知識與社會實踐有什麼關係？這是最近社會系學生們關注的話題。本課程打破傳統「是否走出象牙塔？」與知識/社會實踐的二元對立，強調沒有經過社會生活與社會實踐的「測試」與粹鍊，理論上思辯經常落入書空咄咄與虛無主義。本課程試圖將同學帶入更靠近常民生活的世界，面對現實受苦的人們與社會運動組織者的想法，藉此減少知識份子與常民生活的隔閡。唯有更貼近常民生活與社會運動者的處境，才能在個人以及集體層次上抗衡主流意識形態的支配（例如，對社會運動「丟鞋」反感的主流意識形態）。進而，基進化我們所學的社會學內涵，走出象牙塔。
本課程將請到與此議題相關的社會運動工作者，談談自己在行動過程中遇到什麼問題，如何面對國家與科技官僚以看似中立客觀的意識型態進行治理，而這種科學數字的治理卻可能有許多特定政治立場的介入，例如，核電數字迷思、RCA與台灣經濟奇蹟背後的問題、中科環評爭議等。同時，課程以科技與社會（STS）為主要理論依據，以科學爭議、科學不確定性、技術物的政治性、流行病學的爭議等問題，切入台灣社會問題，並且以社會運動者與RCA受害者等經驗為基礎，瞭解社會運動者如何介入這類爭議，翻轉跨國企業或國家、科技官僚的支配。What is the relationship between knowledge and social practice? This is a topic of recent concern to sociology students. This course breaks the traditional binary opposition between "Are you stepping out of the ivory tower?" and knowledge/social practice, emphasizing that without the "test" and refinement of social life and social practice, theoretical thinking often falls into bookishness and nihilism. This course attempts to bring students into a world closer to ordinary people's lives, and to face the thoughts of people who are suffering in reality and social movement organizers, thereby reducing the gap between intellectuals and ordinary people's lives. Only by getting closer to the lives of ordinary people and the situation of social activists can we resist the dominance of mainstream ideologies at the individual and collective levels (for example, mainstream ideologies that are disgusted with the "shoe-losing" of social movements). Furthermore, we can basically evolve the sociological connotations we have learned and get out of the ivory tower.
This course will invite social movement workers related to this issue to talk about the problems they encountered during their actions and how they faced the state and technocrats in governing with a seemingly neutral and objective ideology, and this scientific However, the governance of digital may involve the involvement of many specific political stances, such as the digital myth of nuclear power, the issues behind RCA and Taiwan’s economic miracle, the China-Kuwait environmental impact assessment controversy, etc. At the same time, the course is based on Science, Technology and Society (STS) as the main theoretical basis, and cuts into Taiwan's social issues based on issues such as scientific controversy, scientific uncertainty, the politics of technological objects, and epidemiological controversies. It also uses social activists and RCA Based on the experience of victims, we understand how social activists intervene in such disputes and overturn the dominance of multinational corporations, states, and technocrats.
1.《勞工看的台灣史》1,2,3。敬仁勞工中心、苦勞網出版。
2. STM期刊：RCA專題。
3.《拒絕被遺忘的聲音：RCA工殤口述史》。
4. 吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟合編（2004）。STS讀本Ⅰ、Ⅱ《科技渴望性別》、《科技渴望社會》。群學出版社。
5. 王文基、王秀雲、郭文華，2012，《意外多重奏：STS如何重組真相》。行人。
1. "History of Taiwan from the perspective of laborers" 1, 2, 3. Published by Jingren Labor Center and Kulao.com.
2. STM Journal: RCA Special Topic.
3. "Voices Refusing to be Forgotten: An Oral History of the RCA Labor Tragedy."
4. Wu Jialing, Fu Dawei, Lei Xianglin (2004). STS Readers I and II "Technology Desires Gender" and "Technology Desires Society". Qunxue Publishing House.
5. Wang Wenji, Wang Xiuyun, and Guo Wenhua, 2012, "Unexpected Duo: How STS Reorganizes the Truth." pedestrian.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 期末調查報告期末調查報告 Final investigation report |
40 | |
| 平時成績與實做平時成績與實做 Daily results and practice |
30 | |
| 期末口頭報告期末口頭報告 Final oral report |
30 |
