1.提高修課學生對高齡社會、銀髮產業的認識，並能透過與高齡者互動瞭解其生理、心理與社會面的需求。
2.培養學生社會關懷的素養，並對投入解決高齡者社會問題有更為正面的態度
3.培養學生具備進行產業分析、市場研究的能力，並能初步思考可能的服務創新或商業模式創新
4.培養學生具備剖析社會問題與分析、評估社會政策的能力
1. Improve students’ understanding of the aging society and the silver-haired industry, and enable them to understand their physical, psychological and social needs through interaction with the elderly.
2. Cultivate students' social care literacy and have a more positive attitude towards investing in solving social problems of the elderly.
3. Cultivate students with the ability to conduct industry analysis and market research, and to initially think about possible service innovations or business model innovations
4. Cultivate students’ ability to analyze social problems and analyze and evaluate social policies
Chesbrough, Henry.（李芳齡譯），2011，《開放式服務創新》。天下文化。
Johnson, Mark. （林麗冠譯），2010)，《白地策略》。天下文化。
Ramon, C.M, and T. Jorge. 2012. “ When one Business Model isn’t enough.” Harvard Business Review, January-February.
Ramon, C.M, and J.E. Ricart. 2011. “How to Design a Winning Business Model.” Harvard Business Review, January-February.
Gilbert, N. and P. Terrell. 2005. Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy(6th). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
李瑞金，2011，〈我國老人福利政策與立法發展〉。《社區發展季刊》133：93-108。
詹火生，2006，《主要國家因應人口老化社會福利政策之研究》。台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。
于宗先、王金利，2009，《台灣人口變動與經濟發展 (台灣經濟論業15)》。台北：聯經。
王篤強，2010，〈社會福利制度的原則與資格〉，收錄於張世雄等主編之《社會福利概論》。台北：空大。31-50。
丘昌泰，2010，《公共政策：基礎篇(第四版)》。台北市：巨流。
黃源協，2004，〈從「全控機構」到「最佳價值」─英國社區照顧發展的脈絡與省思〉。《社區發展季刊》106：308-331。
楊志良，2010，〈我國長期照顧現況與展望〉。《研考雙月刊》34(3)：86-91。
葉至誠，2010，《老人福利國際借鑑》。台北：秀威資訊科技。
經建會，2009，〈我國長期照顧需求推估及服務供給現況〉。《台灣經濟論衡》7(10)，54-71。
莊秀美，2008，《長期照顧機構服務變遷之研究─單位照顧、團體家屋的實踐理念及前瞻趨勢之分析》。臺北：松慧。
蔡啟源，2008，〈建構老人長期照顧制度之我見─日本「公共介護制度」經驗之參酌〉。《社區發展季刊》121：428-457。
黃旐濤、徐慶發、賴添福，2009，《老人服務事業經營與管理》。台北：心理。
Chesbrough, Henry. (Translated by Li Fangling), 2011, "Open Service Innovation". World culture.
Johnson, Mark. (Translated by Lin Liguan), 2010), "White Earth Strategy". World culture.
Ramon, C.M, and T. Jorge. 2012. “When one Business Model isn’t enough.” Harvard Business Review, January-February.
Ramon, C.M, and J.E. Ricart. 2011. “How to Design a Winning Business Model.” Harvard Business Review, January-February.
Gilbert, N. and P. Terrell. 2005. Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy(6th). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Li Ruijin, 2011, "my country's Elderly Welfare Policy and Legislative Development". Community Development Quarterly 133:93-108.
Zhan Huosheng, 2006, "Research on Social Welfare Policies of Major Countries in Response to Population Aging". Taipei: Economic Construction Committee, Executive Yuan.
Yu Zongxian and Wang Jinli, 2009, "Taiwan's Population Change and Economic Development (Taiwan Economic Review 15)". Taipei: Lianjing.
Wang Duqiang, 2010, "Principles and Qualifications of the Social Welfare System", included in "Introduction to Social Welfare" edited by Zhang Shixiong and others. Taipei: Kongda. 31-50.
Qiu Changtai, 2010, "Public Policy: Basics (Fourth Edition)". Taipei City: Juliu.
Huang Yuanxie, 2004, "From "full control agency" to "best value" - context and reflections on the development of community care in the UK". Community Development Quarterly 106: 308-331.
Yang Zhiliang, 2010, "Current Situation and Prospects of Long-term Care in my country". "Bimonthly Journal of Research and Examination" 34(3): 86-91.
Ye Zhicheng, 2010, "International Reference on Elderly Welfare". Taipei: Showway Information Technology.
Council for Economic Development and Development, 2009, "Estimation of my country's Long-term Care Demand and Current Service Supply". "Taiwan Economic Review" 7(10), 54-71.
Zhuang Xiumei, 2008, "Research on Service Changes in Long-term Care Institutions - Analysis of Practical Concepts and Prospective Trends of Unit Care and Group Homes". Taipei: Songhui.
Cai Qiyuan, 2008, "My opinion on constructing a long-term care system for the elderly - Reflections on the experience of Japan's "public nursing care system"". Community Development Quarterly 121: 428-457.
Huang Weitao, Xu Qingfa, Lai Tianfu, 2009, "Operation and Management of Elderly Services". Taipei: Psychology.
| 評分項目 Grading Method | 配分比例 Grading percentage | 說明 Description |
|---|---|---|
| 平常表現與參與平常表現與參與 Daily performance and participation |
10 | |
| 期中考期中考 midterm exam |
20 | |
| 期末考期末考 final exam |
20 | |
| 課堂作業與報告課堂作業與報告 Classwork and Reports |
20 | |
| 期末分組報告期末分組報告 End-of-period group report |
30 |
