Taiwan
1. Christa Altenstetter: Insights from Health Care in Germany. AJPH.2003:Jan93(1).
2. Cathy S etal: toward Higher-Performance Health System: Adult’s Health Care Experiences in Seven Countries. Health Affairs 2007,26(6):717-734
*Health care system reform in South Korea and Japan and its implications for Taiwan
1. Sangho Moon, Jaeun Shin: Performance of Universal Health Insurance: Lessons from South Korea. World Health & Population: May/June 2007.
2. Naoki Ikegami etal: Japanese Universal Health Coverage: Evolution, Achievement and Challenges. Lancet 2011:378:1106-15.
*Institutions, institutional changes and economic achievements
North D.C.: Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University, 1991. (Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Author: Douglas North, Translator: Liu Ruihua, Published by: Times Press)
*Current status and prospects of national health insurance
1.. Chi Pang Wen et al A 10-Year Eexperience with Universal Health Insurance in Taiwan: Measuring Changes in Health and Health Disparity. Annals of Internal Medicine: 148(4). Feb 2008.
2. Robert J. Blendont et al: Inequities in health care: a five-country survey. Health Affairs: 21(3). May/June 2002.
*Reforms and challenges of medical systems in advanced countries
1. Norbert Goldfield: The Evolution of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): From Its Beginnings in Case-Mix and Resource Use Theory, to Its Implementation for Payment and Now for Its Current Utilization for Quality Within and Outside the Hospital. Quality Management in Health Care: 19(1). Jan-Mar 2010
2. Kai Wang, Ping Li, Ling Chen, Ken Kato, Makoto Kobayashi, Kazunobu Yamauchi: Impact of the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination-based Payment System in Japan. J Med Syst: 34(1).Feb 2010.
3. Soonman Kwon: Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea. Health Policy and Planning: 18(1).2003
4. Alexandra T. Clyde et al: Experience with Medicare’s New Technology Add-On Payment Program. Health Affairs: 27
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平時表現平時表現 daily performance |
15 | |
| 文獻報告文獻報告 Literature report |
25 | |
| 期中與期末考期中與期末考 Midterm and final exams |
60 | 各占30%與30% |
