歐洲近代，自啟蒙運動到歐盟整合，歷經法國大革命、急速工業化、民族主義運動、兩次大戰以、核武競賽的冷戰，以至今日的歐盟整合。在這250年裡，歐洲人用他們的歷史思想做出了不同的時代診斷；那些歷史思想表達最清晰的地方是他們的史學作品。本課程的目標在分析歷史作品，藉以瞭解這250年的變化；而且將從英國、法國以及德國三個不同發展模式的民族國家，瞭解他們歷史思考方式與所提出歷史問題的異同。
歷史學今天早已成為全世界大學裡理所當然的一門科系；正好在這個250年裡，歐洲歷史學留下了很清楚的“科學化”與 “制度化“ 的發展痕跡，這也將是本課程講述的現象。Modern Europe, from the Enlightenment to EU integration, has gone through the French Revolution, rapid industrialization, nationalist movements, the two World Wars, the Cold War in the nuclear arms race, and even today's EU integration. During these 250 years, Europeans used their historical thoughts to make different diagnoses of the times; the clearest expression of those historical thoughts is in their historical works. The goal of this course is to analyze historical works to understand the changes in the past 250 years; and from three nation-states with different development models, the United Kingdom, France and Germany, to understand the similarities and differences in their historical thinking methods and the historical questions they raised.
History has long become a natural subject in universities around the world; precisely during these 250 years, European history has left clear traces of its "scientific" and "institutionalized" development, which will also be the subject of this course narrated phenomenon.
1. 1. 胡昌智(譯註)，1982，自然與歷史(J.G. Droysen)，台北，思與言，20卷第4期，頁74-83
2. 2. 胡昌智，1984，韋伯(Max Weber)論歷史學的客觀性及其檢討，台中，東海學報，第25期，頁141-155
3. 3. 周樑楷，1986，英國史學上的「經濟史取向」：其形成及艾希頓的貢獻，刊於：中西史學史研討會論文集，中興大學，頁251-282
4. 4. George G. Iggers，1986，Historical studies in the West: A Critical Retrospect，刊於：中西史學史研討會論文集，中興大學，頁283-289
5. 5. 胡昌智(譯註)，1988.09，政治對話（Ranke, Leopold v.）思與言，第26卷第三期，頁68-88
6. 6. 胡昌智（譯註），1990.12，論史家的任務（Humboldt, Wilhelm v.），台北，西洋史集刊，第2期，頁203-223
7. 7. 楊肅獻，1998.12，英格蘭有啟蒙運動嗎？－歷史家論十八世紀的英國與啟蒙思想，新史學 第9卷4期，頁1-38。
8. 侯建新，2001，當代西方史學流派，香港，知書房出版集團（昭明）
8. 9. 楊豫(譯)，2003，二十世紀的史學(George G. Iggers)，香港，知書房出版集團（昭明）
9. 10. 陈恒, 耿相新（編譯），2006，布勞岱爾的遺產，香港，知書房出版集團（昭明）
11. 花亦芬（譯註），2007，義大利文藝復興時代的文化─一本嘗試之作（J. Burckhardt），台北，聯經出版
1. 1. Hu Changzhi (translation and annotation), 1982, Nature and History (J.G. Droysen), Taipei, Thought and Speech, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp. 74-83
2. 2. Hu Changzhi, 1984, Max Weber on the objectivity of history and its review, Taichung, Journal of the East China Sea, Issue 25, pp. 141-155
3. 3. Zhou Liangkai, 1986, "Economic History Orientation" in British History: Its Formation and Ashton's Contribution, published in: Proceedings of the Symposium on the History of Chinese and Western Historiography, National Chung Hsing University, pp. 251-282
4. 4. George G. Iggers, 1986, Historical studies in the West: A Critical Retrospect, published in: Proceedings of the Symposium on the History of Chinese and Western Historiography, National Chung Hsing University, pp. 283-289
5. 5. Hu Changzhi (translation and annotation), 1988.09, Political Dialogue (Ranke, Leopold v.) Thought and Speech, Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 68-88
6. 6. Hu Changzhi (translation and annotation), 1990.12, On the Task of the Historian (Humboldt, Wilhelm v.), Taipei, Western History Collection, Issue 2, pp. 203-223
7. 7. Yang Suxian, 1998.12, Is there an Enlightenment Movement in England? - Historians on England and Enlightenment Thought in the Eighteenth Century, New Historiography, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1-38.
8. Hou Jianxin, 2001, Contemporary Western Historical Schools, Hong Kong, Zhishufang Publishing Group (Zhaoming)
8. 9. Yang Yu (translated), 2003, Historiography in the Twentieth Century (George G. Iggers), Hong Kong, Zhishufang Publishing Group (Zhaoming)
9. 10. Chen Heng, Geng Xiangxin (compiler), 2006, Braudel’s Legacy, Hong Kong, Zhishufang Publishing Group (Zhao Ming)
11. Hua Yifen (translation and annotation), 2007, The Culture of the Italian Renaissance - An Attempt (J. Burckhardt), Taipei, Lianjing Publishing House
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 出席、、出席、、 Attend,, |
10 | |
| 參與討論參與討論 Participate in discussions |
40 | |
| 報告報告 report |
25 | |
| 考試考試 exam |
25 |
