藉由討論醫療糾紛一系列的重要相關研究，由台灣醫療糾紛現狀出發、探討醫療過失的判斷、醫師的告知義務、醫療糾紛的民事及刑事責任、醫療糾紛的鑑定以及醫療糾紛的舉證責任等議題，幫助學生學習如何結合傳統的法學論述以及法實證分析研究，以提升其進行法學相關研究之基本能力。本課程不僅是關心醫療糾紛的研究生之首選課程，也是對於法學研究有興趣的研究生之必選課程。By discussing a series of important related studies on medical disputes, starting from the current situation of medical disputes in Taiwan, we explore issues such as the judgment of medical negligence, doctors' notification obligations, civil and criminal liability for medical disputes, identification of medical disputes, and the burden of proof for medical disputes. , to help students learn how to combine traditional legal discourse and legal empirical analysis and research to improve their basic ability to conduct legal-related research. This course is not only the first choice course for graduate students who are concerned about medical disputes, but also a must-select course for graduate students who are interested in legal research.
1. 吳俊穎、陳榮基、楊增暐、賴惠蓁：清官難斷醫務事？醫療過失責任與醫療糾紛鑑定(ISBN: 978-986-255-187-5) (元照出版社，2012年6月出版)。
2. 吳俊穎、賴惠蓁、陳榮基：法官，我說明夠了嗎？醫師說明義務法院判決評析 (ISBN: 978-957-9201-45-2) (橘井出版社，2010年7月出版)。
1. Wu Junying, Chen Rongji, Yang Zengwei, Lai Huizhen: Is it difficult for honest officials to judge medical affairs? Medical Negligence Liability and Medical Dispute Identification (ISBN: 978-986-255-187-5) (Yuanzhao Publishing House, published in June 2012).
2. Wu Junying, Lai Huizhen, Chen Rongji: Judge, have I explained enough? Commentary on the Court's Judgment on Physicians' Obligation to Explain (ISBN: 978-957-9201-45-2) (Tachibana Press, published in July 2010).
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 課堂文獻報告課堂文獻報告 Class Literature Report |
40 | |
| 課堂參與討論課堂參與討論 Participate in class discussions |
40 | |
| 出席率出席率 Attendance |
20 |
